printThe excerpt is from my new WorldNetDaily.com column, “Obama’s & Abdullah’s Plans for Israel:
“Barack Obama has decided to revive a plot the Saudi Crown Prince hatched in 2002. Abdullah bin Abdulaziz had suggested Israel beat a retreat to the pre-1967 borders, in return for the recognition, whatever that means, of the Arab world.” …
“For its concessions, the Arab League will doff a collective kafia to Israel. As will Israel be given ‘an effective veto’ on the national suicide pact known as the right of return—the imperative to absorb millions of self-styled Palestinian ‘refugees’ into Israel proper. …”
“There is nothing Solomonic about splitting up Jerusalem, which was sacred to Jews for nearly two thousand years before Muhammad, and is not once mentioned in the Koran.
Did Gaza not set a sufficiently strong precedent against such folly? It was “returned” to the Palestinians, who promptly destroyed the hothouses Israelis had built there, and planted Qassam rocket launchers in the ground instead. Gaza now hothouses Hamasniks.”
“(On the general wisdom of handing over territory—any territory—to voracious, vicious majorities, consider South Africa and its capital, Pretoria. Renamed Tshwane, Pretoria is now occupied by Saint Nelson Mandela’s syndicate, the African National Congress. The difference is that more people worry about the Holy City going to hell in a hand cart than care about the decay of Pretoria.)”
Read the complete column, “Obama’s & Abdullah’s Plans for Israel,” on WorldNetDaily.com.
Update: The Sunday Times is a British newspaper. The item about Obama agitating for Israel’s return to the 1967 borders originated in the Times. Has this been reported in the US press? Recall, the first time we learned about George Hussein Onyango Obama, the president elect’s half-starving, half-brother, was from the British press. Is this the case with resepct to Obama’s direction with Israel? If the American press intends to abrogate its responsibility to report about this man, much as the same media neglected to report the truth about the invasion of Iraq—scouring the foreign news media will become a must.
On the topic of minimizing iffy news about the media’s Messiah; did you know Malia and what’shername—Obama’s other precious progeny—will be attending a private school at the cost of 30 grand a pop, per year. “Mayor Adrian M. Fenty of Washington strongly lobbied the Obamas to consider a public school, but that was apparently never an option,” reports the NYT. A man of the people is our Prince. What’s good for average Joe’s goose is clearly no good for Obama’s gander.
When Jordan controlled the so-called “west bank” prior to 1967 and Egypt controlled the Gaza strip, there were no calls for a “palestinian” state. It was only after Israel captured the land during a war that was started by the arabs, that the arab nations started yammering for a “palestinian state”. Actually, it really hasn’t changed, it is the destruction of the Nation of Israel, that arabs want, not at “state of palestine”
This is the same old stuff, Ilana. Why don’t you come down to the Thursday night Elders of Zion meeting at Abe’s Delicatessen (seating for 80,000) and we’ll discuss it over a nice Bloody Moishe. The corned beef is lean and the pastrami is to DIE from!
Memo to Erudites:
Ahhh Ilana! Always alliteratively alluring!!
“…hothouses Hamasniks”
HA!
(and re: the remainder of the brilliant blah blah blah… true, true, and double-true!)
My husband and I just moved back to the US after living 13 years in Saudi Arabia. We believe that King Abdullah is a well-respected leader in the Middle East and one who can influence other leaders. We are glad that President Elect Obama is in support of King Abdullah’s Peace Plan and feel this should be further pursued. Perhaps the timing is right now. God knows we need peace there. Negativity never solves anything. You will find that Barack Obama approaches problems in a hopeful way and moves forward in a much more positive way. You will see changes in the way his administration functions for what we have had in the past and anything that he is involved in with be done with much energy and determination. King Abdullah is a sincere leader who truly wishes to move forward with a solution to peace in the Middle East. We need to all be supportive of these positive attempts, not negative.
This is a subject that tripped my radar screen yesterday before reading ILana’s article. Naturally I needed to read her article. What I noticed yesterday when I read the article on the 1967 border statement from Obama, was that here he is, not even the President of the USA yet, and here he is talking about Israel making absurd concessions to terrorists. Wow! This bothers me greatly. Obama can claim he is a Christian, a black liberation theologian, or what ever he want’s to say. However, the fact remains that a leopard cannot change his spots. Likewise, Obama, that is Hussein Obama, has let his true colors overwhelm his deceptive mind. By this unthinkable statement, he validates what many of us already knew about him. Martin Berrow
I am in agreement with Steve’s comments; “the Arabs are only bent on Israel’s destruction.” Why have so many voted for Obama, who by the way is also of Arab descend (reference his middle name “Hussein”). I don’t believe he has Israel’s best interests at heart. I don’t trust him ( and neither should Gail), particularly in light of his aids having met with Hamas prior to the election.