Sigh! The entire point of my posts was to demonstrate that there is nothing that authorizes the government to deny anyone “rights of the US Justice system”…which is right on topic.

[You’re right: debate should be on-topic.]

1. Do you believe that half the Moslems in the world (500 million people) [where do you get this bogus, optimistic number!] hate the American people enough to want to kill us?
2. If you do believe that they hate the American people so much, what do you believe to be the cause(s) of that hatred?
3. Do you believe those 500 million people form a serious military threat against which we must defend ourselves?

Thanks.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Is it not absolutely clear that our government is directly violating the rather explicit language of these Amendments?

Google “Mideast Executions” just to see what we are up against. Some people seem to look for any excuse to let the Muslims slide so as not to face them. I am not of that mind. If they want to jihad I’m willing to jihad with them. The comparison to “those violent Presbyterians” is the kind of nonsensical, factless moral equivalence that progressives just love.

However in the war of semantics- I declare you the winner.

The Declaration says that “all men…are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights” and there nothing in that statement can honestly be construed as meaning anything else.

[Excellent, RG; This kind of illuminating extra-work is encouraged.]

[Sigh. I have just answered this liberal delusion in the post “Murder By Majority (Or Mercy Killing).” There I complained about the endless repetitions into which I am forced.]