The Hue of Hatred III

Crime,Justice,Law,Race,Racism

            
Print Friendly, PDF & Emailprint

“It was brutal,” the mother of murdered anchorwoman Anne Pressly said. “Blood all over the walls; [I] could not recognize her.” Curtis Lavelle Vance crushed the face of the Little Rock, Ark., TV presenter beyond recognition. “Five days after the attack, Pressly’s brain stem ruptured and she died.”

As was already mentioned in “The Hue of Hatred II”:

The details of the crime indicate, very plainly, that the murderer wanted to obliterate his victim, make her exist no longer. The intention of the title is to point to the near-complete unidirectionality of violent crime—black on white—both in my new and former homelands.

Vance needs killing. If justice is served, he will get his just deserts.

6 thoughts on “The Hue of Hatred III”

  1. M. B. Moon

    Until 1947, half of the states had the death penalty for rape. I always thought that penalty was reasonable. What a sick planet. It will be a very big Miracle if the End doesn’t come soon.

  2. Eric Miller

    Last week the President signed a $680 million defense spending authorization, attached to which was the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. I wish that more Americans were aware of Eric Holder’s statements on hate crimes to the Senate Judiciary Committee, wherein he admitted that only historically “singled out” groups fall within the purview of the legislation.

    At least Holder was being honest.

    The carjacking/kidnapping/robbery/torture/rape/murder of white Knoxville couple Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom — for which all responsible parties should have received the death penalty — will never rise to the level of a “hate crime,” no matter how obvious the media and legal lopsidedness that would ensured a different result had the races been reversed. That case, along with the two-hour gang-rape of a 15-year-old high school student also reported last week, are perhaps the most disturbing news items I have ever had the displeasure of reading.

  3. George Pal

    There is, of course, brainwashing, having metastasized from college campuses (student indoctrination sessions before the first class is attended) up to corporate sensitivity sessions (a racket) and down to elementary school lessons (an outrage). But there are also those who, having escaped the mental shapeshifting, are nevertheless intimidated from acknowledging, openly, the obvious, for obvious reasons – fear – fear of having to pay too high a price for simply stating 2 + 2 = 4.

  5. Bob Harrison

    Our press corp omits stories about black-on-white crime but sensationalizes allegations of white-on-black crime (Duke rape anyone?). This behavior truly terrifies me.
    It is not just behaving irresponsibly for the sake of profits; nothing attracts viewers like headlines involving young white women in trouble. It is a deliberate attempt to avoid rousing the anger of the rapidly growing white underclass. They have no problem rousing the anger of our black underclass, and have incited a few riots. A paper in Ohio reported that “white police officers were shooting blacks.” Of course what they leave out are the important details. One such incident involved a man who tried to CAR JACK a white female police officer. He caught her by surprise and managed to knock her aside and tried to strangle her. She managed to grab her gun and shot him dead. How did the press report it? “White cop kills black man.” Fred Reed, who has traveled with police of all colors for many years, has far too many stories just like this one. I don’t like conspiratorial thinking but this subject makes me reach for my tin-foil hat.

    [Where’s the conspiracy? You mentioned plain facts. Links would be appreciated.]

Comments are closed.