Category Archives: Film

Update # 3: ‘300’: The Real Spartan Supermen (And History’s Deniers)

Critique, Film, The Zeitgeist

Namby-pamby libertarians and Objectivists are forever waxing silly about the comic book creations of Superman or Batman as the quintessential American heroes. How sad and what philosophically childish twaddle. How can any person with a brain take seriously the symbolism that has been squeezed from these characters?

I don’t give a dried camel’s hump for the above nonsense, but the 300 Spartans who, the Battle of Thermopylae, took on over 200,000 Persians intent on invading and enslaving the free Greek city-states —now that’s an entirely different matter. I seldom visit the cinema anymore, but this is a film I intend to see on the big screen. Even if it disappoints —and with a great deal of animation involved, and having already been immortalized as a comic strip, it has the potential to be cartoonish.

The story is nothing short of inspirational and is, quite plainly, the reason for Western Civilization. For if not for those 300 Spartans and 700 Thespian volunteers who placed themselves in the way of the mighty people the historian Herodotus called the “Barbarians,” Western Civilization as we know it would not have come into being.

Whether this film makes this point (as a similar film made in 1962 did) I do not know. If anyone of our readers has seen it, do tell us too whether Herodotus’ appellation for the Persians was used, or whether the screenplay writers reverted to modern-day political correctness.

Ultimately, the 300 and their Thespian brothers-in-arms are not only Greek heroes; they are ours. A nation’s heroes, even mythical, reveal a lot about that nation. Superman and Batman showcase the frivolity of the American psyche.

Update: Debbie Schlussel reviews “300.” “This is a man’s movie,” she writes, which is fine by me. I hate chick flicks. I’ve never seen “Pretty Woman,” or that other film about two all-night drunks or insomniacs engaged in a pity fest, turned love affair. Or something along those soporific lines. The Indian, immigrant-experience film Schlussel raves about above her “300” run-down would make me snooze. I certainly would not inflict it on Sean. The rest of her comments, however, indicate “300” is short on history and long on porn and other grotesqueries, aimed at “the video-gamer slacker dummies,” as she puts it. I was hoping just this time Hollywood would deliver. What a shame. Perhaps we should just all stay home and rent “The 300 Spartans” (1962).

The Deniers Strike/Update: Historical deniers are everywhere with their brand of deceit. I’m no historian, but I certainly don’t intend to give a platform to the pseudo-historians who’ve tried to post comments propounding their idiosyncratic version of the Battle of Thermopylae, positing, first, that the Spartans were just “jerks,” whose strange faith mandated that they stay and fight until the end. Of course, this slight is a non sequitur. Someone can posses a balmy belief system and still exhibit courage and heroism. Moreover, if the Spartans’ faith obligated them to all die if victory was unobtainable, why did Leonidas dismiss the army and retain a select few to stay and fight?

The other misleading statement —or rather outright lie —was that the Spartan’s “stopped nobody and saved no Western civilization whatsoever. They lost, the Persians forwarded, and that was pretty much that.”

The Greeks won thanks to the brilliant strategy Leonidas and his seafaring Athenian colleagues devised. According to Wikipedia:

The fierce resistance of the Spartan-led army offered Athens the invaluable time to prepare for a decisive naval battle that would come to determine the outcome of the war. The subsequent Greek victory at the Battle of Salamis left much of the Persian navy destroyed and Xerxes was forced to retreat back to Asia, leaving his army in Greece under Mardonius, who was to meet the Greeks in battle one last time. The Spartans assembled at full strength and led a pan-Greek army that defeated the Persians decisively at the Battle of Plataea, ending the Greco-Persian War and with it Persian expansion into Europe.

I have a special detestation for the assaults on truth by assorted historical deniers (scroll down to follow other entries on the topic. My Junk Science Archive is useful too, and in particular this and this). This is not the forum for them.

Update # 3: Not that I didn’t know it, but comments on the blog confirm that honorable men aspire to be heroic. Part of the tragedy of modern, metrosexual manhood is the breakdown of more traditional gender roles —a dissolution championed by feminism, its assorted permutations, and the state. Good men have been denied —and denuded of —their need to be defenders.

'A Christmas Story'

Feminism, Film, The West

Set in the 1940s, the film ‘A Christmas Story’ depicts a series of family vignettes through the eyes of 9-year-old Ralphie, who yearns for that gift of all gifts: the Daisy Red Ryder BB gun. This was boyhood before ‘bang-bang you’re dead’ was banned; family life prior to ‘One Dad Two Dads Brown Dad Blue Dads’ and Christmas without the ACLU.

‘A Christmas Story’ is also film before Dakota Fanning (that prototypical, barf-making, American child actor). All the more reason to savor it.

Merry Christmas to all,
ILANA

‘A Christmas Story’

Feminism, Film, The West

Set in the 1940s, the film ‘A Christmas Story’ depicts a series of family vignettes through the eyes of 9-year-old Ralphie, who yearns for that gift of all gifts: the Daisy Red Ryder BB gun. This was boyhood before ‘bang-bang you’re dead’ was banned; family life prior to ‘One Dad Two Dads Brown Dad Blue Dads’ and Christmas without the ACLU.

‘A Christmas Story’ is also film before Dakota Fanning (that prototypical, barf-making, American child actor). All the more reason to savor it.

Merry Christmas to all,
ILANA

Updated for the Third Time: Borat’s Cultural Learnings

America, Anti-Semitism, Film, Hollywood, Media

On Saturday, I caught the matinee screening of Sacha Baron Cohen’s “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan.” It’s well-worth seeing. The man is a great comedian.
I like the way Cohen only interviews in character, as Borat, never revealing who he is. Reviewers haven’t been hip to this tactic. Cohen’s transformation into the unattractive Borat (and equally awful Ali G and Bruno) is remarkable, considering he’s quite a dish.

This next “learning” is probably only available on Barely a Blog, but, for what it’s worth, when Borat and Azamat Bagatov (his Kazakh “producer”) talk, Borat rattles off in Hebrew. Azamat is speaking in tongues, for all I know. Cohen can speak Hebrew, but his accent is not the best.

Here’s a very funny Vanity-Fair interview with Borat Sagdiyev. In response to the question, “Who is your favorite American celebrity and why,” Borat writes:

“My favorites celebritys is dancing Negro Michael Jacksons, singing transvestite Madonna, and, of course, fearless anti-Jew warrior Mel Gibsons. We in Kazakhstan agrees with his statement that Jews started all wars and also have proof that they were responsible for Hurricane Katrina and also killed off the dinosaurs.”

Update: Those of you with a funny bone will find the following hard to believe. Around the Internet, the dour and dreary (that includes Abe Foxman) are decimating Borat for his high-wire antics, and accusing his creator, Baron Cohen:

* Of promoting anti-Semitism (“In one scene Borat insists on driving to California rather than flying, ‘in case the Jews repeat their attack of 9/11′”).
* Of libeling America as endemically anti-Semitic, even though Americans come off (as I pointed out in “Fun in Kazakhstan“) as kind, sweet, polite, and infinitely patient with “this delightful fellow,” as one of his gracious Southern hosts mischaracterizes the bumbling Borat.
* Of harboring an imperial mindset (this is by far the kookiest complaint) because he victimizes and patronizes Kazakhstan. (“In Kazakhstan we say, ‘God, man, horse, dog, then woman, then rat.'” Also according to Borat, the national sport in Kazakhstan is shooting a dog and then having a party. You can earn a living being a Gypsy catcher. Wine is made from fermented horse urine. Kazakh villages all have a Village Rapist.)

Sorry, I had to stop writing—cracked up remembering Borat’s reference to Bush as the “mighty warlord.” The guy’s a satirist—a funny, one-of-a-kind comedian. Only losers “analyze” Cohen, aka Borat, alias Ali G-cum-Bruno.

Updated Again: At last, Alvaro Vargas Llosa of The Independent Institute has a decent defense of Boart as “simply anarchic.” Here’s an excerpt:

“I have read that Borat is a left-winger in disguise. This doesn’t square with his mockery of feminists (“give me a smile, baby, why the angry face”) and of a black politician with whom he discusses homosexuality. I have also read that Borat is a right-wing fascist. It doesn’t quite square with the scene at the rodeo in where he persuades the organizers to let him sing “The Star-Spangled Banner” only to launch into an intentionally satirical tirade against Iraq (“I hope you kill every man, woman, and child in Iraq, down to the lizards”). No, Borat is simply anarchic—there is no institution, idea, cultural value or government he does not find worthy of being picked apart through humor. It’s always healthy to take a second look at the way we all live.”

Updated for the Third Time: Where did you first learn Borat was speaking Hebrew? On BAB, of course. Here’s the confirmation–in case you needed one.