printOmitted from the suspects lined-up in my WND column, “Fox News And Its Truth Deniers,” was U.S. Representative for New York’s 15th congressional district, Charlie Rangel. A more repulsive character to make himself at home on the “dueling perspectives political panel” would be hard to come by. A moral vacuum would open up, says Rangel, if the streets are swept clean of the Occupy Wall Street human and other detritus. Rangel apparently thinks that blocking access to the subway and disrupting business, which is what’s afoot, amounts to speech. Is this the opposite of edifying or what?
Edifying or Stupefying?
Business,Economy,Free Speech,Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim,libertarianism,Liberty,Media,Propaganda
Rangel took the seat of the late Representative Adam Clayton Powell Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Clayton_Powell,_Jr.
who was denied seating from Congress for his misdescretions. So he is following in excellent footsteps. Just someone who would fit perfectly into the ANC in your old homeland.
Charlie Rangel has always been an interesting (though in a repulsive manner) character to me. He seems to contain all the bad characteristics of both Republicans and Democrats with none of the virtues of either. The best I can say about him is that at least he is consistent.