Comments on: UPDATED: ‘Justice Brennan’s Footnote Gave Us Anchor Babies’

By: NJ_Patriot

NJ_Patriot — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:00:08 +0000

Myron, maybe you can produce even one statement where anyone, idiot or otherwise, indicates that Republicans are perfect and should rule the planet in any sense.

While we’re waiting for you to produce those supporting facts, I can say that if Republicans had been in sole possession of political power for the last 50 or 100 years, the country would be in immeasurably better (if not perfect) shape today. To deny that makes one an idiot by any definition.

By: Myron Pauli

Myron Pauli — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:07:50 +0000

By the way, the gay judge in Perry v. Schwarzenegger was a Reagan/Bush appointee – so all those “if only Republicans ruled the planet” idiots should just zip it!

By: Myron Pauli

Myron Pauli — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:06:37 +0000

Good column by Ann – I wonder if there is a response. In any case, even if the baby is a citizen, the parents should be deported and the baby put up for adoption if the parents don’t want to take the baby back (in which case, the baby is no longer “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”). So either there is a new adopted baby for American parents or the baby heads back to YaYaLand.

As for the welfare state – end it, don’t mend it!

As for idiot judges, I am more convinced in the efficacy of impeachment – one or two examples will get the judiciary into line! For example, the one (of two) openly gay Federal judge gets to overturn ALL state constitutions based on “modern understandings” and “international law” – I don’t care much either way on gay marriage but idiotic judges will ruin whatever remnant of limited government and local autonomy still exists.

By: NJ_Patriot

NJ_Patriot — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 22:37:33 +0000

God bless Ann Coulter. As far as my experience goes, she has never been wrong, only less right in a few circumstances. She has more substantive balls than most in government (all Democrats and almost all Republicans). And that includes the phony audaciousness of king Obama.
Her simple and unassailable explanation of the 14th amendment should not require an intellectual defense of any kind, but as we just witnessed in the California prop 8 case, the written constitution is no longer of particular relevance in this once great country.

By: james huggins

james huggins — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:07:58 +0000

Boy, is my face red. You must have posted those articles during the time I was taking my sabbatical at the top of the Matterhorn where I was contemplating my navel and pondering the meaning of life.

By: Jamie

Jamie — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:07:14 +0000

Nominated by Eisenhower to pander to New England liberals in an election year. All hail the GOP.

By: james huggins

james huggins — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:40:57 +0000

Shame on me but I wasn’t aware of the origins of the 14th amendment or the 1982 action. Is it too late to do anything about it? Probably so as I’m sure some set in stone precedent is now in effect and can only be rescinded by some sort of amendment to the Constitution. I certainly don’t want to start throwing amendments around because with today’s political, social climate we would probably end up with rhesus monkeys getting the vote. I guess we are stuck with the “anchor babies”. A revolting development.

[Double shame, b/c this writer has written about the 14th. Search the articles archive.]