Category Archives: Iraq

Doe a Deer In A Massive Mailbox

Iraq, WMD

Americans are like Australian Marsupials; they’ve developed in isolation, an existential condition that may account for some bizarre traits, such as believing every tall-tale—WMD in Iraq, for instance. So it comes as no surprise that the press has run with a story alleging Virginian Senator George Allen, already a controversial character, caught a deer during his college days, and “after the deer was killed…cut off the doe’s head, asked for directions to the home of the nearest black person and shoved the head into that person’s mailbox.”

Maybe I’m over inquisitive, but my only question is, How on earth did Allen get the deer’s head into a US mailbox?

When Wrong is Still Right

Bush, Iraq, Islam, War

In reply to James Huggins’ letter, posted here, whose stance has been to consistently bash those of us on the Right who opposed the war in Iraq for daring to be right (there’s a nice quote about that tactic. Someone please find it): Now that Iraq is broken, as we said it would be, these individuals continue to heap scorn on us. “What are ya gonna do; let’s be pragmatic. What’s done is done, so unless you have something constructive to say, shut up and let’s get on with the job.”

What job? Does it not occur to you that sometimes things are irreparably broken? Do you really think we can solve the problem of Iraq? Are there no limits to hubristic and delusional thinking? Are there no limits to the defiance of the laws of nature, such as that central planning has NEVER worked; freedom must rise from the roots, it cannot be imposed from the tree tops? Violate rules a school child learns on the playground, and you’ll come up shortalways. And is it worth losing one more American life to the Iraq Moloch? Oh, I forget, we only value fetuses, not fully grown human beings, thousands of whom are hobbling around on prosthetic limbs, lives ruined. Cicero said, “The first law of history is to tell the truth.” Let Huggins and the rest quit the Hussein-equals-Hitler inanities and admit that, while he was by no means a pleasant fellow, he kept Iraq as together as it will ever be. The trains ran on time and Shia and Sunni lived in relative peace in THE SAME NEIGHBORHOODS. There was no civil war (or “civil strife,” as the euphemism goes). In fact, the Iraqis I had met before the war were generally well-educated and had their act together. That simple thing comes from having an infrastructure: law and order, schools, universities, electricity, potable water, hospitals. Mark my words: this war, over which I am constantly castigated, will be responsible for the loss of a generation of young Iraqis. Mark my words (you heard it here first), in a few years time, the lost Iraqi generation will be a topic for discussion among the talking titmice.

Ibn Saud said: “It may be accepted as an incontrovertible fact that it will be impossible to manage the people of Iraq except by strong means and military force.” A prescription Saddam had mastered. The Sultan of Najd (born in 1876; died in 1953) knew of what he spoke.

A Day in the Life…

Iraq

According to the UN, nearly 6,600 civilians were killed in Iraq in two months. What a shame it’s too late to beg Saddam Hussein to take us back and restore law and order to Iraq. We’d promise solemnly never to mess with him again, just so long as he kept his mitts off nukes. Secretly, that’s what anyone with a heart and a head would wish for. This Iraqi boy does. Read about what a day in his life looks like. But then we (who opposed the war, from the get-go, and for all the right reasons) told you so, didn’t we?

Saddam & Bin Laden Sitting in a Tree Kissing…Not

Iraq

Americans—an alarming number of whom believe the government plotted 9/11, presumably with the help of Saddam and bin Laden—were told today what the reality-based community has known since… 2002, which is when I wrote this (vis-à -vis there being no relationship between Hussein and al-Qaida):

Iraq is a secular dictatorship profoundly at odds with Islamic fundamentalism. No less an authority than the former head of the CIA’s counterterrorism office Vincent Cannistraro stated categorically that there was no evidence of Iraq’s links to al-Qaeda. Even the putative Prague meeting between Mohamed Atta, the ringleader of Sept. 11, and Iraqi intelligence, turned out to be bogus. … Lacking proof of Iraqi links to al-Qaeda, Mr. Bush fixed on accusing Iraq of reacquiring chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, as well as long-range ballistic missiles…

However, what truly takes the cake is the response of the Party of Mules to this bit of non-news. Democrats declared ponderously that what we finally have here is information that undermines the president’s case for war. Had these jackasses not voted almost unanimously to give the president the power to take the country to war, they’d not feel the need to pretend there was justification for war with Iraq in the first place.

Or perhaps Pelosi is just retarded. Both rationales are equally plausible.

By the way, by asserting that the presence of Zarqawi in Iraq indicates Hussein gave al-Qaida a nod and a wink, one is also conceding that the presence of terrorists in the US proves they are here with Bush’s tacit approval. Any rational individual, whose reasoning faculties are slightly more developed than Cindy Sheehan’s, knows this is ridiculous.

Selective history is in vogue with the fiction-based community these days—I refer to the administration’s repeated references of late to Lenin and Hitler. Pundits are also generally pig-ignorant. Or if they aren’t, they cultivate historical amnesia when it comes to events that don’t confirm their world-view. Nevertheless, and for anyone who cares for yet another bit of historical evidence of the animus between Hussein and bin Laden: When Iraq occupied Kuwait in 1990, bin Laden petitioned Saudi authorities with a plan to mount an attack on Hussein if he dared to threaten The Kingdom. Bin Laden was furious when the Saudis rebuffed him and turned to the US, instead.