Category Archives: Environmentalism & Animal Rights

Updated Again: A Storm in a Tea Cup, Apparently

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Media, The Zeitgeist

The first thing to note in the aftermath of the biggest windstorm to hit Washington and Oregon in decades is the lack of coverage in MSM. The feminized media allots plenty of coverage to human interest stories–the girls are currently eulogizing endlessly the “experienced” mountaineers gone up Mount Hood during the most treacherous month of the year, just before one of the biggest blizzards ever. (Hey, do a story about electricity deprived, peeved pets or something.) But nothing about at least a million residents in the Pacific Northwest stranded without power for days, in primitive conditions, befitting a Third World country–or perhaps states overrun by greens, where the Prius is the “People’s Car.”

Well, as I say, we were plunged into a primitive, Third-World existence. Temperatures in my home plummeted to 45 degrees for 4 days. We coped thanks to the generosity of a neighbor with a massive generator. Now that I know I live at the mercy of Luddites, I fully intend to go survivalist: a generator, extra gas for the BBQ (I made a stew with the remaining chicken in my freezer, although I was forced to discard the rest of the meat and fish therein), and piles of candles.

So what are the questions Journalism of Old would have asked here? Utilities are only nominally private and are heavily regulated. How have regulations affected their response times and, most crucially, the maintenance of the power grid? Should power lines be buried? Why aren’t they? (Earthquakes would be one consideration, in addition to costs.)

But above all: the grid and power lines suffered mostly tree damage. In this part of the world, the trees everywhere are intertwined with the cable. Why? Why isn’t a wide tree-free swath maintained around these vital structures? Why are trees not chopped back?

I suspect the explanation lies in the self-defeating dementia of tree fetishists, and “Watermelon” legislation — green on the outside; red on the inside. However, as usual, the “Watermelon” worldview creates more havoc than it prevents. Because of wood fires, the usually pristine air in our part of the world resembles the air above the shanty town of Soweto. The resources and energy spent–and the lives lost–because of this mess are many times the cost or worth of a few thousand trees.

Update: While MSNBC noodles on for hours about the “experienced” climbers of Mt. Hood, and their relatives who, like all Americans, have an amazing knack for suctioning themselves to TV cameras and addressing “the nation” in their time of sorrow, some residents of King County, WA, got told they may be without power for yet another two weeks.

Updated Again: S. Johnson of Oregon backs up what I’ve surmised so far. He writes: Thank you for telling it like it is. We are on a private, co-operative power co. (Blachly-Lane), and they do exactly what you suggested be done as far as maintaining a tree-free zone around power lines. The Greens/tree huggers/libs thwart their efforts to a degree, as do liberal property owners, so guess what? The trouble we do experience is ALWAYS on/around their property! “They” never get it. I have a neighbor that refuses to let the power co. install a pole on his property because he maintains that it isn’t necessary as it’s been that way for 40 years and he is not going to change his mind. Guess what again? The power outages caused by winds are ALWAYS because the power lines span such a long distance over his property that they whip severely and bring down the poles! EVERY TIME! Yes, during the storm, down came the power pole and we, and about 500 others, were out of power for 23 hrs. Not a big deal for us, as I have generators, but some others don’t. I’ve lived here for 31 years (it’s a very rural area) and our power co. only serves about 2500 customers. I have talked to the “neighbor.” He is a Berkley educated hobby farmer who is as stuck on himself as he is dense. I’m sure he can absorb light. Won’t budge even when the facts are overwhelmingly against him. Oh, well, I won’t bore you anymore. Thanks for letting me vent. Keep up the good work and MERRY CHRISTMAS to you.

Updated Again: Animals Gone Wild

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Pseudoscience

“While Western man works to rid himself of the most basic ethical instincts, like defending his kinfolk, animals remain true to their nature. Wild beasts intuit that their teeth and talons are meant for tearing flesh–any flesh, the easier the better. It makes perfect animal sense to attack a thing that is docile, slow, and passive, like the not-so sapient Homo sapiens…

The handful of honest experts left admits that attacks are up because politically correct policies have bred fearless critters. The Pavlovian response to aversive treatment has been bred out of the wild animal population. Mary Zeiss Stange, author of Woman the Hunter, says that hunting ultimately has less to do with killing than with instilling fear in animals that have placed us on their menu. If animal rights activists possessed a dog’s smarts, they’d understand the perils of such a program, for an unafraid animal is a dangerous animal; an unafraid human an endangered fool…”

Read the rest of my new column, “Animals Gone Wild,” on The American Spectator. Comments are, as always, welcome.

Update: There are some very amusing and poignant letters-to-the-editor on The American Spectator about “Animals Gone Wild.” The section is titled “Wolves and Alligators,” and everyone is pretty pissed off.

I like R. Trotter’s missive: “A big paws up to Ilana Mercer’s fine article. Watch just about any nature documentary and much of it is dedicated to telling us simpletons that though many of us are afraid of snakes, sharks, bears, etc., in reality humans pose a greater threat to the critters than they do to us. While that is, at best, arguable, and only so on a statistical and species-by-species basis, it is based upon the flawed premise that the life of a human and, say, a black widow spider, are equivalent…”

Sam Karnick has an interesting comment at Karnick On Culture. Here’s my reply.

Updated Again: Animals Gone Wild has really struck a chord. Writing for the British Spiked Online, Josie Appleton has referenced my essay. As I told her, it’s refreshing to meet a writer who is both professional and ethical as to reference a quote. I do it, but most here don’t:

Hi,
A friend sent your piece on wild animals to me as I was just about to publish a piece on the same subject (hooked off the wild boar rampage in Germany), so I included a couple of your examples. Thanks for a good article.
‘BEWARE OF THE BOARS: From Bavaria to South Africa, rampaging animals are bringing towns to a standstill. Why don’t we just shoot them?’
All the best
Josie Appleton
Convenor, Manifesto Club ((www.manifestoclub.com)

Cheney’s Pickle/Katrina Commission’s Redundancy

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Film, Media

The press grilled White House Spokesman Scott McClellan over the delay in reporting the Vice President’s shooting accident. Aren’t we fortunate these intrepid men and women never lose sight of what’s important? Invading Iraq? “Misspeaking” about WMD? Dissing the Danes? Deficit spending? Get out of here! Dick Cheney’s embarrassment over spraying a pal with birdshot—now that’s a scoop. I will say this: it is clear Cheney is a hazard to his friends as well.

“US government ‘failed’ on Katrina” screeched the headlines. And we needed a commission and a 600-page document to tell us this? The reporters who covered the Katrina calamity rather well for a change are telling us, with a straight face, what was apparently inconclusive. Oh, come off it! What they should be doing is screening the best satire ever written about the state: “Yes, Minister” and “Yes, Prime Minister.” There, the delicious Sir Humphrey explains what a commission of inquiry aims to achieve. Since I can’t find the direct quote, here is a summation by someone who knows his satire:

The main function of any commission is to delay decision-making until the people, in their infinite wisdom, have moved on to the next Shane Warne/Schapelle Corby/Big Brother eviction. Then, by the time the commission hands down its findings, the people have forgotten the original issue and the politicians can safely put the report in a cupboard and get on with” other abuses.

Cancel cable; Get the series.

Cheney's Pickle/Katrina Commission's Redundancy

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Film, Media

The press grilled White House Spokesman Scott McClellan over the delay in reporting the Vice President’s shooting accident. Aren’t we fortunate these intrepid men and women never lose sight of what’s important? Invading Iraq? “Misspeaking” about WMD? Dissing the Danes? Deficit spending? Get out of here! Dick Cheney’s embarrassment over spraying a pal with birdshot—now that’s a scoop. I will say this: it is clear Cheney is a hazard to his friends as well.

“US government ‘failed’ on Katrina” screeched the headlines. And we needed a commission and a 600-page document to tell us this? The reporters who covered the Katrina calamity rather well for a change are telling us, with a straight face, what was apparently inconclusive. Oh, come off it! What they should be doing is screening the best satire ever written about the state: “Yes, Minister” and “Yes, Prime Minister.” There, the delicious Sir Humphrey explains what a commission of inquiry aims to achieve. Since I can’t find the direct quote, here is a summation by someone who knows his satire:

The main function of any commission is to delay decision-making until the people, in their infinite wisdom, have moved on to the next Shane Warne/Schapelle Corby/Big Brother eviction. Then, by the time the commission hands down its findings, the people have forgotten the original issue and the politicians can safely put the report in a cupboard and get on with” other abuses.

Cancel cable; Get the series.