Letter of the Week: Murderous Condescension By Prof. Dennis O’Keeffe

Intellectualism, Race, Socialism, South-Africa

I just read your fine and frightening piece on South Africa. The following may not be original, but it needs saying again. No one is more racist and condescending than white socialist intellectuals, strangely called “liberals” in the United States, perhaps because they are so liberal with other people’s money. White conservatives sometimes dislike black people and Asians, though this is a less and less common thing among young conservatives. Such dislike even when it occurs does not work in conjunction with hatred and a desire to hurt people. Socialist intellectuals, of the kind who in Britain control most Broadcasting—and many university departments across a whole range of disciplines—regard black people as virtually subhuman, without souls or conscience or any moral sensibilities. In Britain, Apartheid South Africa was never out of the news. Today the horrors of South Africa never hit the headlines. The point is that the white intelligentsia care only about offences committed by white people. They are seen as the only ones capable of autonomous immorality.

This kind of reasoning explains why Nazism is taken by so many Western thinkers as the surest standard of evil. It is because an unambiguously and self-consciously white race performed the Nazi horrors. The crimes of Communism, in which the numbers murdered were far greater, are dismissed because they were carried out by the semi-Asiatic Russians or by the unambiguously Asiatic and comic Chinese.

Until the world learns to impose the same moral requirements at all people’s doors, regardless of their various racial compositions, we will never get out of this habit of murderous condescension.

Dennis

Updated Again: A Storm in a Tea Cup, Apparently

Environmentalism & Animal Rights, Media, The Zeitgeist

The first thing to note in the aftermath of the biggest windstorm to hit Washington and Oregon in decades is the lack of coverage in MSM. The feminized media allots plenty of coverage to human interest stories–the girls are currently eulogizing endlessly the “experienced” mountaineers gone up Mount Hood during the most treacherous month of the year, just before one of the biggest blizzards ever. (Hey, do a story about electricity deprived, peeved pets or something.) But nothing about at least a million residents in the Pacific Northwest stranded without power for days, in primitive conditions, befitting a Third World country–or perhaps states overrun by greens, where the Prius is the “People’s Car.”

Well, as I say, we were plunged into a primitive, Third-World existence. Temperatures in my home plummeted to 45 degrees for 4 days. We coped thanks to the generosity of a neighbor with a massive generator. Now that I know I live at the mercy of Luddites, I fully intend to go survivalist: a generator, extra gas for the BBQ (I made a stew with the remaining chicken in my freezer, although I was forced to discard the rest of the meat and fish therein), and piles of candles.

So what are the questions Journalism of Old would have asked here? Utilities are only nominally private and are heavily regulated. How have regulations affected their response times and, most crucially, the maintenance of the power grid? Should power lines be buried? Why aren’t they? (Earthquakes would be one consideration, in addition to costs.)

But above all: the grid and power lines suffered mostly tree damage. In this part of the world, the trees everywhere are intertwined with the cable. Why? Why isn’t a wide tree-free swath maintained around these vital structures? Why are trees not chopped back?

I suspect the explanation lies in the self-defeating dementia of tree fetishists, and “Watermelon” legislation — green on the outside; red on the inside. However, as usual, the “Watermelon” worldview creates more havoc than it prevents. Because of wood fires, the usually pristine air in our part of the world resembles the air above the shanty town of Soweto. The resources and energy spent–and the lives lost–because of this mess are many times the cost or worth of a few thousand trees.

Update: While MSNBC noodles on for hours about the “experienced” climbers of Mt. Hood, and their relatives who, like all Americans, have an amazing knack for suctioning themselves to TV cameras and addressing “the nation” in their time of sorrow, some residents of King County, WA, got told they may be without power for yet another two weeks.

Updated Again: S. Johnson of Oregon backs up what I’ve surmised so far. He writes: Thank you for telling it like it is. We are on a private, co-operative power co. (Blachly-Lane), and they do exactly what you suggested be done as far as maintaining a tree-free zone around power lines. The Greens/tree huggers/libs thwart their efforts to a degree, as do liberal property owners, so guess what? The trouble we do experience is ALWAYS on/around their property! “They” never get it. I have a neighbor that refuses to let the power co. install a pole on his property because he maintains that it isn’t necessary as it’s been that way for 40 years and he is not going to change his mind. Guess what again? The power outages caused by winds are ALWAYS because the power lines span such a long distance over his property that they whip severely and bring down the poles! EVERY TIME! Yes, during the storm, down came the power pole and we, and about 500 others, were out of power for 23 hrs. Not a big deal for us, as I have generators, but some others don’t. I’ve lived here for 31 years (it’s a very rural area) and our power co. only serves about 2500 customers. I have talked to the “neighbor.” He is a Berkley educated hobby farmer who is as stuck on himself as he is dense. I’m sure he can absorb light. Won’t budge even when the facts are overwhelmingly against him. Oh, well, I won’t bore you anymore. Thanks for letting me vent. Keep up the good work and MERRY CHRISTMAS to you.

Updated: The Ugly Truth About Democratic South Africa

South-Africa

“I sincerely hope that events in Iraq have inched Americans toward a less Disneyfied view of democracy. It is a mistake to doggedly conflate democracy with freedom, and “the freedom to vote” with liberty. Majority rule, especially as it applies in Middle Eastern and African countries, doesn’t always empower the right people.

Which brings me to another, less-than Magic Kingdom: my old homeland, South Africa, RIP.

The irony of President Bush’s December-8 meeting with Thabo Mbeki, South Africa’s president, went unnoticed. Democratic South Africa is yet another spot where the rule of the demos has turned a once-prosperous, if politically problematic, place into a lawless ramshackle.

South Africa is now the most violent country outside a war zone.”

The excerpt is from my new WorldNetDaily.com column, “The Ugly Truth About Democratic South Africa.”

Update: A special guest shares her impressions of her birthplace, South-Africa, after a recent visit:

While reading the excellent BLOG reply of Shaka Mehlomakulu, I was impressed by his clarity and intensely knowledgeable criticism of South Africa. He presents the truth as it is unfolding today, and having been there, this very year, and being a native born South African, now living abroad, I can confirm that all that he says is actual and true.

There is almost total press censorship. The true facts are never shown with regard to crime — and the murders, the hijackings and the violence perpetrated against the white farmers.

Wait until these excellent farmers — men of strength and courage and enormous knowledge of cattle, harvests, sheep, pastures, modern equipment — have been so intimidated through violence and slaughter, that they disappear from the South African farming scene. Then all havoc will reign and the wretched South African citizen, both white and black, will rue the day that democracy, that obscene word, was forced onto South Africa.

The politicians are filling their pockets with their ill-gotten gains, the system of enforced black “partners” in every S.A. business is scandalous; nothing better than robbery of every business in South Africa.

Thankfully, somehow, I emigrated at an early age, taking with me my two children, one of whom, Ilana Mercer, has become such a brave voice of freedom. How proud I am of my daughter Ilana and all her knowledge and truth.

—Ann Wendy

Update: Please refer to “Dispatches From the Bloody South African Front” as well.

Letter of the Week: The Banality of Feminism in All Permutations

Feminism, The Zeitgeist

ALEX WRITES:

I never really cared for Paglia. I thought her another feminist, and I guess these comments make it so.

When I read how she felt that a majority of men envied women’s reproductive ability—to have children—I scratched my head. I can’t remember the last time I felt the need to become pregnant.

I never liked Tom Cruise until his excellent performance of the contract killer, “Vincent,” in the terrific Collateral. His glib nihilism and ruthless zeal was conveyed with a subtle performance that some might miss. It was a refreshing and surprising turn from an actor who had given us such dreck as Top Gun and that awful, can’t-remember-its-name, Daytona movie.

Back to Paglia: how is the trumpeting of sex by Britney Spears and her ilk bad for the sex movement? Isn’t that what the sex movement is all about? And what’s with this mundane “pro-sex” ideal that she speaks of? Is she a libertine? Gross. [Related read: On Sexual Bombast and Bliss]

For another taste of the nasties, check out the posts from other feminists on the board, who are complaining and wailing that public crotch shots and nudity are, “Like, soooo tame, and like, get over it already—it’s HER body, after all.”

Wonder if the same thing could be said if a disgusting, overweight plumber was caught flashing his penis in public. Would the hip press be debating whether or not it was a career move, or would they state that he was a disgusting and disturbed man? Would these women come to his aid, because it was, “Like, HIS body, ‘after all’?”

—Alex