Comments on: UPDATED: Engorged Organisms & The Porn Aestehtic

By: Robert Glisson

Robert Glisson — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:58:12 +0000

Ilana:

Oscar Mayer now has a new spokesman. [No idea who this is.]

Oscar Mayer hot dogs = Weiner…

By: Roger Chaillet

Roger Chaillet — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:30:10 +0000

Think of the bright side.

Oscar Mayer now has a new spokesman. [No idea who this is.]

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:38:16 +0000

The medical view of pathology confounds me. What is a sociopath, or psychopath?

Didn’t Hanna Arendt and Milgram successfully show that evil is banal, not biological. If it were not true, profiling serial killer childhoods would actually work.

We are bent on destroying the concept of personal choice, both by intent and neglect.

By: Myron Pauli

Myron Pauli — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:45:46 +0000

Of course, most of these politician-porno-cheaters like Weiner are perfectly comfortable with the POLITICAL-SOCIAL EMASCULATION of men – I refer to the uber-cynical Fred Reed’s excellent column on that subject:

http://www.fredoneverything.net/SexualFuture.shtml

By: Myron Pauli

Myron Pauli — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:38:50 +0000

Porn is fine but it is the JUNK FOOD of sexuality – real romance needs love and respect (and in my case, an intelligent soulmate).

As for the appropriately named WEINER, in the synagogue his aunt sometimes attends, we learned a few commandments yesterday including something concerning adultery. Huda Abedin, his Pak-Indo Saudi-educated pregnant wife photographs well but she does look 1 falafel away from anorexia:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/new-york-times-anthony-weiners-wife-is-pregnant/

and perhaps the super-thin are not as uninhibited in bed as a pleasingly plump Lewinsky jumping up and down with multiple orgasms. The advantage of monogamy is to prevent spouses from engaging in “comparison shopping”. Weiner respects his marriage like he respects the Constitution (e.g. not at all).

Nevertheless, Weiner is a TZADDIK (righteous soul) compared to the Scumbag-In-Chief John Edwards who had his wife take (cancer accelerating) fertility hormones in late middle age to pop out a replacement for his (tragically) lost son and subsequently fathers a bastard son out of wedlock while his wife is dying of cancer and then maneuvers to cover it up. Compared to Newt, Slick Willie, Barney Frank, Spitzer, and Weiner, no one tops Edwards.

By: Abelard Lindsey

Abelard Lindsey — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:36:53 +0000

The liberal establishment—it includes Republicans and Democrats—has accepted that all bad behavior is a disease. From lying to murder: every bit of human nastiness is said to be a biological-based disorder. The premise for this conceit is the Rousseauist notion that humans are all equally good and would remain pristine if not for external agents, namely biological or societal forces.

This is because liberals do not believe in accountability. They do not believe anyone should accountable for anything at all. This is also the purpose of all bureaucracy, which is to shield everyone in it from any kind of accountability.

By: Robert Glisson

Robert Glisson — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:38:55 +0000

When I went to a Catholic University in the early seventies, the Criminology professor extorted the theories of a Socialist Theorist (not political socialist) whose name escapes me. However, the important aspect of his theory was that we are all exposed to different behaviors everyday, but responsible for the one we accept.ie, its not the gun, its the person pulling the trigger. My Franciscan ethics instructor stated that life was a series of ‘Y’ decisions. ie every decision leads to a choice and we become responsible for that choice and the subsequent decisions that it leads too. Both theories come to the same conclusion- it ain’t nobody’s fault but his own.

By: Michael Marks

Michael Marks — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:38:12 +0000

PS your book is on its way and I’m looking forward to reading it. I expect it to be a good read that will: 1) challenge some of my preconcieved notions about apathied, 2) challenge me in ways I don’t expect, 3) make me further appriciate the founders respect for private property, and 4) further confirm my observations and thoughts on multiculturalism.

By: Michael Marks

Michael Marks — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:29:30 +0000

I must not be much of an American Male. The four most attractive women I know, (including my wife) are relatively petite, well proportioned (in the classical Greek sense, not “busting out all over”), have beautiful eyes, and outgoing personalities. My wife has the most beautiful dark brown eyes I’ve ever seen and she has a smile that “lights up the room”. None of these women would fit the porn look. [I love brown eyes the most: the color of my daughter’s enormous, doe-like eyes.]

Do I notice women who have the porn look? Sure, I’d be lying if I didn’t admit that. If I were single would I chase a woman with the “porn look”? Not bloody likely!

Let me also say that I find your dark intense eys and facial features attractive as well.

One of the women I mentioned above is divorced she indicated that her husband “slept around”. They had five children together. I saw her recently for the first time since 1972. She still looks beautiful. She is probably more interesting and engaging than when I knew her ‘back in the day”. I wondered what kind of a guy would sleep around on this woman. I sure wouldn’t have!

I sometimes wonder if men like Congressman Weiner pursue women like hunters. However, instead of mounting their trophies on the wall these men mount thier trophies in the bedroom, or virtually on the internet.

By: james huggins

james huggins — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:41:17 +0000

These “lapses” in judgement from prominent men are no mystery. These men think they are above the rules we regular types have to follow. Their egos and lack of scruples make them slaves to their urges. I also like classy women. Of course statuesque doesn’t hurt either. Anybody out there remember Julie Newmar?