Updated: A-Jad

Iran,Islam,Israel

            

Only in America. And I mean it in a good way. I first came across this nickname for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at Diana West’s blog. I see it’s commonly used by The American Thinker. Very funny. I know I’ll be scolded by neocons, who describe A-Jad as akin to Hitler, but all I see is a colossal clown.

In any case, a nickname is long overdue. Good wholesome disrespect is the best assertion of American superiority.

On a serious note, Andy Bostom, the exegete of Islam, has some must-read Iran analysis on his blog. Read “Perpetuating Iran’s Islamic Culture of Hate,” and “Mullah’s Milk.”

Update (June 23): A-JAD AND ISRAEL. The Christian Science Monitor considers the reasons A-Jad is preferred in Israel:

“[E]ven though Mr. Ahmadinejad has threatened the Jewish state with destruction, many officials and analysts [there] actually prefer the incumbent president because – short of the downfall of Iran’s theocratic system of government – he’ll be easier to isolate. Reformist leader Mr. Mousavi, by contrast, isn’t expected to alter Iran’s drive for nuclear power, but he would win international sympathy.”…

6 thoughts on “Updated: A-Jad

  1. Robert Glisson

    I can’t seem to get through on “Mullah’s Milk” but ‘P.I.C. of hate’ is a well written example of almost all Muslim “evangelism.” I knew a Christian in the Philippines a few years ago. He stated that the Atheists and Christians in his home country always could work out their differences and meet the needs in their villages; however, the Muslims there continuously work to destroy the harmony within the villages. Pakistan uses the same tactics as Iran, only against the Hindu’s on the border between themselves and India, slowly eroding the Hindu presence in the disputed territory by destroying Hindus and their temples in small dramatic raids and replacing them with their own people. It’s more than just sad that a religious belief can be so detrimental.

  2. Virgil

    The second link, “Mullah’s Milk” is not working. [Thanks; fixed.]

  3. M. B. Moon

    I have contempt for belief systems that rely on compulsion. Muslims should hang their heads in shame that their beliefs require FORCE to survive. Pitiful!

  4. Steven

    The sad fact of the matter is that there is no difference between Ahmadinazi and Moussavi. I feel no sympathy for those who want to “reform” the Islamic regime. My sympathy is only for those who want to DESTROY the Islamic regime. The best thing that the Persians can do is to revert back to the religion of Ahura Mazda and turn their backs on Arab allah and Muhammad.

    AHURA MAZDA AKBAR!

  5. Stephen Hayes

    I wonder what I ought to think of all this hubbub in Iran. I wonder why America has to take sides. I wonder, too, what the people in the streets there are thinking, what is motivating them? Is it good to have chaos there? Do the lunatics running that country have a right to keep order? Or have they kept too much order and need to be run out of town? Better the lunatic we know than the one we don’t know? All I am sure of is that I had a roomy in college in 1970 from Tehran. I liked him, and he was a sane kid so far as I could tell. Life was not terrible at home, he said. The Shah was a sane man, too, mostly. It’s too bad America is to blame for all this by electing our own lunatic, Jimmy “the geek” Carter. He screwed over the only ally we had in central Asia, and look what we have now. Another fine mess we ought to stay out of, but we just can’t resist it. Stop that, or Obama spank! Yeah, that’ll work.

Comments are closed.