Monthly Archives: March 2010

Republicans Just Jealous

Democrats, Elections, Healthcare, Political Economy, Regulation, Republicans

I’m always appalled by individuals, even on this site, who keep faith with the two-party system—and especially, the Republican Party—which, they insist, can be reformed. They’ve been watching the worms wriggle longer than I; but from where I’m perched, it is plain that had Republicans not made such a nuisance of themselves for so long, they’d be standing where BO is standing, heralding the near completion of the work of FDR.

That ObamaCare is awfully similar to (Mitt) RomneyCare is also plain to policy wonks who’re in the know. David Frum is an example. Admonishing the GOP for losing it by ostensibly tacking right—engaging in “overheated talk” and refusing “to deal”—David Frum points out that,

The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.

The FrumForum has more on the statist points of intersection between Romney- and ObamaCare:

Romneycare … did not create a federal bureaucracy; it created a state bureaucracy. It did not raise taxes; but instead was based on $300 million in free federal money. But in the main outlines, the two programs are identical.

My colleague Vox Day writes the following:

“…it is completely shameless for Republicans to complain that nationalizing health care is an unconstitutional expansion of federal power.”

“It wasn’t all that long ago that Republicans held the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. With the exception of an 18-month senatorial interregnum from May 2001 to November 2002, the Republican Party held unilateral control of all three branches of the federal government for six years. And what did it do with it?”

“Republicans wasted their electoral popularity on two unnecessary and unpopular military occupations. They foolishly transformed what had briefly been a bipartisan budget surplus into what were then thought to be nearly unprecedented deficits. They stupidly created a new federal entitlement program that has turned out to cost far more than was originally estimated. And, to top it all off, they arrogantly ignored the clearly expressed wishes of the American public and handed over $700 billion to a collection of corrupt and insolvent bankers.”

Lessons From Big Daddy O & His Right-Hand Ho

Barack Obama, Constitution, Democrats, Economy, Healthcare, IMMIGRATION, Regulation, Republicans, Welfare

HERE’S WHAT I TOOK away from the weekend long Pelosi Palooza and Obama health-care orgy:

With one flick of a pen, a politician is able to render finite resources infinite; that in the hands of millions of new affirmatively appointed state hires, private property—approximately $409.2 billion, confiscated from rightful, productive owners— will be funneled into so-called state-of-the-art health care. Basically turned into gold. That bilking “$69 billion more in penalties for individuals and businesses who don’t meet mandates to buy insurance” will generate plenty and prosperity like nothing else, just as The Founders envisaged.

Most of the revenue would come from higher Medicare taxes on about 1 million individuals earning more than $200,000 and about 4 million couples filing jointly who make more than $250,000

What assorted idiots and moochers-in-the making took away from this legislative theft is that it is constitutional to single out a distinct segment of society—the productive—for punishment. The only consideration that counts is, “How many Americans want it?” Gimme, gimme, gimme is the new national anthem.

“The man with the Reverse Midas Touch,” Big Daddy O, and his right hand Ho, have taught the nation so many lesson, not least that attainder laws are now constitutional (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10), and that “our high-minded messiah has the authority to punish an (innocent) group of people—more or less 5 million Americans who’ll shoulder the hulking H.R.4872 Reconciliation Act of 2010“without the benefit of due process.”

Scrap that; no moocher knows what attainder laws are.

And if you don’t yet know that the Republicans are your fair-weather friends who’ll sign their own mammoth bills when they occupy the same seats in the game of political musical chairs they play exclusively with the Dems—then listen to stupid Michael Steel condemn freedom-loving demonstrators for their righteous ire and promise statists like Geraldo Rivera and Sheppard Smith of FoxNews that a welcoming immigration bill is next.

************
Here’s a good precis of H.R.4872 Reconciliation Act of 2010, courtesy of the WSJ:

The $940 billion health-care overhaul will take nearly a decade to roll out in full. A look at the key parts of the bill and when they go into effect.
2010

Coverage

* Subsidies begin for small businesses to provide coverage to employees.
* Insurance companies barred from denying coverage to children with pre-existing illness.
* Children permitted to stay on their parents’ insurance policies until their 26th birthday.

2011

Coverage

* Set up long-term care program under which people pay premiums into system for at least five years and become eligible for support payments if they need assistance in daily living.

Taxes and fees

* Drug makers face annual fee of $2.5 billion (rises in subsequent years).

2013

Taxes and fees

* New Medicare taxes on individuals earning more than $200,000 a year and couples filing jointly earning more than $250,000 a year.
* Tax on wages rises to 2.35% from 1.45%.
* New 3.8% tax on unearned income such as dividends and interest.
* Excise tax of 2.3% imposed on sale of medical devices.

Cost control

* Medicare pilot program begins to test bundled payments for care, in a bid to pay for quality rather than quantity of services.

2014

Coverage

* Create exchanges where people without employer coverage, as well as small businesses, can shop for health coverage. Insurance companies barred from denying coverage to anyone with pre-existing illness.
* Requirement begins for most people to have health insurance. Subsidies begin for lower and middle-income people. People at 133% of federal poverty level pay maximum of 3% of income for coverage. People at 400% of poverty level pay up to 9.5% of income. (Poverty level currently is about $22,000 for a family of four.)
* Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor, expands to all Americans with income up to 133% of federal poverty level.
* Subsidies for small businesses to provide coverage increase. Businesses with 10 or fewer employees and average annual wages of less than $25,000 receive tax credit of up to 50% of employer’s contribution. Tax credits phase out for larger businesses.

Taxes and fees

* Employers with more than 50 employees that don’t provide affordable coverage must pay a fine if employees receive tax credits to buy insurance. Fine is up to $3,000 per employee, excluding first 30 employees.
* Insurance industry must pay annual fee of $8 billion (rises in subsequent years).

Cost control

* Independent Medicare board must begin to submit recommendations to curb Medicare spending, if costs are rising faster than inflation.

2016

Taxes and fees

* Penalty for those who don’t carry coverage rises to 2.5% of taxable income or $695, whichever is greater.

2017

Coverage

* Businesses with more than 100 employees can buy coverage on insurance exchanges, if state permits it.

2018

Taxes and fees

* Excise tax of 40% imposed on health plans valued at more than $10,200 for individual coverage and $27,500 for family coverage.

—Sources: House bill; Kaiser Family Foundation

Corrections & Amplifications
The House health legislation imposes a 2.3% excise tax on the sale of medical devices. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said the tax was 2.9%, the figure before a last-minute change to the legislation.

Updated: The Abortion Distraction (Bill Passed, Pelosi Palooza In Process)

Constitution, Democrats, Federalism, Healthcare, Individual Rights, Liberty, Regulation, States' Rights

The abortion fetish is just one of the distractions that damages the cause of freedom in the attempt to halt the hulking H.R.4872 Reconciliation Act of 2010.

FoxNews: “Pro-life Democrats have reached a deal with President Obama to ensure that no taxpayer money goes to abortion services, Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., who led Democratic lawmakers opposed to the Senate bill, said Sunday.”

Stupak made the announcement surrounded by a handful of Democratic lawmakers who had held out their “yes” votes on a massive health insurance overhaul set for a vote on Sunday over abortion. The swing appeared to give Democratic leaders enough votes to pass the 10-year, nearly $1 trillion legislation.

Only the brainless quibble about the correct constitutional position: abortion is to be regulated by states and individuals, not federales.

But conservadems and their Republican pals have managed to muddy the voice of freedom with their constant pules for fetuses (not their own), instead of standing on a refusal to raid coffers not theirs. Abortion is a side-issue, a mere distraction in the fight against the further bureaucratization of health care.

The Ann Coulter cohort continually instruct tea party goers to get behind this or the other Republican if he or she is for “prayer in schools, against abortion and gay marriage.”

Polls confirm what you and I know: freedom-minded individuals don’t give a tinker’s toss about these conservative fetishes.

Conservadems and damn Republicans still don’t get what the opposition to this Bill—and the Tea Party groundswell—is all about.

Incidentally, Bachmann is everything Palin is not.

Update (March 21): PELOSI PALOOZA. Pelosi says that a welfare program resembling Social Security and Medicare in size and significance further brings american society closer to the values espoused by the Founding Fathers and framers of the Constitution.
Not even historians to the regime will deny that the likes of John Locke (b. 1632, d. 1704), with his natural rights doctrine, were the inspiration for the American Founders. That bitch is such a colossal ignoramus.

The vote is in process. It has passed: 219 yeas to 212 nays.

Updated: “‘Deem and Pass’ Dead” (Pass Impending)

Democrats, Healthcare, Law, Liberty, Regulation, The State

“‘Deem and Pass’ is dead” reports FoxNews. This means that the Democrats will have to put their faces not only to “the ostensibly redeemable aspects of the bill—namely the amendments—in hope of hanging onto their jobs,” but to the complete hulking thing. It also means that the Democrats are confident they have the requisite 216 roach votes to pass what is an enormous expansion of government and debt. A sad development for the republic, RIP.

Meanwhile, tea party patriots make a last stand, egged on by the indomitable, much-maligned Michele Bachmann.

Update (March 21): PASS IMPENDING. “‘We have the votes now,’ Representative John Larson, head of the House Democratic Caucus, said on ABC’s ‘This Week,’ although other House leaders were more cautious in their assessment.”

“House Democratic leader Steny Hoyer told NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ the number of votes still needed for passage were in the “low single digits.'”

[SNIP]
The English language makes an appearance, in the main Bill, at “SUBDIVISION A,” SEC. 100. The Amendments are an affront; they are written in the legalese reserved for the Managerial State; evolved over time to ensure the people have not the faintest notion what’s upon them.

Here is an entirely representative excerpt from the Amendments portion of the Bill:

PREMIUM TAX CREDITS.—Section 36B of the In6
ternal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1401
7 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
8 amended by section 10105 of such Act, is amended—
9 (1) in subsection (b)(3)(A)—
10 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘with respect
11 to any taxpayer’’ and all that follows up to the
12 end period and inserting ‘‘for any taxable year
13 shall be the percentage such that the applicable
14 percentage for any taxpayer whose household
15 income is within an income tier specified in the
16 following table shall increase, on a sliding scale
17 in a linear manner, from the initial premium
18 percentage to the final premium percentage
19 specified in such table for such income tier: ….

[SNIP]

What in bloody blue blazes is this? It’s an affront; an “eff you, little serf” if ever there was one.