Comments on: 'Palinomania & Sanford-Phobia' https://barelyablog.com/palinomania-sanford-phobia-2/ by ilana mercer Wed, 02 Apr 2025 19:29:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: Van Wijk https://barelyablog.com/palinomania-sanford-phobia-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14869 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:09:15 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=11458#comment-14869 From what I’ve been reading and hearing, you would think that the candidacy of John McCain never happened. And now we have John McCain II, with a different accent and nicer legs.

So it’s official: the lame-duck Republican Party learned nothing from the last election. It deserves to be crushed.

]]>
By: Barbara Grant https://barelyablog.com/palinomania-sanford-phobia-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14868 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:39:16 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=11458#comment-14868 Gottfried writes:

“Within minutes of Sarah’s resignation speech, I learned that as a “working mother” the Alaska governor did not want to sacrifice her children (including presumably the one who got pregnant by the jock) for her political career and that she was hanging tough and planning to go on teaching us “values.””

Dare I suggest that something hypocritical might be going on here? I admit, I was somewhat surprised that the Christian mother of a special needs newborn would accept an invitation to run for high office in 2008. I believe I’ve since heard Palin say, on TV, that she’d have to see how her kids are doing before weighing a Presidential run in 2012; but perhaps that’s only my imagination.

What kind of message does this send to Christian (and other) mothers? Part of it, I suppose, is that as a “pro-lifer” you don’t abort; but after you give birth, hey, throw the kid to the nearest neighbor (or relative) and get on with the “higher calling” of your career.

In my judgment, Palin is all about the business of “climbing a ladder,” and has little substance.

]]>
By: Myron Pauli https://barelyablog.com/palinomania-sanford-phobia-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14867 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:25:37 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=11458#comment-14867 Gottfried nailed that one. Some of our better Presidents (Jefferson, Cleveland, Harding, even arguably budget-balancing Clinton) were or might have been involved in non-marital relationships. Then there are great moral upholders of marriage such as Grant, Truman, Nixon, and both Bushes – warmongers who were faithful to their wives. Frankly, the Palin worshippers love her for the enemies she has made even if she is a philosophical blank-slate and an ambitious hottie who can’t keep a reliable Excel spread sheet of her Governor’s expenses, keep her family off the front pages, articulate principles of limited government, or complete her term of office.

Neocons adore Givemhell Harry Truman, the innovator of UN-sponsored “police actions” and indefinite “undeclared wars” (Korea) – a family man and uninhibited warmonger who despised wimps like J. Robert Oppenheimer for articulating regrets over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Sanford brazenly defiled the great “family values” of the Christian Socialist (Yeehaw Huckabee) wing of the Fox Republican Neocon Party so he must be excommunicated. With those awful love letters, Sanford is politically deader than a doornail. Right now, it looks like a 2012 rematch between Ken-doll Mitt and whomever the Christian Socialists settle on – Sistah Sarah or the Huckster.

]]>
By: JP Strauss https://barelyablog.com/palinomania-sanford-phobia-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14866 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:26:09 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=11458#comment-14866 What I was trying to say is that having a “Manchurian candidate” is obviously working for the left and the pseudo-right, so why not the real right?

]]>
By: JP Strauss https://barelyablog.com/palinomania-sanford-phobia-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14865 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:24:20 +0000 http://barelyablog.com/?p=11458#comment-14865 If what you say is true (and I have no reason to doubt it), at least ms Palin is not a factor anymore.

Here’s an idea: get a young tart and teach her to recite libertarian doctrine and have her run for VP along with Ron Paul come next election. [There are some such lightweight sweet things being paraded in libertarian circles.]

An even better Idea is to have a Mixed-race(tm) pairing running for office and have a group of shadowy libertarians running things in the background. This was done quite effectively in South Africa for ten years with the SA Commy Party dictating policy and our then president acting like a sock puppet. The idea is to have candidates with appealing looks and sexy voices telling you what you want to hear and leaving the actual work to the “philosophers”. [Practically, such a conspiracy can’t work, b/c democracy prevents a proper application of libertarian. constitutional principles.]

]]>