Comments on: Co-op Or Co-optation?

By: Gringo Malo

Gringo Malo — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:34:34 +0000

Actually, we do need health care reform. We need to get the federal government out of the health care business. Regrettably, with sixty Communists, excuse me, Democrats, in the Senate, the reform we need seems unlikely. I'm puzzled as to why there's any need for bipartisanship in this matter.

By: DT

DT — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:10:58 +0000

This administration simply wants to control the cash flow of medicine, not provide better or increased availability of care. No, if you control agriculture (genetically modified foods), control medicine (one payer system) and control energy (cap and trade) you then control a LOT. Game over.

By: james huggins

james huggins — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:45:16 +0000

By the way, the Obama administration is publicly requesting stoolies to report to a white house web site any negative communication, even overheard conversation, about the health care debate. I assume the administration, in the best Marxist tradition, will start “shutting up” those who disagree.

By: james huggins

james huggins — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:18:11 +0000

While everybody is tangled in the thousand pages of confusion, the obvious incredible cost increase, despite government lies to the contrary, and the atrocity tales,true, of substandard health care they are forgetting two thought provoking facts. We don't need health care reform. Also why are the corrupt scoundrels running the government shoving it up our noses so hard. Most people who actually have an opinion on the subject are against this form of health care reform. While Obama and his minions are showing one hand so we can make sure there is nothing up their sleeve they are preparing to pick our pockets with the other hand. Their lies are not even particularly clever. They are obviously blowing smoke because they don't care what the voters think. What's in it for them? There's certainly nothing in it for us.

By: Roy Bleckert

Roy Bleckert — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:22:37 +0000

What baffles me is why a majority of peeps do not get behind the common sense solutions to health care that Michael Tanner has come up with.

But they will trust Captain 0 to run health care, car co. , banks and everything else he wants to take over.

But how can anyone come up with a plausible argument that Capt’n 0 is qualified to run anything when (as Don Jeror pointed out to Majority Leader Steny Hoyer ) it took Capt’n 0 ” six months to pick a dog for his kids ” Unreal.

[I’m not convinced that the dog dilemma is what disqualifies BO.]