Comments on: Condomed By Law https://barelyablog.com/condomed-by-law/ by ilana mercer Wed, 02 Apr 2025 19:29:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: Dan Jeffreys https://barelyablog.com/condomed-by-law/comment-page-1/#comment-17097 Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:05:48 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=32074#comment-17097 Of course, the media arm of the State continues to go to great lengths to not mention the specifics of the charges, instead relying on the vague “sexual assault” title. Another humorous note I saw this morning, Sarah Palin is whining about the hacker attacks on her website as “these people” not respecting the first amendment. Now if that’s not hypocritical I don’t know what is.

Dan

]]> By: Myron Pauli https://barelyablog.com/condomed-by-law/comment-page-1/#comment-17096 Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:23:45 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=32074#comment-17096 The sex is legal but the condom (broken) is illegal! So how the heck can someone prove when the condom (is that People’s Exhibit One??) broke? Beyond a reasonable doubt? Did both parties have to know that the condom was broken?

Has ANYONE ever been convicted under this statue for that sort of allegation?

]]> By: Steve Hogan https://barelyablog.com/condomed-by-law/comment-page-1/#comment-17083 Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:36:56 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=32074#comment-17083 Not being an expert on Swedish law, I’m wondering why only Assange is in jail for this “crime.” It takes two to tango. Why aren’t these women in the slammer too?

Evidently Swedish law is much like American law, where adult females are treated like helpless children and every male is a potential rapist.

]]> By: Myron Pauli https://barelyablog.com/condomed-by-law/comment-page-1/#comment-17081 Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:05:32 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=32074#comment-17081 The charges have an odor about them. It seems that people on both sides are content to elevate Assange into martyr status.

]]>