King Cuts Coulter Down

Ann Coulter,Homosexuality,Media,The Zeitgeist

            

Florence King leaves most pipsqueak contemporary “writers” standing (they’re syndicated, however, she’s not). The famous misanthrope and recluse saw fit to emerge from hibernation to kick Ann coulter around in a column for National Review. Some other conservatives crawled from under dank rocks and attempted to respond to King’s studied contempt. Here’s a taste of why they failed so miserably:

Coulter’s sexual remarks are at once grim and flippant. Commenting on a psychologist’s plan to teach children about gay sex in a loving way, she said: ‘How can you teach children about anal sex in a loving way? Or any sodomy, for that matter?”
I am not saying that everyone has to be witty and original and overflowing with dazzling bons mots — after all, Coulter is a lawyer and I wouldn’t want to see her let down the side. I am just curious to know why she was content to call Katie Couric “the affable Eva Braun of morning TV.” Couldn’t she come up with something better? How about Simper Fidelis?…
At her best, Coulter writes well, but the chief source of her success is that she is a perfect match for the American ideal: smart as a whip but dumb as a post, educated but not learned, sexy but not sensuous, all at the same time. She would not hesitate to choose a sledgehammer over a stiletto because her instincts would pull her back from what the 18th century called ‘demolishing your enemies without raising your voice.’ She would know that if a writer uses a stiletto, a lot of people might not get the point, but they would definitely get the loftiness that accompanies irony and understatement. And so, knowing that being called an elitist spells ruin, she opted for a sledgehammer and raised the roof instead.
Her timing was perfect, putting her before the television cameras just in time to take advantage of the whoosh. That’s the sound cable news uses to signal each new 15-second segment in a roundup. They report the latest border debacle, then they go whoosh! and start talking about midwestern floods. When they finish the floods there’s another whoosh! and the subject changes to the stock market. Gone are the days when a break was signaled by a soft rattle of the host’s fake papers and a murmured ‘We’ll be back in a moment.’ Now, if a revered philosopher came on a show, the host would say, ‘Hold your thought, Plato,’ and cut to whoosh.
CNN has the loudest whoosh, a harsh wheezing sound so labored that at first I thought it was me. After all, I made my NR debut 16 years ago with a cover story called ‘I’d Rather Smoke Than Kiss.’ But no. The whoosh is television’s way of telling us that we are being swept up and borne aloft on gusty torrents of swirling excitement. To train us to gasp, they walk us through it by gasping for us.
The whoosh needs a blowhard and it has gotten Ann Coulter, a one-woman Hyde Park Corner who, love her or hate her, is saving television from itself by never uttering Guestisms — those gummy little nothings that guests keep saying over and over without thinking until everybody thinks they have said something thoughtful.”

King’s complete column, “Watch Ann Go Whoosh!,” is here. And here is my “Coughing Up Some Coulter Fur Balls.”

4 thoughts on “King Cuts Coulter Down

  1. Sarpi

    I have no idea what she’s saying, other than she doesn’t like Coulter’s style (didn’t see her criticize the substance) and Americans [American? Are you sure you read the essay?] are mostly, “smart as a whip but dumb as a post”. I feel the contempt, but don’t get the point. It’s irritating when the boring try to convince me of their sly subtlety.

  2. james huggins

    Ann Coulter is great. Most readers/voters aren’t degreed intellectuals. The clever stiletto is lost on many but the sledge hammer gets the point across to all. Why are we always so worried about hurting the feelings of the left? They sure don’t worry about hurting ours. Coulter’s crude approach might turn off the average PHD but there aren’t too many PHDs out there and most of them are leftists anyway. If the hair-splitting academics would stop fretting about Coulters style and spend their time getting after the enemy they might become as effective as she is.

  3. graham strouse

    Translation:

    Coulter is a player. She’s clever, but she’s still just a player. It’s not hard to imagine her selling primo Florida real estate or a bridge in Brooklyn.

    Hey, Coulter is a good writer. She is astute. But every move she makes is calculated to advance herself & not in a way likely to advance the lives of the people who buy her books. Quite the contrary.

    Coulter’s a combination of Michael Eisner and Leni Reifenstahl. Maybe she’s an agent of the Dark Lord of the Sith. Maybe she’s an agent of Darwin. Thing is, the people who buy her line, buy her bridge, buy her swampy real estate, they ain’t the ones who end up living with it.

    Reap the whirlwind, Annie. Reap the whirlwind.

  4. james huggins

    Coulter may be a player but she’s my kind of player. Along the way she confounds the ones who need to be confounded. More power to her.

Comments are closed.