Here is another News Site straight from the source and it mentions a rape problem and the rape ‘with scissors’ at the bottom. This one is all in English.

http://www.65degreesnorth.com/content/view/253/54/

http://www.kaleva.fi/plus/index.cfm?j=621642

(Translation from friend in Finland)

3 Congolese immigrants gang raped a Finnish woman in Oulu (northern Finland), they made fistula on her using scissors in the Congo fashion, clipping up the skin between anal and vaginal openings, which means she will have to wear diapers if they can’t fix it with surgery (and in any cases, it’s impossible to fix it, many victims of this attack in Congo had to use colostomy bags for the rest of their life.

Furthermore, They raped 2 other women in the same Finnish city, they targeted single women at bus stops, hit them in the head with a hard object and dragged them somewhere to rape them. The other women were lucky enough to be just raped, not permanently mutilated.

The Congo Immirgrants were sentenced to 4 year jail sentences.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fOIoi1g1vE

(this stuff is for strong stomachs. I had never heard of a Fistula. Don’t look it up around dinner time.)

Were are the Women Rights groups on this?!!!? This horrible stuff but someone has to write and Blog about it.

[Where is the proof that this has happened in Finland? Provide a link to a credible news story, please.]

Here, a very interesting article in the wake of the murder of SA Anglo-Zulu War historian David Rattray. Please note the fourth paragraph from the bottom: several business leaders, determined to wage a campaign to draw attention to SA’s crime problem, did not do so after meeting with SA President Mbeki.

To the foreign observer, it appears that the SA government is not serious about addressing the issue of crime, and prefers instead the ostrich posture of head buried in the sand.

[Thanks, B. After reading this, I think the family/wife are the real liberal ostriches. The government is just a gang of gangsters.]

If we extend the analogy to society at large, consisting of humans who must survive through the use of intelligence rather than brute force alone, then it seems to me that a defect in thought processes could be considered an illness that could likewise weaken the formerly strong, with similar consequences.

Dr. Root points out altruistic behavior as one differentiator between human and animal behavior and uses it as an example to deconstruct professor Makgoba’s argument in his excellent piece.

Taking this in a different direction, I would posit that it is the distinctly human rational faculty that separates mankind from other life forms. And if we strictly define altruism as the idea that the undeserving are entitled to the unearned (and therefore irrational), then it could be argued that belief in altruism as a guiding principle might qualify as a sort of thought-virus that weakens the stronger members of a society if this principle as defined here is taken literally and put into action.

So while I agree that altruism is a strictly human concept, I think perhaps it is an illness that can be used as a tool by the least able to subjugate the most able.

Obviously, the term “altruism” is not so strictly defined by most people, being a blurry concept equated with ‘kindness’ in general usage. But whenever the unearned is granted to the undeserving as a matter of moral principle, injustice is the inescapable result.

If the most able members of society are thus intellectually disarmed from resisting, then the least able, with a confident sense of entitlement, can and will eventually substitute force for reason. The result is that relations between members or groups are reduced to the level of primate behavior. The larger the scale, the more horrifying the results.

–John Danforth–

The article is superb. This is what they (the politicians) are also doing here in India too, in the name of “affirmative action” and “social justice.”

At a reasonably deep level, I feel that “darwinism” and “civilized behaviour” are opposite of each other. Darwnism is: “I (Me) first”. Civilized behaviour rests on the notion,”You (Not I) first”. In Darwinism one “competes” and in “civilized behaviour” one “offers”.

Now we seem to have the same old story of “exploit the other person’s decency (civilized behavior), and then claim a (Darwinian) victory.”

This is what the muslims want to do to the non-muslims. In SA, Blacks want to do the same to Whites. And all over the world the “uncivilized incompetent” want to do to the “competent civilized”.

“the white male has been ‘dethroned’ and should now learn to adapt to a subservient, even submissive, role within our society.”

Sounds like he has already adopted the Islamic attitude to the dhimmi. [Imagine if a white man said this–and under the guise of scholarship, no less!]