Yes, I would agree entirely. The difficulty for me was that they were suspicious of federal funding of the practice and using this as a smoke screen for the entire over-haul — talk about missing the forest for the tree. I suspect Ilana was mildly irritated and was not really condemning her own reader’s fetish against the practice.

If you haven’t already, now’s a good time to make sure your household has a good musket, 60 rounds powder and ball, hatchet, and all that.

And what about people who have treatments denied or delayed by a government that has to manage costs? What about physician shortages that usually occur when prices are rationed as in the UK and Canada? What about drugs and medical procedures that are disallowed by bureaucrats – and the victims of those decisions?

This bill simultaneously (1) increases the American subjects’ (citizen is a term referring to free people – subjects are more appropriate these days) reliance on the government AND (2) increases the perilous financial state of that same provider-government. These effects will likely result in a greater health catastrophe.

However, our Republican “allies” (with a few exceptions) have no principles except the acquisition of power. They are merely positioning themselves politically to gain from any political fallout over the next few years.

But conservadems and their Republican pals have managed to muddy the voice of freedom with their constant pules for fetuses (not their own), ????