Comments on: Paul In Black, White & Pink

By: derek

derek — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:13:53 +0000

Why does Alan Dershowitz have to do this? He is linking Paul to deniers and anti-Semites. Every powerful group from GOP to the Dems is bringing out the kitchen sink in trying to sink Ron Paul. Paul is either the worst man of the twenty-first century, or he is actually correct and threatens too many entrenched interests, your pick.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:06:25 +0000

Just some follow-up... A Detroit radio personality, Mark Scott (RIP), years ago voiced that only PROPERTY OWNERS should be allowed to vote since they, as a group, would have the most to lose, a position your book takes. If Cannibal's Pot is any indication, Scott was right. What is in place now is the equivalent of voting to reinstate slavery just because a majority of voters approved of it. It no longer matters that it is a violation of freedom, a violation of the Constitution, and is barbaric. O's appointment of Cordray...Cordray has stated that the new Consumer Protection group overrides the Constitution! Myron, your daughter, grandkids, etc. must be educated about this impending disaster and reject the Keynesian / Krugman B.S. If not, the theft will get worse, e.g. Today, Fannie and Freddie getting more power to lend more non-existent money to sub-par borrowers. ps: Glisson...High Five back at ya!

By: My RON-PAUL i

My RON-PAUL i — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:06:13 +0000

(1) It is not so much guilt as ANGER as I have a daughter and I feel sorry for young people whom we are ENSLAVING with DEBT. Yes, the politicians promised all of us “non-existent” money as Napolitano points out – but one day, this system has got to be changed.

(2) Demographic ironies – many libertarians and conservatives love immigration of “coolie” immigrants into the US who then, in turn support socialism. On the flip side, leftists generally love abortion – and blacks have 4 times the abortion rate of whites (for Hispanics, it is 2x). Two different examples of slowly modifying the electorate against ones own interests.

By: Robert Glisson

Robert Glisson — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:20:36 +0000

Abelard: Please go to http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul_Immigration.htm Here is Ron Paul on Immigration. Please read the whole thing; Mr. Paul gives an explanation of everything. He explains in detail and if you can still get the “Pro-Immigration” concept out of that, I’ll send you a cigar.

Myron: I said; “numbers are not the problem as much as the system.” When the country first started, only certain parties could vote. One, needs to have a system of voting that allows the “providers” and not the “takers” to handle the purse strings. I’m not proposing a form of government, just pointing out something else to consider. High five Dennis.

By: Abelard Lindsey

Abelard Lindsey — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:04:08 +0000

The interesting thing is that Ron Paul, himself, is pro-immigration.

By: Robert Glisson

Robert Glisson — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:39:44 +0000

“How is a productive, smart person like yourself stealing from someone who has never worked a day in his or her life? What’s with these pangs of liberal guilt?]” I don’t know what Myron would/will answer; but, I know of at least one blog site that often lambasts the ‘Baby Boomer Generation’ for our use of Social Security, and Medicare. It’s all, our fault and from the tone of a lot of the commentators, we need weed the older generation out. Just because we paid into the programs doesn’t count; it’s because they were instituted by the congressmen we elected and we are cheating the younger generation out of their inheritance. We are called “Greedy” as a lesser insult to what they really think of us. So, Myron, I can relate. I don’t feel guilty; I’m going to sit on my big ol candy mountain of SS and gloat though. When we quit sending the Palestinians money to buy Chinese rockets, um-m… maybe.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:12:51 +0000

FYI

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0112/napolitano.php3

Would anyone feel guilty about recovering – or even “stealing back” – money fraudulently taken or forcefully stolen from you by thieves? Not me!

By: Dennis

Dennis — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:52:07 +0000

Hello Fred, Radical Constitutionalists are out there, but their voices are not heeded since “Rule of Law and the Republic” cries mean little to those who seek to bleed others.

Hello RP, I addressed SocSec, etc a few years ago in a reply or email to Ilana. Since you have no choice other than fines, penalties, forfeitures, and jail – nor does your employer – then I believe IT IS SELF-DEFENSE of your financial situation to file and to accept the INSURANCE BENEFITS YOU HAVE PAID FOR, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY VIA YOUR EMPLOYER, without guilt!

Concerning the other points, does “ANTHEM” ring a bell? “VIRTUE OF SELFISHNESS”?

REMEMBER: It is the Government and the Politicians who have broken the Covenant with the Citizens of the U.S.

By: My RON-PAUL i

My RON-PAUL i — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:16:12 +0000

(1) Ilana – ignoring my specific case – some “generic” baby boomer, “Elvis Ringo”, has been “contributing” (at gunpoint) into Social(ist) (in)Security for 30 plus years and now gets told that retirement age has been pushed to 70 or higher – – – PLUS with looming deficit/inflation endangering any independent “savings” that he might have put aside, Elvis feels compelled to work another 5 or 10 years. Thus, his position at XX University or YY Corporation does not become “available” to some young person. Additionally, that young person eventually has to PAY for Elvis’s retirement because Elvis’s “contributions” were dropped on Saddam or payed for a previous generation’s retirement. Hence I feel somewhat guilty that “one generation has a right to bind another” (this is a quote from Thomas Jefferson):

http://mises.org/daily/1419

Social Security and Medicare have become the chains to bind the next generation – perhaps they will realize it. If it takes an alliance of young dope smoking “leftist libertarians” and old Christian “rightist libertarians” to restore freedom, I have no problems there.

(2) Robert Glisson – some people think that Jews have high IQ’s and high incomes but they tend to vote for some of the worst statist wealth confiscators.

By: Fred Cummins

Fred Cummins — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:45:47 +0000

I would say at this juncture that logic is not going to play. We need a radical Constitutionalist to bring on the conflict or revolution. Paul is the only person to do that and if it is not done we can put our blogs and liberties away forever. I believe that we are at THE Crossroad not A Crossroad.