Prof. Paul Gottfried on ‘La-Raza Libertarians’

IMMIGRATION,Islam,Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim,libertarianism

            

The intrepid Professors Paul Gottfried writes the following in response to “La-Raza Libertarians“:

May Heaven bless you for raising these politically incorrect issues! Right now I’m looking at the tracts of a candidate for international relations at our college, who praises the West Germans for being so “wracked with guilt” that they handed over their country to Muslim immigrants.
As the descendant of people whom the Nazis chased out of Europe, I don’t feel compensated by the lunatic decision to deliver that straying continent into the hands of Islamicists. In fact I wouldn’t want these immigrants and asylum-seekers invading Europe from the Third World, whether or not they collect welfare benefits once they reach their destination.
It is essential that we keep making the distinction between favoring the free market whether here, in Israel, or in Europe, and encouraging the lunatic leftist ideology of open borders. What makes the view that you assailed yesterday particularly dishonest is that no one who expresses it wants us to stop Third World underclass immigration until we have abolished the welfare state. They are simply making excuses for not noticing who comes here.

—Paul Gottfried

3 thoughts on “Prof. Paul Gottfried on ‘La-Raza Libertarians’

  1. Carolus

    Yet another first rate comment from Paul Gottfried! Nice to have him hanging around here. You may not have a great many folks at this site, Ilana, but you certainly seem to attract some of the finest minds out there – like Dr. Gottfried and Lawrence Auster. That’s only natural in light of the very fine quality of your own writings.

    Here’s a virtual tip of the hat and handshake, Dr. Gottfried. You’re definitely one of the good guys in my book. May you long continue in your excellent endeavors.

  2. Michael Barnett

    Just read that piece. Loved it.

    Here’s a taste of things to come in the US: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1494

    Belgian and Dutch Parties Try to Put Genie Back in the Bottle
    From the desk of Paul Belien on Thu, 2006-10-12 22:49

    Belgium introduced voting rights for non-Belgian residents in order to counter the “islamophobic” and Flemish secessionist Vlaams Belang (VB). As a result multitudes of Muslim candidates were elected in major cities in last Sunday’s local elections. In Antwerp the immigrants are now demanding an alderman’s post in the city government, which consists of the mayor and ten aldermen. In Brussels the Parti Socialiste (PS) is embarrassed at the election of Murat Denizli as a Socialist councilor. Denizli is a hardright Turkish extremist belonging to the Grey Wolves. In the Netherlands political parties are facing serious problems with Turkish candidates who refuse to acknowledge the 1915 Armenian genocide.

    In Antwerp all the mainstream parties have (again) teamed up in a coalition in order to keep the VB out of local government. In 1989 the Belgian parties signed an agreement — the so-called “cordon sanitaire” — that, no matter what the outcome of the elections may be, they will never enter into a coalition with the VB. The VB has 20 of the 55 seats in the new Antwerp city council. The new governing coalition of Socialists, Christian-Democrats and Liberals holds 33 seats. Of the latter 9 seats are held by Muslims (7 Socialists and 2 Christian-Dems), which gives them real vetoing power within the new coalition. The most popular candidate on the Socialist list of mayor Patrick Janssens is Fauzaya Talhaoui. She got more votes than any other candidate apart from Janssens himself. Talhaoui wants to become a city alderman, but her demand is posing problems for the mayor, who had already promised the position of alderman to other politicians before the elections.

  3. Carolus

    Thanks for the info on this, Mr. Barnett. It’s fairly obvious that Sharia in Beligium is only a matter of time. In light of the so-called “cordon sanitaire” a defacto alliance with the invaders and colonizers, I would suggest that all of those who support such acts of treason have therefore identified themselves as legitimate targets for acts of war.

Comments are closed.