Category Archives: Environmentalism & Animal Rights

Updated Again: Animals Gone Wild

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Pseudoscience

“While Western man works to rid himself of the most basic ethical instincts, like defending his kinfolk, animals remain true to their nature. Wild beasts intuit that their teeth and talons are meant for tearing flesh–any flesh, the easier the better. It makes perfect animal sense to attack a thing that is docile, slow, and passive, like the not-so sapient Homo sapiens…

The handful of honest experts left admits that attacks are up because politically correct policies have bred fearless critters. The Pavlovian response to aversive treatment has been bred out of the wild animal population. Mary Zeiss Stange, author of Woman the Hunter, says that hunting ultimately has less to do with killing than with instilling fear in animals that have placed us on their menu. If animal rights activists possessed a dog’s smarts, they’d understand the perils of such a program, for an unafraid animal is a dangerous animal; an unafraid human an endangered fool…”

Read the rest of my new column, “Animals Gone Wild,” on The American Spectator. Comments are, as always, welcome.

Update: There are some very amusing and poignant letters-to-the-editor on The American Spectator about “Animals Gone Wild.” The section is titled “Wolves and Alligators,” and everyone is pretty pissed off.

I like R. Trotter’s missive: “A big paws up to Ilana Mercer’s fine article. Watch just about any nature documentary and much of it is dedicated to telling us simpletons that though many of us are afraid of snakes, sharks, bears, etc., in reality humans pose a greater threat to the critters than they do to us. While that is, at best, arguable, and only so on a statistical and species-by-species basis, it is based upon the flawed premise that the life of a human and, say, a black widow spider, are equivalent…”

Sam Karnick has an interesting comment at Karnick On Culture. Here’s my reply.

Updated Again: Animals Gone Wild has really struck a chord. Writing for the British Spiked Online, Josie Appleton has referenced my essay. As I told her, it’s refreshing to meet a writer who is both professional and ethical as to reference a quote. I do it, but most here don’t:

Hi,
A friend sent your piece on wild animals to me as I was just about to publish a piece on the same subject (hooked off the wild boar rampage in Germany), so I included a couple of your examples. Thanks for a good article.
‘BEWARE OF THE BOARS: From Bavaria to South Africa, rampaging animals are bringing towns to a standstill. Why don’t we just shoot them?’
All the best
Josie Appleton
Convenor, Manifesto Club ((www.manifestoclub.com)

Cheney’s Pickle/Katrina Commission’s Redundancy

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Film, Media

The press grilled White House Spokesman Scott McClellan over the delay in reporting the Vice President’s shooting accident. Aren’t we fortunate these intrepid men and women never lose sight of what’s important? Invading Iraq? “Misspeaking” about WMD? Dissing the Danes? Deficit spending? Get out of here! Dick Cheney’s embarrassment over spraying a pal with birdshot—now that’s a scoop. I will say this: it is clear Cheney is a hazard to his friends as well.

“US government ‘failed’ on Katrina” screeched the headlines. And we needed a commission and a 600-page document to tell us this? The reporters who covered the Katrina calamity rather well for a change are telling us, with a straight face, what was apparently inconclusive. Oh, come off it! What they should be doing is screening the best satire ever written about the state: “Yes, Minister” and “Yes, Prime Minister.” There, the delicious Sir Humphrey explains what a commission of inquiry aims to achieve. Since I can’t find the direct quote, here is a summation by someone who knows his satire:

The main function of any commission is to delay decision-making until the people, in their infinite wisdom, have moved on to the next Shane Warne/Schapelle Corby/Big Brother eviction. Then, by the time the commission hands down its findings, the people have forgotten the original issue and the politicians can safely put the report in a cupboard and get on with” other abuses.

Cancel cable; Get the series.

Cheney's Pickle/Katrina Commission's Redundancy

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Film, Media

The press grilled White House Spokesman Scott McClellan over the delay in reporting the Vice President’s shooting accident. Aren’t we fortunate these intrepid men and women never lose sight of what’s important? Invading Iraq? “Misspeaking” about WMD? Dissing the Danes? Deficit spending? Get out of here! Dick Cheney’s embarrassment over spraying a pal with birdshot—now that’s a scoop. I will say this: it is clear Cheney is a hazard to his friends as well.

“US government ‘failed’ on Katrina” screeched the headlines. And we needed a commission and a 600-page document to tell us this? The reporters who covered the Katrina calamity rather well for a change are telling us, with a straight face, what was apparently inconclusive. Oh, come off it! What they should be doing is screening the best satire ever written about the state: “Yes, Minister” and “Yes, Prime Minister.” There, the delicious Sir Humphrey explains what a commission of inquiry aims to achieve. Since I can’t find the direct quote, here is a summation by someone who knows his satire:

The main function of any commission is to delay decision-making until the people, in their infinite wisdom, have moved on to the next Shane Warne/Schapelle Corby/Big Brother eviction. Then, by the time the commission hands down its findings, the people have forgotten the original issue and the politicians can safely put the report in a cupboard and get on with” other abuses.

Cancel cable; Get the series.

Shark Tale

Environmentalism & Animal Rights

Fantasy though it is, Steven Spielberg’s magnificent thriller, Jaws, is still a better Guide For The Perplexed on shark behavior than the “experts.” Using anthropomorphism (the practice of attributing human characteristics to an animal), not reason, the shark seers insist that this perfectly designed killing machine prefers feasting on fish than on folks. (“Too tough and chewy,” says a spokesfish for the shark community. “The attacks in the Florida Panhandle were carried out by two rogue members of our society.”) Let’s see: isn’t the alleged feeding preference of sharks a consequence of there being more fish in the sea than people? Hmm… And so we hear that the two teens who were recently savaged were either mistaken for seals or were perceived by Jaws to be jostling for his food supply. (“This is a turf war,” said the spokesfish, otherwise known as “The Mouth.”) A witness —a brave surfer who paddled to the rescue —says Sharky didn’t seem remotely ambivalent, and was doing what powerful, flesh-eating animals with pointy teeth do: tucking in.
“Different species; different cultures,” philosophized MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough. That neoconservatives adopt the language of equivalence vis-a -vis man’s relationship with a man eater isn’t surprising. They have embraced many pink perversions (Andrew Sullivan does proud to Greenpeace and the Sierra Club). “Why do you think the Bush administration has such a blind spot on the environment?” Scarborough whinged at actor Robert Redford, who proceeded (with permission) to slime the president for taking pleasure in “shredding” nature. Bill O’Reilly and Joe Scarborough pounce on anyone who repudiates the invasion of Iraq for the moral, legal, and constitutional corruption that it is. But they openly allow liberals to slam Bush on the one issue he’s not that bad on: the environment (for one, his refusal to capitulate to the Kyoto-protocol crazies showed good judgment). Go figure.