print“With a sectarian power-sharing agreement and interfering neighbours, Iraq is looking a lot like Lebanon,” writes Lamis Andoni at Al Jazeera.
Where else? Now that the Left is as invested in all Obama’s wars as the “Right,” sober assessment of regions made more backward and benighted for our interventions is hard to come by in American media. There is nothing new about the silence of collaborators in this country, Left and Right.
“The power-sharing framework agreed in Iraq has so far failed to end the eight month deadlock over the structure of a new cabinet. The stalemate, due to haggling over key posts, is reflective of how post-invasion Iraq has succumbed to ethnic and sectarian rivalry, which, in turn, has further obstructed its economic and political recovery. It is also indicative of how the country has become a playground for different regional and international powers who are competing for influence and the country’s oil resources.”
The agreement reached earlier this month would allow Nuri al-Maliki, the incumbent prime minister, to form a new government – even though the Iraqiya coalition took two more seats than his State of Law alliance in the parliamentary elections.
The accord would establish a Lebanon-style sectarian and ethnic formula – which might prove to be more of a recipe for constant instability than a guarantor of national reconciliation. It is ironic that we are witnessing the ‘Lebanonisation’ of Iraq at the exact moment when this type of power-sharing formula may be causing the ‘Iraqisation’ of Lebanon – as many fear that Lebanon is on the verge of inter-sectarian strife. …
Iraq’s emerging political system is a direct product of the US invasion and Iran’s complicity in both the invasion and the ensuing occupation. And Iran has, so far, come out of it with the strongest hand – as the prime minister is the main authoritative power. Neighbouring ‘Sunni’ Arab countries have also played a role in consolidating divisions within Iraq – either by directly helping the US forces or by failing to help Iraq maintain its unity.”
[SNIP]
Where there was once oppression and order, now there is just chaos and daily danger. What always gets me is the terror on the faces of children trying to survive in “liberated” Iraq.
“In a March 2009 meeting with U.S. counterterrorism adviser John Brennan, an ailing Saudi King Abdullah echoed the widely shared Middle Eastern view that “the U.S. invasion handed Iraq to Iran on a silver platter.” Abdullah also dismissed Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki as “an Iranian agent.” “
Source: http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_cables_credibility_question
Another interesting article entitled: “Israel greets WikiLeaks cables as vindication of its Iran policy” is:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1110/wikileaks_israel.php3
George “Decision Points” Bush distorted information to make a case for the Liberation of Iraq. Here is an update:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/15/AR2010111506015.html
And, pathetically enough, most Tea-Party “conservative Republican” types still stick with supporting clownish Bush. Why? Because he cut marginal tax rates on Goldman-Sachs bailout-millionaires from 39% to 35% while spending $1 Trillion further destabilizing the Islamic world?
And as long as Richard Milhous Obama remains black, pro-choice, and gets gays into the military, the left seems content with the continuation of the Global Empire. The cost of this Empire, combined with the Ponzi entitlements (which the Bushite/Republicans enhanced with “prescription drug socialism”) plunges the US deeper into the deficit inflationary funk. And, to top it off, we help manufacture homeless Moslem refugees – tomorrow’s terrorists – with this imperial hubris. Thanks for the LIBERATION, Bush!
Yes, but we gave them democracy! Purple fingers!
Okay, so hundreds of thousands are dead, millions displaced, and infrastructure is in ruins. You have to break a few eggs to make an omelette, right? Ingrates!