Category Archives: The Zeitgeist

Realism Or Racism? (& Excellence Vs. Offal)

English, Literature, Racism, The Zeitgeist

I never tire of commending—and recommending—the generally apolitical Times Literary Supplement for its intellectual rigor. I’m equally energetic when it comes to berating that bit of dreck, the New York Review of Books, for its pamphleteering. The latter’s obtuse art and book critiques, interspersed as they are with lengthy political essays on the undisputed purity of Hamas or Cuban-styled healthcare, fall into the category of agitprop.

In a preface to his review of two books dealing broadly with the fraught topic of racial—or what I term rational—profiling, the TLS’s James Bowman doesn’t disappoint. He quotes the former Education Secretary, William Bennett, who created an uproar by saying that,—If you wanted to reduce crime, you could—if that were your sole purpose—you could abort every black baby in this country and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossibly ridiculous and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down.'”

“The remark,” observes Bowman matter-of-fact, “was widely characterized as ‘racist’ and President Bush was called upon to disavow the views of his fellow Republican—and he obliged with that new favorite substitute for moral judgement, the word ‘inappropriate.’ Yet while doubtless tactless—the sort of deliberate provocative comment that delights the philosophy professor, which is what Bennett used to be—his words had been in substance nothing more that a statement of the undisputed fact that in America black people proportionately commit more crimes than whites.” (My emphasis; Bowman’s words)

To underscore my original point, the TLS is generally liberal (although more classically so) but is committed to a heuristic pursuit of truth and excellence. The NYRB is left-liberal and dedicated to the crass promotion of specific political perspectives. If it reluctantly succumbs and discusses “the color of crime,” the “debate” is carefully in root-causes circumlocution and strictly confined to the Three P’s—the pale patriarchy, poverty, and powerlessness. No wonder the TLS is sophisticated and fascinating and the NYRB as pedestrian and dull as any good Bolshevik bulletin.

The Inexpert Juan Cole

Media, The Zeitgeist

When he’s good he’s very good. Christopher Hitchens demonstrates fairly proficiently that professor Juan Cole of the University of Michigan—a “minor nuisance on the fringes of the academic Muslim apologist community”—cannot “decipher the plain meaning of a celebrated [Persian] statement and is, furthermore, in need of a remedial course in English.” (I knew the bit about Cole’s flawed English, of course.)

Cole, believe it or not, has denied that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or indeed Khomeini, have called for the removal of Israel from the map. The full account is here: “The Cole Report: When it comes to Iran, he distorts, you decide.”

Morality Play Featuring Mohammed

Islam, Media, The Zeitgeist

There is no mystery as to why Comedy Central blackened out the image of Mohammed in a recent episode of South Park; the network openly confessed to mortally fearing Muslim reaction. But why was it almost compelled simultaneously to depict Jesus in such a demeaning position?
I think that, in stream-of-consciousness mode, the episode got out of hand, gathering its own momentum and becoming the stage for a little morality play. On display was the dynamic interaction between the bully barbarians and the civil and servile West, with the writers assuming the atavistic, base persona of the aggressors.
Thus, once the victim (the West) was deemed metaphorically supine and the aggressor had smelt his blood—and fear—he, Ã la the Muslim Ummah, moved in for the kill, compelling the dhimmi to squat and perform degrading acts. (I can almost hear cries of, “Dance, Jew, dance.”)

Updated: Muhammad on the Cover of "The New Individualist"

Islam, The Zeitgeist

The winter-2006 issue of The New Individualist should be on sale any day now. Robert J. Bidinotto, TNI’s perfectionist editor (actually, he’s a slave driver), reveals that:

[H]e is the editor of the first magazine in America (to the best of his knowledge) to have PUBLISHED THE MOST “OFFENSIVE” OF THOSE DANISH CARTOON DEPICTIONS OF MUHAMMAD RIGHT ON THE MAGAZINE’S COVER.

And that:

The issue… contains a number of great articles, essays, and reviews by the likes of constitutional law expert Henry Mark Holzer, columnist Ilana Mercer, filmmaker Duncan Scott, art expert Michelle Marder Kamhi, and essayists Roger Donway and Lou Villadsen.

I review Paul Sperry’s Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.

You can find out about The New Individualist, get a free sample copy, or subscribe, by clicking here.

Update: Robert Bidinotto’s cover-art decision has generated tons of support. Read Michelle Malkin’s write-up. Praise from Samizdata is here. This is a good time to subscribe to the only magazine in the country to have featured the most controversial drawing, smack-dab where it can’t be missed.