It will still be an amazing feat if the Republicans can retain the Presidency in spite of 8 years of war, spending orgies, inflation, incompetence, etc. My favorite chutzpah statement was Laura Bush (last week) berating Burma for their incompetent response to a tropical cyclone (hurricane). Perhaps she should have said, “Than Shwe, you’re doing a hell of a job”.

Anyway, the Democrats have generally had trouble winning the Presidency. Only 3 Democrats in history ever won with over 51% of the vote – Jackson, FDR, and LBJ.

I guess since Bill Clinton governed as a centrist, the conservative democrats fear Hillary less than Barry Hussein Obama.

The combo of McCain and a Democratic Congress, however, may be the continuation of the War (Mc Cain’s # 1 cause) WITH additional socialistic programs domestically.

Gun owning Democrats for Clinton? How completely blind do you have to be to ignore that Clinton is the candidate most likely to end all remaining gun rights? In my judgment social democrats (small or large “d”) are almost ubiquitously people that hold fundamental fallacies about the way politics functions and what government is capable of accomplishing, so they chose the political position in this country that feels “safest” since Lincoln and certainly FDR. And such people are the primary benefactors of the God that Failed, the tool of the Gang of Thieves Writ Large.

Let’s get real: Obama’s supporters are latte-sipping kids with Che tee shirts (reading Chomsky is optional, but highly corollary). Clinton’s supporters are sub-100 IQ small-towners and soccer moms who want the government to steal your money and give it to them (and/or their ethanol farms).