The Qurayza were fought and then defeated in battle, and then were allowed an arbitrator to decide their punishment. Muhammad suggested Sa’d ibn Mua’dh, a leading man among Aws, a Jewish tribe that converted to Islam, whom they believed would judge in their favour, and hence agreed to. However, he passed an execution sentence against the Qurayza and 600-900 Qurayza men were beheaded (except for the few who chose to convert to Islam), all women and children enslaved, and their properties confiscated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_and_Jews

A more politcally correct version:

http://www.pbs.org/muhammad/ma_jews.shtml

Back in anthro grad school I encountered a “multiculturalist” looking for previously unblamed white people to tar with the racist brush, and he picked the Swedes. Specifically, he accused them of being mean to Gypsies.

I remarked that people who leave their houses with doors and windows wide open to air them out, might get a tad upset when bands of theives pass through.

“How can you call them theives?” he asked, outraged.

“Uh, give me a hint. Is it because they take things that don’t belong to them?” I replied.

“Well that’s just their culture.”

“Yes, and in my culture we lock people like that up. So why is it OK for everybody but us to defend out culture?”

I further pointed out that among the Roma, stealing from another Rom was punished not by a brief confinement, but by lifelong exile.

We still do not want Islamification of our society. For example, in 1973 we hardly had any private schools for example. Now one in eight children is in a private school, kindergarten etc.

And this development is accelerating. People will do whatever it takes to avoid Islamic influence.

That actually goes for the non-Muslim immigrant’s as well. They all assimilate just fine.

The problem is not immigration as such. The problem is Islam.