Here we go again: Zim’s failure is being reduced by the chattering class to the shenanigans of one man. As I have written, “The peanut gallery’s messiah du jour is Morgan Tsvangirai of the Zimbabwean Opposition Party. They delude themselves that if not for the megalomania of one man—Mugabe—freedom would have flourished in Zimbabwe, as it has in the rest of Africa.”
What bunk!
What western know-nothings never contemplate is “who was the Prince among Men responsible for the good times [in Zimbabwe]? The phantom was Ian Smith, prime minister of Rhodesia, RIP. Smith was ostracized by the international community which refused to recognize his minority rule, and treated him like it treated Saddam Hussein, with boycotts and sanctions.”
“The British would not rest until Smith ceded power. When Mugabe was elected Leader for Life in 1980, he celebrated the West’s stupidity by committing his first major massacre in 1983. While Dr. Robert Mugabe was eliminating 20,000 innocent Ndebele in Matabeleland, his pals in the US were busy bestowing on him honorary doctorates. By the time the Queen of England knighted Sir Robert Mugabe in 1994, he had already done his ‘best’ work.” (Excerpted from “Mugabe, Mbeki, Maliki: They’re Our Boys“)
Thus will South Africa be eulogized with reference to what Mbeki or Zuma did wrong, rather than with reference to the West—it would not relent until that country passed into the hands of a ruthless, voracious majority. No federalism was allowed. No rights for the Afrikaner and English minorities were ever considered. In fact, the US opposed those trifles and agitated for raw democracy.
Now what we have in my former homeland is African democracy as raw and as ripe as sewerage.