Libertarian Alliance Comment On UK Election Result

Britain,Democracy,Elections,libertarianism

            

Sean Gabb, Director of the UK Libertarian Alliance (he’s a friend), on the upshot of the elections in England:

“This was not a general election in which a distinctively libertarian force was likely to win power. There was also no chance of a win for traditionalist conservatives. We were not seriously consulted on the European Union, the American alliance, immigration, multiculturalism, drugs, due process civil liberties, the response to alleged man-made climate change, the dominance of big business corporatism, and many other issues of great importance. Instead, given the electoral system we have, we had a choice between difference emphases within a single consensus.

I chose to vote Conservative because, on balance, I believed that the Labour Party was the most likely to turn the country into a naked police state. I am glad that Labour lost. At the same time, I am glad that the Conservatives did not win an overall majority. Given that anything short of a huge and unmanageable majority would have given David Cameron all reason to suppose he was the Anointed One, a hung Parliament is the best outcome.

A Con-Lib pact or whatever sort will not address the issues mentioned above. But it probably will abolish identity cards and the database state that it fronts. It will probably not ‘regulate’ home education. It may rein in the Police and the bureaucracy. Even if the country does not become a better place, it may not grow worse as fast as it would under a Labour Government.

Above all, a majority Labour Government would have fixed the system to keep itself in power forever. It would have used its own creatures in the Police and the bureaucracy to harass and perhaps even to murder its opponents. A Con-Lib pact will do none of these things. It will allow a free and fair election at the end of its term, in which some distinctively libertarian or traditionalist force may have a better chance of making its voice heard.”

[SNIP]

Listen to Sean’s interview with the BBC against compulsory voting. Do you know anyone in the US who verbalizes and reasons as Sean does? On choosing to withhold the vote as a judgment:

“The people have looked at these three nauseous political parties and said, ‘None of the above.'” And, “I will do anything short of assassination to get rid of Gordon Brown as prime minister.”

We know what that feels like.

3 thoughts on “Libertarian Alliance Comment On UK Election Result

  1. Bob Harrison

    The Liberal Democrats favored the adoption of the Euro. I’m guessing once people realized that they got over their “Clegg-mania.” Even now the Brits want to control their own monetary policy and not cede those powers to Berlin.
    Do you have a preference about the presidential system we have in the states vs the parliamentary system so prevalent in Europe?

  2. Myron Pauli

    1. Once I was COMPELLED to answer an opinion survey by these people who asked completely irrelevant questions and had a track record of utter incompetence. I would have been happier not to waste my time but management insisted so I completely trashed everything.

    2. Gabb wrote a well-reasoned column on why laws punishing nonsense like holocaust denial are themselves nonsensical and insidious.

    3. What is most important is NOT who gets elected or the election process but: (a) the popular mindset and (b) the role of government. “Reforms” like term limits or instant runoff voting are basically irrelevant gimmicks. The popular mindset in most countries is in favor of big meddlesome government. Few governments seem to operate within the concept of a limited government – that is, government that exercises only those powers it is explicitly authorized to have.

  3. Roy Bleckert

    This Myron Pauli dude gets it … Bravo MP !

    3. What is most important is NOT who gets elected or the election process but: (a) the popular mindset and (b) the role of government. “Reforms” like term limits or instant runoff voting are basically irrelevant gimmicks. The popular mindset in most countries is in favor of big meddlesome government. Few governments seem to operate within the concept of a limited government – that is, government that exercises only those powers it is explicitly authorized to have.

Comments are closed.