Comments on: Updated: The Gaseous One’s Energy Policies ($9.4 Trillion Poorer) https://barelyablog.com/obamas-gaseous-energy-policies/ by ilana mercer Wed, 02 Apr 2025 19:29:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: fishydude https://barelyablog.com/obamas-gaseous-energy-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6237 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:42:40 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=10581#comment-6237 Is the environmental policy all part of his health cost reduction plan?

Examples of what sort of “cost containment” actions will be taken under Obama Care can be seen in Oregon.
Not long after voters legalized assisted suicide, the state added it as an acceptable treatment option for cancer. Patients deemed to be too expensive to treat are sent letters saying that chemo is denied but assisted suicide will be paid for. Remember the case of Barbara Wagner?
Of course, the proponents of “right to die” laws said this would never happen. And then it did. And then Washington legalized assisted suicide.
I predict that a federal “right to die” law will be snuck in as an amendment and then followed by denial of any treatment for illnesses that have a “low cure rate.” Killing one’s self will become the new patriotism.

Add to all of this the push for smaller, lighter and less safe cars and you have yet another element in the plan to reduce health care expenses. Crash fatalities cost less to treat than crash survivors. The nuts is congress are even trying to ram through mandates for 70MPG. Of course, this will kill even more people since families will have to take two cars and a trailer to go anywhere. Or 4 scooters.
They must understand that if they mandate cars too small for a family that families are forced to buy trucks. That’s what happened when CAFÉ killed the station wagon. And taking two cars that get 50MPG each is the same net MPG of taking one SUV that get 25.
Taking two Dumb cars that get 40MPH to fit my kids and a small amount of stuff is the same as taking my 1999 Cherokee with 175K miles that still gets 20MPG even loaded with 500 pounds of stuff plus the wife and two kids.
So they must therefore want to increase fatalities to decrease health care costs. It is the only logical explanation.

]]>
By: M. B. Moon https://barelyablog.com/obamas-gaseous-energy-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6234 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:46:21 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=10581#comment-6234 Reliance on wind energy: Those dang windmills will require expensive maintenance. But that is just fine, I suppose, because of all the new maintenance “jobs” it will result in.

Idiots; life is not a “make work” proposition.

]]>
By: Myron Pauli https://barelyablog.com/obamas-gaseous-energy-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6233 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:48:48 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=10581#comment-6233 Even ignoring the constitutional issues (which I generally do NOT do), the net effects of the Obammunistic policies in energy, environment, and medical care are to: (a) make things worse by creating and rationing scarcity AND
(b) increase government power and dependency upon that governmental power.

]]>