In your “How Things Would Work in a Copyright-Free Universe” you write:

“The copyright system ought to be abolished because there can be no justification for the use of force against legitimate property owners. And force is, very plainly, what flows from the enforcement of the law. Since ideas should not be treated as property, laws that aggress against those who have not violated person or property are wrong.”

In your “Terms of Use” you write:

“The foregoing is legally binding; copyright infringement is a felony.”

I can’t square the two. Am I missing something. [I’ve updated the post in anticipation of such questions]