Comments on: UPDATE II: @Twitter, Trayvon Was “NO_LIMIT_NIGA” (The Latest, Feral, 10-Against-One Assault)

By: Roger Chaillet

Roger Chaillet — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:47:16 +0000

If Zimmerman is a “white” Hispanic, then is Barack Obama a white mulatto?

By: David B

David B — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 17:04:20 +0000

Excellent piece Ilana! I think we all may need to start getting our televised news from RT since our national media is in the continual habit of using its power and influence to set the national agenda — even if it has to lie to do it.

Re Eric’s comment, Zimmerman had every right to follow Martin to see what he was doing in the neighborhood whether or not he was advised by the police to not do so. I would think a neighborhood watchman would do such things.

Who got in who’s face we don’t know. We weren’t there. Did Zimmerman act in self defense or not? That is the crucial question.

By: Myron Pauli

Myron Pauli — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:27:23 +0000

Unarmed 16 year old American “white” kid killed by order of a (half) black man! Will Rev. Al lead demos? Will there be calls for lynchings? Will we have idiotic debates whether the kid was wearing a hoodie or a push-up bra? As Orwell would say – all people are equal but some people are more equal than others.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2097899,00.html

… and here’s a bonus for the Birther (Bertha??) movement:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/documents/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-birth-certificate.html

As for blacks attacking Hispanics (or others), that was obviously “caused by white racism” – get with the PC, bro!

By: irongalt

irongalt — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:47:58 +0000

Who wants to bet that in the same scenario, if Zimmerman was a (public/oink sector) cop instead of a (private sector) watchman, that there would be little to no “controversy” surrounding this at all – and furthermore there would be a media blackout surrounding the whole case?

By: irongalt

irongalt — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:32:05 +0000

@ By Robert Glisson on 03.30.12 3:34 pm – Good points. Short of self-defense, the neighborhood watches are probably the closest america will ever get to the private production of defense.

Judging from the decedent’s lewd and violent tweets, the chances of him having initiated the conflict are astronomically high. At the risk of sounding cold: good riddance.

@ My RON PAUL i on 03.30.12 5:38 pm – Well, Martin’s end was not met as a “penalty”…it was met as a consequence of initiating a conflict with a more worthy opponent.

By: My RON PAUL i

My RON PAUL i — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 01:38:21 +0000

I conditionally agree with Eric that Zimmerman (who apparently is the Exalted Cyclops of the KKK http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2548350/posts ) MAY have initiated the fracas by confronting Martin. Whether Martin was wearing a hoodie or a push-up bra doesn’t raise “reasonable suspicion” into “imminent danger” – but I use the word MAY because that is what must be considered by civil and/or criminal juries.

Zimmerman MAY have done some wrong actions. Martin MAY have done something criminal prior to his being killed (being an idiot teenager does not per se merit the death penalty). But what is certain is that the Sharpton et al RIC machine (including Spike Lee and others threatening all Zimmermans they can find!) is that they are INDISPUTABLE RACE HUCKSTERS.

More on all the black crime victims killed by blacks (of no concern to the RIC) :

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm

http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~roos/Courses/grstat502/phillipssp802.pdf

As for the Messianic son of the spousal cheating 23 year old Kenyan who banged a 17 year old college Freshman and then abandoned his (polygamistic) wife and son within one year – I guess the white-reared son has a lot to resent those evil racist whities…

Here is a typical “anti-racist” web site saying how the Trayon Martin GENOCIDE proves “The caucasian race is not superior in any way whatsoever. As I said above, you could not take care of your own lives without the help of the very people you despise. You are an inferior race.”

http://theobamacrat.com/2012/03/11/we-aint-overcome-yet/

By: Robert Glisson

Robert Glisson — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:34:41 +0000

“Martin had not done anything that warranted being stalked by Zimmerman or anyone else.” Eric: I have a problem with this wording. ‘Neighborhood watch means just that “Watch” The neighborhood south of me has ‘Neighborhood watch’ It is a mixed neighborhood, Black, Oriental, and White. When a stranger comes into that neighborhood, he or she will get checked out and who knows what color the checker will be. My problem with your sentence was the word “Stalked” Zimmerman was a watchman, it was his duty to check out suspicious persons. Martin was not a resident of that community. He had been suspended from school where his mother lived, and was visiting his father at his father’s girlfriend’s home. There had been burglaries in the area, why shouldn’t he have checked the stranger. When I was a Probation Officer, I enjoyed making visits to the south side. If someone had moved without telling me, I only had to stop my car at the first citizen I saw on the sidewalk and ask where my client was. I got directions instantly. That’s the way it is in ‘Neighborhood watch’ Everyone watches out for their neighbors. He didn’t stalk, he just did his job. That don’t make him innocent, just not a stalker.

By: John Danforth

John Danforth — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:24:14 +0000

Now Sharpton is threatening a race riot if Zimmerman isn’t arrested. As I mentioned above.

By: John Danforth

John Danforth — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:49:32 +0000

The media campaign advances a pragmatist’s contempt for reason, facts, logic, and truth. They appeal to hatred, envy, and nihilistic indignant passion, all wrapped up in a nice hairball.

The Neocons are defenseless against a campaign like this because they advance their own agenda based on pragmatism. So they are reduced to whimpering about letting everything come out in a trial, by jury, and so on (yeah, I saw the Hannity show last night). Translation: they are willing to turn process on its head and give the race-hate bloodsuckers what they want — to have a man charged with a crime based on the success of their attempt to excite a mob rather than on the evidence. To hell with the idea that no charges will be forthcoming if there is no evidence of a crime.

Thesis, antithesis, synthesis. The more ‘reasonable’ position is that if you defend yourself you will be tried for murder. Thanks a lot to those Neocon cretins who pretend to be more objective than their opponents in the pooflinging fight on Fox. I guess if you can remain silent while Americans are executed by the President (based on calculation of the probable backlash or rather the success of the PR campaign to demonize them) then something like this is to be expected.

By: james huggins

james huggins — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:24:51 +0000

Enough rhetoric and theory. Let’s get to the basics. If I’ve been slugged in the nose and knocked down and am having my head smashed into the sidewalk I have two choices. Either let my brains be bashed out on the curb or do something to protect myself. If I’m armed he is going to get an unpleasant surprise.