printThe following is an excerpt from “Mother’s Day Disturbia: Porno Mom And Her Sucky Kid”:
“Unseemliness” is how Charles Murray might call the May 2012 Time Magazine cover, genuflecting to modern motherhood in America. In “Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010,” the libertarian political scientist mentions the “collapse of a sturdy code” [of conduct] in American society, rendering the nouveau riche upper class indistinguishable in that sense from the ever-accreting lower class.
“Obscene” better captures the mien of the Madonna and child that brazenly stare into the camera—and at America. TIME’s cover-models are Jamie Lynne Grumet, 26, self-styled, “attachment” parent, and Aram, her chunky, garden gnome of a child. …
In any event, Aram is a real feeder, if you know what I mean.
Grumet junior is large for his tender age of four. His gaze is cunning, never cute. The miniature man already reaches up to his non-gnomic mom’s waist. To help Aram reach the prized pair—mom’s perky breasts—TIME’s artistic director has used a stool.
All the better to satisfy mom’s “maternal” urges, “Nudge nudge, wink wink. Say no-more, say no-more.”
One other tender touch: Porno-mom’s pelvis is tilted slightly in the direction of her gnome’s grubby hands.
At this stage, bullying would be the best corrective intervention this kid could hope for. In a better world—one in which propriety had not been pulverized—odious Aram would be taunted mercilessly at play school. Were he to make it that far, boob-boy is sure to be smacked about the head by a few manly college boys, later in life.
For now, Aram remains the play thing of bigger bullies, caught as he is in a maelstrom of mommy dearest’s making. Horrified, television spectators watched the advocacy for the onansim known as “attachment parenting,” with the fascination with which you’d watch maggots crawl in-and-out of a CSI corpse.
“A lot of people say, you know, you can’t really be intimate with your husband if you’re co-sleeping and … those are kind of myths, too,” vaporized Mrs. Grumet on NBC’s Today show, to the leering approval of the mad-hatter behind Jamie Lynne Grumet’s Method Parenting.
Dr. William Sears was on set to dispense Delphic advice to moms who don’t measure-up. “These are tools, not rules,” this tool of a doctor effused.
Viewers of this uniquely American vaudeville were assured by Mrs. Grumet that…
Read the complete column, “Mother’s Day Disturbia: Porno Mom And Her Sucky Kid,” now on RT.
If you’d like to feature this column in or on your publication (paper or pixels), contact ilana@ilanamercer.com.
Support this writer’s work by clicking to “Recommend,” “Tweet” and “Share” “Return To Reason” on WND, and the “Paleolibertarian Column” on RT.
UPDATE: THE NOBLE SAVAGE MODEL. There is no way that what this “boob of very little brain” is doing is right. She has conditioned the boy to be a nuisance and a cling-on to satisfy her (possibly not maternal) needs.
Somehow people defer to Third-World women as a models to emulate. Why? Is it because backward is more natural? As I point out in my book, Into The Cannibal’s Pot, these women often breast-feed their toddlers even when they themselves are HIV positive, for fear of being stigmatized by their tribesmen and women. Is this model of magical, irrational thinking one that the morons of the western media are promoting?
Besides, in primitive, poor societies, what you see are women who are forced to let starving toddlers, who might weigh what a one-year-old western toddler would, hang on their shriveled breasts—breasts that yield very little by way of fluid. This “practice” is dictated, mostly, by starvation.
The Noble Savage argument is ignoble. It is no model for advanced, western societies. All Arguments from Primitive Cultures for the “onanism” of “attachment parenting” are plain pathetic.
The rival to Time’s Prurient Cover has Newsweek annointing our Messianic President with “sainthood” for sanctifying gay marriage (although the gutless Obama, in his typical self-centered hypocrisy, actually did nothing). One of my distant relatives whose kid attended Jewish Day School with my daughter posted on Facebook praise for Israel for hosting a Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv (do we additionally praise them if they have a Cannabilism Parade in Haifa, Baal Worship in Bnai Brak and a Torah Desecration Bonfire in Jerusalem??). Meanwhile, I got denounced because I donate to the “evil homophobic Salvation Army” which provided aid to 30,000,000 people last year (I don’t think they did sexuality tests in order to get a cup of Chowder or emergency shelter in the winter!).
I’m apathetic concerning every individual’s personal perversion and two guys in love or some Mom-Son silliness is not going to make me imitate this – why can’t people keep their lives PRIVATE?? But why heap praise upon this nonsense????
This was foreseen by Prophet Isaiah:
“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
http://bible.cc/isaiah/5-20.htm
Myron, the reason people “come out of the closet” and make public their perversions is that they hate themslves and want some sort of public acceptance, grudging though it is. If they force their way into the norm then they can delude themselves that they are the norm. The rest of us then become bigots. Me, a bigot? You bet I am.
For a metaphor of the ‘mammy’ State add a dozen whelps.
This whole “attachment parenting” thing is bizarre to me. When I saw that photo, I truly thought that kid was at least 10 years old!! To me, this whole parenting fad is to treat children as “mini-me’s”, devoid of any individuality.
I’m not a parent, although I would like to have children. I thought the point of having children was to raise them to be independent entities. Breast-feeding a child until 4 years old is not healthy.
What is that aphorism? “Idle hands … humma, humma, ….”.
This seems to be an interesting case of perception. Were this image on the front of a Hustler magazine, would it not then qualify as “Child Porn”?