Comments on: UPDATE VIII: America’s Angelic O.J. (No Hearsay, Please!)

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Sun, 09 Oct 2011 03:17:01 +0000

The crime scene photos are ALL on the Internet?? Predatory vultures. Nadeau sounds exploitative as well, thorough reporting or not. Auster, I hear that their blood was mixed. How do you explain the facts about the cell phones, and the kissy-feely crap the two alleged hormones-in-crime were doing while the police came in? I thought Knox claimed she HEARD the crime occur.

By: Jack

Jack — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:52:06 +0000

Link to Steve Moore material as requested by Ilana above….

[See post.]

By: Lawrence Auster

Lawrence Auster — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:00:46 +0000

Which of the two following possibilities is more likely? One, that the black hoodlum Guede, who had previously been arrested burgling other establishments (including breaking into a second story window) but had been let go by police, broke into the girls' flat to commit burglary and unexpectedly encountered Meredith, whereupon he sexually assaulted and killed her? Or, two, that the two white college students formed a sexual torture trio with the black burglar Rudy Guede on the spur of the moment, and the three of them together sexually assaulted and killed Meredith? Number two is what the prosecutors and you believe. On the basis of zero evidence. Guede's DNA is all over the murder room. Knox's and Sollecito's DNA is absent. The footprint which was said to be Sollecito's is not his. The knife in Sollecito's kitchen, a big deal in the initial trial, does not have enough DNA to serve as evidence. Also, Amanda's famous "confession" to the police was not a confession, but an imaginary scenario which she was pushed into adopting at the end of an all-night interrogation , and which was so improper it was not allowed even in the original trial. (See original entry here.)

By: Jerri Lynn Ward

Jerri Lynn Ward — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:40:06 +0000

One of my contract people is a forensic investigator. She has gone through the crime scene photos and procedures (It’s all out on the internet). The forensic investigation was a complete joke. The postal police first came in and stomped all over the crime scene. The investigators took armfuls of clothes out of a hamper and threw it on the floor where it lay for a long time. That was only part of the problem. What I am saying is that they mixed DNA up all over the room. The “bloody” footprints in the bathroom. What the luminol was revealing was bleach which you would expect to find on a bathroom floor because of the cleaners that are used. I didn’t know what to think of this case until I spoke with my contract employee for a couple of hours.

[See post update.]

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:48:54 +0000

Yes they are. I think I’d have crumbled a long time ago.

By: Jack

Jack — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:30:16 +0000

For those interested in the counter-arguments that ultimately set Amanda Knox free the best source is Steve Moore, a retired FBI investigator. After reading the prosecution case summarized by Ilana and Ms. Coulter I read Mr. Moore’s defense and reached a verdict of not guilty.

[Is this “retired officer” someone who reporters for years from the scene; who knows Italian and is familiar with “dem foreigners and der rotten system,” as my source is? I doubt it. But do provide a link, if you cite a worthy source.]

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 07:39:32 +0000

Out of curiosity, does anyone know if Meredith’s family is religious? It’d be nice to know if they have some comfort.

[I have no idea, J., but they are tremendously dignified and regal.]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:14:33 +0000

If I were convicted of a crime I would be perfectly willing to be tried by a jury of my peers. Problem is, I don’t define “my peers” as “village idiots.”

By: My RON-PAUL i

My RON-PAUL i — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:31:22 +0000

My peronal preference is to withold personal judgement of guilt/innocence in cases where I have NOT heard all the evidence (and CNN/FOX/MSNBC is not a court of law!).

Nevertheless, it upsets me if “Dream Teams” of slimy lawyers can constantly bamboozle idiotic juries into acquitting the guilty. Such events erode the rule of law which in turn provides a “justification” for the Bush-Cheney-Obama style Judge-Jury-Executioner lynch-mob-vigilante approach.

My preference is for a reasonable adverserial system, focused on a search for the truth, within the rules of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, judged by a jury of INTELLIGENT PEERS (not every schnook that can be rounded up!). Maybe it is far too much to ask for and we are headed back to the Stone Age of barbarians with clubs making the law.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:30:13 +0000

Quite crude, but is this out of the realm of possibilities…a Girl-on-Girl movie starring the above mentioned individuals?

They would be “filthy” rich, globally more (in)famous than now, and celebrated by both Euro-trash and Hollywood elite.

Their coupling would be what America needs – ROLE MODELS FOR YOUNG WOMEN.