What They Do In Dictatorships

Democracy,Environmentalism & Animal Rights,Ethics,Individual Rights,Journalism,Justice,Law,Media,Middle East,Private Property

            

The courts, stacked as they are with judges who work for the dictator, want to put a brave rebel behind bars for shooting a predator on his property. The rebel shot and killed a wild, extremely dangerous animal that thrives in the dictator’s country. All the tribesman did was to aggressively repel from human habitat a creature that had become brazen, making itself at home near the man’s children as they played. It used to be that these tribesmen instilled fear in encroaching creatures. But thanks to decades of cultural and legal emasculation under the dictator, the queered men folk are no longer licensed to protect home and hearth. If they do, they lose their liberty.

I bet you thought this was Anderson Cooper reporting from Libya, botching the job of journalism, as is his wont.

No, this is about an American, one among many (Jeremy M. Hill, 33), who pleaded not guilty in U.S. District Court to killing a grizzly bear with a rifle on his 20-acre property near Porthill, Idaho, at the Canadian border.

Jeremy Hill has six kids, ranging in age from 14 years old to 10 months old. At least five were home when the grizzly was killed, Mike Hill said. The bears had gone after some pigs in a pen that the kids had been raising, Mike Hill said.

I wonder how many Libyans have been arrested for shooting wild animals that threatened their families.

If given the choice, I’d choose the right to defend my life and property over the vote, any day.

6 thoughts on “What They Do In Dictatorships

  1. james huggins

    I wondered if Ilana would would pick up on this story. When I read it I was not surprised. All must remember that the chickified political correctness varies inversely with logic and common sense. If I find a rat in my garage am I allowed to trap it?

  2. james huggins

    Another thought on the bear story. I would like to see one of those Berkely sociology majors if they happened on a bear in their back yard. Shooting would be out of the question as that would be the reaction of a man. And, of course he wouldn’t be able to run until he changed his shorts. Life is full of these thorny decisions when one is a complete fool.

  3. Dennis

    WAIT A MINUTE! It seems to me that Mr Hill was OPERATING UNDER government’s newly to-be-introduced legal position: THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE! Bears are omnivores…kids and farm animals, i.e. pigs, are protein. Bears get hunger pangs when they do not eat enough. Bears have BIG TEETH and CLAWS…DANGEROUS WEAPONS by any standard. Therefore, under the auspices of a PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE, Mr Hill took the appropriate action – shooting the bear – and saved his children and his family’s future sustenance. In fact, I think the BEAR SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH A HATE CRIME! The brute should know that its strengths and weapons are far superior to an unarmed human, thus, the bear engaged in PREMEDITATED DESIGNS to harm the children – the least able to defend themselves against the bear’s savagery.

    ps: Yesterday, a commentor discussing his position that there are numerous “sides” vying for power in Libya, BUT most likely no elections will take place until all the guns are collected – that would be the prudent thing to do. Hmmm, what “sides” are bears and which are the “Hills”?

  4. Myron Pauli

    If there is a plausible claim of self-defense, the charges should be dropped or he should be acquitted. If the bear was shot for sport or commerce, I have less sympathy because I do think we share a planet with “nature”. The assumption of innocence and self-defense should be in favor of the property owner.

    I’m thinking, however, of people shooting eagles who “overfly” their property…. and I am slightly leery about hunting animals to extinction (in spite of support of property rights)

    [Thanks for making this point. See you Saturday.]

  5. james huggins

    The bear had already tried to get some pigs belonging to the children and 5 of those kids were in the home. If he was successful in driving the bear out of the yard there’s no way he could get the bear to leave the area as those pigs were still out there. And of course the young people were still there and might be in danger whenever leaving the house. Eliminating the bear was dad’s responsibility.

Comments are closed.