printOf course British Counter Terrorism agencies are furious over any leaks of information (that belongs to the People). Leaks reveal their ineptitude; their dereliction of duty. Leaks reveal the elaborate protections put in place by the people’s representatives for … members of the protected species. Never stop a swarthy looking chap with a backpack (in this case Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi). He could be a Muslim. A security strategy practiced across the UK and Europe. Better to allow innocents die than be caught in a politically impious posture (such as questioning a swarthy looking chap with a backpack).
What British security call “leaks” are really bits and pieces they’d like to conceal because these may force action or expose ineptitude.
Via The Telegraph comes a familiar tale (chronicled previously in the column, “Life With Islam And Its Enablers”):
The Manchester suicide bomber was repeatedly flagged to the authorities over his extremist views, but was not stopped by officers, it emerged Wednesday night.
Counter Terrorism agencies were facing questions after it emerged Salman Abedi told friends that “being a suicide bomber was okay”, prompting them to call the Government’s anti-terrorism hotline.
Sources suggest that authorities were informed of the danger posed by Abedi on at least five separate occasions in the five years prior to the attack on Monday night. …
This is all old and tired, chronicled on April 4, in “Life With Islam And Its Enablers”:
Be it Stockholm, St. Petersburg, Paris, Nice, Brussels, Berlin; Orlando, or San Bernardino—the men with mass murder on their minds are Muslim, often with criminal records or with a sudden heightened interest in Islam. That risk factor, Islam, is unacknowledged. Its followers are ignored, seldom stopped, and generally dismissed as misguided by the very intelligence agencies now successfully hobbling President Trump.
Posthumously, Jihadi killers are remembered kindly by a conditioned dhimmi community (ours) and by the complicit community (theirs). Nice guys all.
When these characters come to the attention of the authorities, they’re consistently given a pass for their infractions. Invariably are they interviewed and released, unleashed on innocents, because, somehow, they inspired faith in their inquisitors.
The same interrogators are better disposed to prosecuting patriots for impolite speech against Islam. Dutchman Geert Wilders and France’s Marine Le Pen come to mind. Persecuting another, President Donald Trump, for being too polite to Russia is another preferred pastime of Deep-State operatives, who’ll invariably call-off surveillance of Islamists, as they funnel fungible funds into, say, surveilling Trump Tower.