UPDATE III: Oz Is Alright, Economically (Electorally? Now That’s Another Matter)

Debt,Economy,Elections,Inflation,Political Economy

            

PBS reporter Stuart Cohen “thinks” that what has kept Australia’s “unemployment rate just over 5 percent,” and that country’s economy still humming,” is, in part, “government spending”—that has “helped keep Australia out of recession.”

“PETER HARTCHER, political editor, of he Sydney Morning Herald,” believes the same: “The big and searing experience out of this was that, when there was a global financial crisis, and suddenly countries everywhere were in trouble, the Australian government had enough money in the kitty that it was easily able to enact a massive stimulus massive at least in proportion to our economy.

The consequence is one of the only countries in the world that didn’t have a recession. And this experience has now been burnt into the national consciousness, and it’s put a real premium on getting back to surpluses as quickly as possible.”

[SNIP]

HARTCHER’s right about not overspending. Most people outside Washington DC would think of this as stating the obvious. But it is despite the pursuit of porkulus policies that Oz is not looking as bad as the US. The relative prudent financial management of the country’s affairs has meant that the economy can shoulder some Keynesian mischief without buckling under.

UPDATE I (Aug. 21): For those of you who are interested in events outside the USA (not a common occurrence among Americans, in my experience), here is a dispatch from the frontlines of the Australian election. I’ll provide the name of our lively correspondent, whose style you probably recognize, pending his say-so. UPDATE III (Aug. 22): He is no other than R. J. Stove (read his comment and corrections hereunder):

I woke up this morning to the news that yesterday’s election seems to have resulted in a hung parliament (the first at national level since 1940-1943).

The obnoxious Gillard – “Sickening Excuse For A Woman” (SEFAW for short), as Paul Gottfried calls her – has been given a kick in the teeth, but Tony Abbott’s Liberals (despite gains in Queensland and New South Wales) appear unable to form a majority.

It’s the Green party which is cock-a-hoop, with, I believe, nine senators now (as opposed to five previously) and with gains in the House of Reps (where it had lacked any members at all since the
1990s, if memory serves me).

Last night on TV we had the diverting spectacle of Gillard’s vile Environment Minister Penny Wong, who owes her political clout entirely to being a Chinese lesbian, being upbraided by a Greens candidate for “homophobia.” Frankly, to me the Greens are such cartoonish villains that I can’t work up all that much indignation against them.

If we absolutely must have pro-abort, pro-Third-World-immigration and pro-homosexual-“marriage” politicians at all, I prefer them to be outside rather than inside the Catholic Church or “movement conservatism.”

This is some of the latest media coverage of the poll (complete with a recording of Gillard’s cement-mixer speaking
voice).

[SNIP]

UPDATE II: By comparison, “the number of Americans filing for unemployment benefits increased by 12,000 to 500,000 last week, taking economists and the White House by surprise. President Obama, on his way to a 10-day vacation with his family on Martha’s Vineyard, said the report underscores the need for”… yes, more government deficit spending.”

5 thoughts on “UPDATE III: Oz Is Alright, Economically (Electorally? Now That’s Another Matter)

  1. james huggins

    As I am obviously simple-minded I usually only can come up with simple answers. The more a government stays out of the public’s business the stronger the economy. That means minimum regulatory interference and less taxation. The fewer interfering rules and regulations, usually put in for ideological reasons anyway, the more freedom business has to flourish. The fewer taxes there are the more financial activity there is and the more “deficit reducing” revenue there is for the doofuses in Washington to waste. To actually look the public in the eye and state that bills like the health care boondoggle will actually reduce the deficit is an insult to our collective intelligence. Now I haven’t said anything new here. The readers of this blog have heard these things forever, whether some agree or not, but as I said I am into simple answers.

  2. Derek

    I wish PBS would do a comparison between Oz and Uncle Sam on how they harvest their fruit crops. Maybe it would change their opinions on the benefits of illegal immigration.

  3. R. J. Stove

    I’m very grateful to Ilana Mercer for reproducing my remarks (yes, it was I who originally wrote them) about the current Australian electoral stalemate. But it’s a pity that Peter Hartcher and so many others in the local mass media are still spouting their codswallop about Australia having “only” a 5% unemployment rate. This blague has long been overdue for contemptuous rejection.

    Successive governments have arrived at such absurdly optimistic figures through making (unlike their European counterparts) the statistical assumption that every Australian adult who does merely one hour of paid work per week is just as “fully employed” as an Australian adult who does 40 or 60 or 80 hours of paid work. As Melbourne researcher Marcus L’Estrange has been saying for years, if you look at the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ own figures (which get extremely little publicity) for “persons not in the labor force”, the true jobless rate is nearer 20%: fully comparable with what America fesses up to having.

    http://www.henrythornton.com/article.asp?article_id=4473

  4. james huggins

    Per the remarks above about Australia’s “true” uemployment numbers:
    “Figures lie and liars figure.”

Comments are closed.