Category Archives: Hillary Clinton

UPDATED (8/16): The World According To ‘Crooked’ Hillary And Her Gyno-Brigade

Capitalism, Debt, Feminism, Gender, Hillary Clinton

“It was only right that Hillary Clinton’s first general election speech was before Planned Parenthood on Friday,” blared the headline on MSNBC.com. Well of course. That’s what’s on my mind. I can’t stop thinking dilation and curettage (D&C), not the $19 trillion debt and the terrifying prospect of negative interest rates, which you know is on Donald Trump’s mind (perhaps someone should tell him to talk about negative interest rates!!!!!!!!!!!!).

What do you think Hillary and her gyno-brigade know about markets, capital formation and the importance of savings to investment—and to civilization? I don’t know about you, but when I see Hillary flanked, backed and surrounded by a kaleidoscope of bossy, angry, teary, aggrieved-looking females, girly men and the likes of Rajiv K. Fernando; I just know that things are going to be alright.

Were the American media not as crooked as Hillary, the headlines, in addition to the jobs report and the prospects for savers, should have been, “Stunning Emails Reveal How Clinton Foundation Donor Bought Seat As Hillary’s Nuclear Weapons Advisor.” The last is a report on Zero Hedge. While CNN TV has reported on the Clinton donor scandal; there is nothing, for now, on the CNN site to that effect.

The Google search engine has “forgotten” to sweep up the story for its search. I tried and came up with Zero Hedge only.

READ the story of Rajiv K. Fernando’s—I think he even made superdelegate—and how he got his seat on the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB).

Yes, what do you suppose “Pocahontas,” aka Elizabeth Warren (touted as Hillary’s VP), knows about capital markets, capital formation, savings, or the impact of negative interest rates on all the above?

UPDATE (8/16): “Look at the lovely faces surrounding Trump on rallies, compared to the malevolent-looking motley crew that goes with Clinton.”

UPDATE II (6/10/016): Sanders And The Superdelegate Swindle

Democrats, Donald Trump, Elections, Hillary Clinton, Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim

Granted, Hillary Clinton hasn’t won the Democratic nomination soley because of the superdelegate swindle. As NBC reported, “She’s way ahead in votes and pledged delegates—that is, those picked by voters—too.”

Still, this does not mean the superdelegate set-up is not ripe with conflict of interest and corruption. Every second Democratic pundit pontificating on TV admits to doubling up as a superdelegate for the Democratic Party. How many Dems in Congress and the Senate are super-swindlers?

This is excerpted from my book, “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed,” due out by June’s end:

Like Trump, Bernie Sanders has appealed to his restive base over the heads of the DNC. Alas, the populist Left’s favorite son has been sidelined by similar forces, not least the superdelegate subterfuge, where Party Bosses such as President Obama, Vice President Biden, former President Bill Clinton and his vice president, Al Gore—superdelegates all—get to tip the scales of justice.

We are still quite civilized in our electoral wheeling-and-dealing, but this is a thin cultural veneer. The American electoral process is cleverly corrupt, as I pointed out in “Banana Republicans.”

UPDATE I (6/9): “HISTORY! Trump Shatters Republican Primary Vote Record by 1.4 Million Votes”:

Hillary Clinton pulled out the win with more delegates than socialist Sanders. However, nearly a quarter of her delegates came from controversial ‘super delegates’. Her road to the Democratic nomination was far less impressive and may also go down in history because she may be under indictment before the November election.

UPDATE II (6/10):: ‘Define irony’ say folks on Facebook:

UPDATED (6/9): What Larry Kudlow & Stephen Moore Are Hiding About Bush & Housing Bubble

Bush, Hillary Clinton, Private Property, Regulation, Republicans

George W. Bush did his share to bring about the housing bubble, and Stephen Moore, formerly of the Wall Street Journal, knows it. Moore wrote a book he’d like us to forget: “Bullish on Bush: How the Ownership Society Is Making America Richer” (2004). “Bullish” got one and a half stars on Amazon and it had almost no takers. Moore and Larry Kudlow have no business obfuscating about Number 43’s enthusiasm for giving credit to those who were not creditworthy.

Lawrence B. Lindsey, Mr. Bush’s first chief economics adviser, said there was little impetus to raise alarms about the proliferation of easy credit that was helping Mr. Bush meet housing goals. “No one wanted to stop that bubble,” Mr. Lindsey said. “It would have conflicted with the president’s own policies.”

The two’s article, “Are the Clintons the Real Housing-Crash Villains?”, offers only a veiled allusion to the shared Clinton-Bush blame for the housing bubble:

There was plenty of blame to go around among both political parties and the horde of housing lobbyists who helped set up this real estate house of cards. It’s a sordid story. And the Fannie/Freddie chapter is still not solved. It now includes profit-sweeping from shareholders to the government, thereby ending any chance to sell the mortgage agencies back to the private sector.

But not a word about Bush II. And no mea culpa from Moore for his zeal for Bush’s phony “ownership society.”

UPDATE (6/9/016):

Comments Off on UPDATED (6/9): What Larry Kudlow & Stephen Moore Are Hiding About Bush & Housing Bubble

Written by on

TESTOSTERONE, Going, Going, Almost Gone

Democrats, Donald Trump, Feminism, Gender, Hillary Clinton, Republicans

“TESTOSTERONE, Going, Going, Almost Gone” IS THE CURRENT column, now on WND. An excerpt:

There are only two men in the 2016 presidential race: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

Like or dislike her, there’s no questioning Hillary’s manly bona fides. Mrs. Clinton is as tough as she’s philosophically misguided.

At the first Democratic debate, on October 14, 2015, Bernie Sanders, Martin O’Malley and Lincoln Chafee shuffled meekly to their respective podiums.

Only Jim Webb and Mrs. Clinton strode onto that stage like soldiers.

Unless her handlers coach her on acting femininely, you’ll never catch Hillary blubbering about Bill and Chelsea coming first in her life.

She doesn’t!

They don’t (come first)!

No, siree. For Hillary, it’s ambition before family.

Still, when Hillary expects it to pay political dividends, she fights like a girl, claws drawn.

Her April 19 victory in the New York primary, April 19, could hardly be bettered. But it’s unlikely to soften Mrs. Clinton’s sharpshooting. She and rival Bernie Sanders have been locked in a cycle of sorts, where Sanders will try mightily to stand up to Hillary, and she’ll swat him down like a fly.

Incredibly, Sanders is too petrified to lay the ruination of Libya at Hillary’s sturdy feet. And he has only to recount the ambient horrors of Hillary’s foreign policy—the vote for “the disastrous war in Iraq,” for one—and Mrs. Clinton’s Amazon Warriors at CNN and elsewhere crow, “Is Bernie Sanders taking the low road?”

It’s a little late in the game, but April saw Bernie try his utmost to expose Mrs. Clinton’s record for all to see. His thundering, “Hillary Clinton isn’t qualified to be president,” however, soon gave way to a whimper, a squeak, a “she started it”; “I would have preferred an issue-oriented campaign.” Mumble-mumble. “Where’s my mommy?”

Sanders finally settled on, “I question her judgment, not experience.” The senator was soon bowing-and-scraping again because a surrogate attached the words “corporate Democratic whores” to Hillary’s incremental approach to socializing the medical means of production. (Yes, Sanders’ Fabian fondness for the state, economic planning and centralization exceeds Hillary’s.)

Sanders’ resistance in the face of ruthless machine politics mounted on behalf of Clinton by Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been flaccid. At the same time, the senator has been fierce in his defense of Hillary’s email security breaches as secretary of state. He famously fought off Hillary’s critics, neutering himself with this zinger:

“The American people are sick and tired [of] hearing about your damn emails.”

Compared to battle-axe Clinton, Sanders is a mouse, not a man.

Early in March, The Mouse scolded The Man for interrupting him. Said the timid Sanders, “Excuse me, I’m talking.” Right away, the gynocentric national media erupted in a “debate” that revolved around a preposterous proposition:

Was poor Bernie sexist?

Of course, Methuselah jumps to attention whenever Hillary reprimands him for his failure to stand by President Barack Obama on gun control.

And who can forget when, in August of 2015, socialist-in-Seattle Sanders skedaddled as a couple of girl protesters got in his face and grabbed his mic?

Don’t let Hillary’s “wife, mom, grandma” routine fool you. That’s her Twitter handle; that’s not her.

You sense that if she had her way, Hillary would ditch the familial shtick. But Hill’s a smart cookie; she goes through the “wife, mom, grandma” motions because she must.

Unlike mucho Hillary, some other “men” racing for the White House have successfully “transitioned,” as Caitlyn Jenner would say. …

… READ THE REST. “TESTOSTERONE, Going, Going, Almost Gone” IS THE CURRENT column, now on WND.

UPDATED (4/22):