Category Archives: Hillary Clinton

Speak English To America, Mr. ‘Si Se Puede’ Hip-Swaying Kaine!

When Jeb Bush’s rattled off in Spanish on the campaign trail, Donald Trump had a classic response (source: The Trump Revolution): “I like Jeb. He’s a nice man. But he should really set the example by speaking English while in the United States.”

The same can be said of Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, Hillary Clinton’s nullity of a running mate, who is showing off his Spanish now. “Si se puede,” and other indecipherable phrases came tumbling from his mouth for the occasion. Kaine can certainly move those hips to the 60s, Temptations song, “Get-ready, here I come.” Looks like Hill’s aging live wire might have curled his eyelashes for his big night.

Most of the Kaine speech is peppered with Spanish colloquialisms. He’s also calling American presidents by their first names, in a rather repulsive quest for coolness. Or something. Sick-making.

The Libertarian Book Of TRUMP by ilana mercer

Classical Liberalism, Conservatism, Constitution, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton

The latest column, “The Libertarian Book Of TRUMP,” is now on Townhall.com, America’s “top source for conservative … commentary.” An excerpt:

In a new book, “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed,” I argue that Donald J. Trump is the quintessential post-constitutional candidate.

In the “Opening Statement,” titled “Welcome To The Post-Constitutional Jungle,” oldies will recognize a nod to the Guns N’ Roses classic, “Welcome to the Jungle,” as well as to broadcaster Mark Levin’s coinage.

We inhabit what Levin has termed a post-constitutional America. The libertarian (and classical conservative) ideal—where the chains that tether us to an increasingly tyrannical national government are loosened and power is devolved once again to the smaller units of society—is a long way away.

Where the law of the jungle prevails, the options are limited: Do Americans get a benevolent authoritarian to undo the legacies of Barack Obama, George W. Bush and those who went before? Or, does the ill-defined entity called The People continue to submit to Demopublican diktats, past and present?

The quintessential post-constitutional candidate, Trump’s candidacy is for the age when the Constitution itself is unconstitutional. Like it or not, the original Constitution is a dead letter, having suffered decades of legislative, executive and judicial usurpation. The natural- and common law traditions, once loadstars for lawmakers, have been buried under the rubble of legislation and statute. However much one shovels the muck of lawmaking aside, natural justice and the Founders’ original intent remain buried too deep to exhume. The Constitution has become just another thing on the list of items presidential candidates check when they con constituents.

The dissembling words of many a Republican presidential candidate notwithstanding—for most promise constitutionalism—a liberty-lover’s best hope is to see the legacy of the dictator who went before overturned for a period of time. The toss-up in the 2016 election is therefore between submitting to the Democrats’ war on whites, the wealthy and Wal-Mart, or being bedeviled by mainstream Republicans’ wars on the world: Russia, China, Assad and The Ayatollahs.

Or, suffering all the depredations listed and more if Candidate Clinton is victorious.

Thus the endorsement over the pages of “The Trump Revolution” is not necessarily for the policies of Trump, but for The Process of Trump.

Until such time when the individual is king again, and a decentralized Constitution that guarantees regional and individual autonomy has been restored—this process of creative destruction begun by Donald Trump is likely the best Americans can hope for. Put differently, in this age of unconstitutional government—Democratic and Republican—the best liberty lovers can look to is action and counteraction, force and counterforce in the service of liberty …

… Read the rest. The complete column, “The Libertarian Book Of TRUMP,” is now on Townhall.com.

The Other Talk Hillary Clinton & BHO Refuse To Have

Crime, Criminal Injustice, Hillary Clinton, Race, Racism

A “conversation” is what black activists—led by Barack Obama, followed obediently and wickedly by Hillary Clinton—are dubbing the Orwellian obscenity they’re foisting on the nation, through their megaphones in media, ever since the wave of hate crimes against white policemen commenced.

“African-American families … fear every time their children go somewhere, … have to have the talk about how to really protect themselves … from encounters with police,” parroted Clinton about The Talk blacks must allegedly have with their frightened kids, living in hellish America.

There’s Another Talk that dare not be discussed. Columnist John Derbyshire had The Other Talk with his kids and tried to have it with America. For his troubles, Derbyshire was dismissed from National Review, and soon became a national pariah.

The Other Talk You Can’t Have In America is discussed (and critiqued some) in “National Review Eunuchs.”

Bernie Must Be Feeling Extra Foolish

Democrats, Elections, Hillary Clinton

“You’ve got a situation here where the woman [Hillary Clinton] who would be in charge of setting national security policy as president has been deemed by the F.B.I. unsuitable to safeguard and handle classified information.”—Washington lawyer specializing in security clearances, New York Times:

Though Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch formally affirmed on Wednesday that the Justice Department would not seek criminal charges against anyone in the email case, fallout from the matter is sure to affect several dozen State Department advisers who, records show, facilitated Mrs. Clinton’s unorthodox email arrangement or used it to send her classified documents.
Among those drawing the most intense scrutiny are Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, onetime aides who could face difficult questions in pursuing security clearances for diplomatic or national security posts because of their involvement with Mrs. Clinton’s emails. (… MORE)

Even the NYT can no longer ignore Clinton’s stupid conduct. I bet Bernie Sanders is feeling like an even bigger fool than he is for papering over his rival’s rotten judgment.

“In the first Democratic debate, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said people are sick of hearing about Hillary Clinton’s ‘damn emails.” Sanders might have had a chance against the Clinton Machine had he driven home the “bad judgment” point. Instead, he spent the primaries obsequiously apologizing to her highness like the mouse he is.