Category Archives: Debt

BREAKING: China Cancels US Credit Card

China, Debt, Economy, Federal Reserve Bank, Inflation, Republicans

We’ve been saying this on BAB for quite sometime: China has been a good sport about bearing the brunt of the American debt. Now a Republican admits the same:

“Representative Mark Kirk, a member of the House Appropriations Committee and co-chair of a group of lawmakers promoting relations with Beijing, said China had ‘very legitimate’ concerns about its investments.”

“‘It would appear, quietly and with deference and politeness, that China has canceled America’s credit card,’ Kirk told the Committee of 100, a Chinese-American group.” By which he meant that “investors in China have sharply curtailed their purchases of bonds.” [My emphasis]

“The Republican lawmaker said that China was justified in concerns about returns from finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were bailed out by the US government due to the financial crisis.”

Yes, it takes a change of fortunes for Republicans to quit dissing the patient Asians for their democratic deficits, and begin to be thankful that they’ve continued to finance America’s non-stop spending and consumption.

I suspect that were Bush at the helm, republicans would be cussing and carrying on in their usual sinophobic manner.

The patient Asians took what we dished–the dissing, the spending, and the exported inflation.

No more.

Updated: The Guy Really Doesn't Get Econ 101

Barack Obama, Business, Debt, Democrats, Government

State-enforced egalitarianism in borrowing and lending has been a key component in the economic meltdown. But Barry the Bolshevik is intent on preventing any market corrections from taking place.

Financial institutions are attempting to reverse lending socialism. That means charging clients commensurate with the risk they pose to their lenders. Or not lending to the risky. Increases in late fees and in interest rates on existing balances, as well as requiring greater disclosure—these are all necessary, and to be expected, if a correction is to occur, one that incentivizes savings and solvency.

But not if Obama can help it. At Obama’s behest,

Both the House and Senate are considering a credit card “bill of rights” to limit the ability of credit-card companies to raise interest rates on existing balances and to require greater disclosure.

“These practices need to be stopped. … They cannot continue to use and do practices that are unfair to people,” Rep. Carol Maloney, D-NY, told CBS News.

Readers discuss “Survival On the Road To Serfdom.”

Update (April 25): The federal Frankenstein’s latest folly caught Peter Schiff’s attention, and is the subject of his latest column (great minds…). Writes Schiff:

“The bottom line is that credit card lending is a very risky business. The debts are unsecured and the probability of default is high, meaning big losses should borrowers choose not to pay. In addition, should a borrower file for bankruptcy, credit card debt is often the first to be discharged. Given the risks, interest rates need to be very high to keep lenders in business.

One way to keep a lid on rates for those who do pay is for lenders to weed out those most likely to default. This can be accomplished through higher rates. Not only does this discourage riskier borrowers from taking on more debt, but it gives lenders a bigger cushion to absorb losses. However, by interfering with card issuers’ attempts to better price risk and limit losses, the government will reduce credit availability.”

Updated: The Guy Really Doesn’t Get Econ 101

Barack Obama, Business, Debt, Democrats, Economy, Government

State-enforced egalitarianism in borrowing and lending has been a key component in the economic meltdown. But Barry the Bolshevik is intent on preventing any market corrections from taking place.

Financial institutions are attempting to reverse lending socialism. That means charging clients commensurate with the risk they pose to their lenders. Or not lending to the risky. Increases in late fees and in interest rates on existing balances, as well as requiring greater disclosure—these are all necessary, and to be expected, if a correction is to occur, one that incentivizes savings and solvency.

But not if Obama can help it. At Obama’s behest,

Both the House and Senate are considering a credit card “bill of rights” to limit the ability of credit-card companies to raise interest rates on existing balances and to require greater disclosure.

“These practices need to be stopped. … They cannot continue to use and do practices that are unfair to people,” Rep. Carol Maloney, D-NY, told CBS News.

Readers discuss “Survival On the Road To Serfdom.”

Update (April 25): The federal Frankenstein’s latest folly caught Peter Schiff’s attention, and is the subject of his latest column (great minds…). Writes Schiff:

“The bottom line is that credit card lending is a very risky business. The debts are unsecured and the probability of default is high, meaning big losses should borrowers choose not to pay. In addition, should a borrower file for bankruptcy, credit card debt is often the first to be discharged. Given the risks, interest rates need to be very high to keep lenders in business.

One way to keep a lid on rates for those who do pay is for lenders to weed out those most likely to default. This can be accomplished through higher rates. Not only does this discourage riskier borrowers from taking on more debt, but it gives lenders a bigger cushion to absorb losses. However, by interfering with card issuers’ attempts to better price risk and limit losses, the government will reduce credit availability.”

Debt Means Taxes

Debt, Economy, Government, Media, Taxation

“But you’re getting a tax cut under Obama,” screeched the cerebrally and ethically challenged CNN attack dog, Susan Roesgen. She was shouting at an informed, ticked-off taxpayer at the nationwide tea parties. Which is why reporters, retarded ones especially, should never editorialize.

Writes former US accountant and comptroller general, David M. Walker:

Total federal debt almost doubled during President George W. Bush’s administration and, as much as we needed some stimulus spending to boost the economy, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office now estimates total debt levels could almost double again over the next eight years based on the budget recently outlined by President Obama.

Regardless of what politicians tell you, any additional accumulations of debt are, absent dramatic reductions in the size and role of government, basically deferred tax increases. Remember the old saw? “You can pay me now or you can pay me later, with interest.” …

the federal government accumulated $56.4 trillion in total liabilities and unfunded promises for Medicare and Social Security as of September 30, 2008. The numbers used to calculate this figure come directly from the audited financial statements of the U.S. government.

If $56.4 trillion in financial commitments is too big a number to digest, think of it as $483,000 per American household, or $184,000 for every man, woman and child in the country.

Even broken down, the numbers can be tough to swallow. Yes, you’ve paid your taxes, but you still bear a significant share of the government’s own financial burden. …

So as you file your tax returns this year, bear in mind that no matter how much you’re paying now, you’ll pay much more in the future because of Washington’s failure to get its finances in order…