Comments on: UPDATED: Author Replies to Amazon Reviews of ‘Into The Cannibal’s Pot’

By: JP

JP — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:27:42 +0000

CF manages to break the record for logical error density by committing nine logical errors in his review, namely
the Ad Hominem,
genetic,
Ecological,
False attribution,
Kettle logic,
Mind Projection,
Psychologist’s,
The good ole straw man and
Argumentum ad populum fallacies.

[Good points to post on Amazon, JP.]

By: Contemplationist

Contemplationist — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:45:13 +0000

I don’t get it. Was your father involved in dismantling White rule in SA or not? Its a simple question. Were jews disproportionately involved in this “anti-racist” effort or not? I’m an admirer of the Jewish people and Israel, and I want to know answers to these simple questions. Do you think that makes me an anti-semitic genocidalist or what? Why can’t we have a rational debate about facts no matter how uncomfortable or detestable they may be while retaining our classical liberal leanings?

By: Nebojsa Malic

Nebojsa Malic — Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:53:19 +0000

So far, all the complaints about the book I’ve seen come from people whose prejudices and preconceptions have been upset by the factual presentation therein. That’s only to be expected – indeed, is a testimony that the book’s arguments are right on target.

By: George Pal

George Pal — Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:14:16 +0000

To those for whom life is a zero-sum game the insufficiency of one is always the result of the proficiency of others. The compassionate fascist has left none for me; as a result I’m left to coldly conclude he and his ilk are irredeemable fools.