Category Archives: Government

Letter of the Week: Short and Sweet

Federalism, Government

In “It’s About Federalism, Stupid!,” I thought I had written a straightforward column, the logic of which every clear-thinking person, whatever his party, would follow. How wrong! I am still incapable of assessing the slavish fealty among my readers for the Republicans and those who “carry the water for them.”

The column is running again on WND over the week-end. Adjacent to it are letters berating—as opposed to debating—me.

E-MAIL TO THE EDITOR
Wanted: Conservative savior
Exclusive: Readers hammer one another, take columnist Ilana Mercer to woodshed
–WND

PLAY IT AGAIN, SAM
Exclusive: Ilana Mercer skewers Rush Limbaugh, calls for adherence to Constitution
All is not lost. Joe, a reader, absolutely gets it. His is BAB’
Continue reading

Updated: Canada: Crap Country

Canada, Government, Taxation

I once wrote on my website that having lived in both countries, I’d take the U.S. anytime over Canada and its Nordic, morose people. After doing time there (seven lean years), I can with comfort compile a composite of the Canadian Character. My inspiration would be the somnambulant, morbid, long-suffering zombies of Ingmar Bergman’s films.

Then I felt guilty and removed the comment. Perhaps it was a little severe. And, after all, hadn’t Canada opposed the invasion of Iraq? That alone warranted a reevaluation of this already-broad generalization.

Yesterday I was reminded of the mind-numbing pettiness that made Canada such a disgusting place to live in the first place (tax rates aside).

I am planning on purchasing a new mattress this week. The old one is a perfectly good, high-quality mattress, bought originally in Canada. I suggested to my daughter (who still resides in that place) that she take it. She’s sleeping on something from which the springs protrude.

She and a friend hired a van and arrived to collect the thing. I was glad knowing that she’d be sleeping on a decent mattress. After a pleasant evening of Ali G. viewing (which is where the apt appellation “crap country” originates), the “kids” headed back to “Soviet Canuckistan” with the neatly wrapped mattress and base and a few other odds and ends (more furniture, but also the stuff mothers give kids who’ve left the nest: anti-cold meds, vitamins, pullovers, socks, and ready, wild rice from Trader Joe’s, which is kind of like Capers, only dirt cheap).

Sometime later we received a frantic call from the border: customs would not allow a used mattress through—one that had originated in Canada—without proof that it had been fumigated (my daughter is asthmatic and would not have been able to sleep on a mattress that had been fouled in this fashion). What’s more, the cretins tried to shake the kids down for money to dump the thing for them. Thieves.

The Used Mattress Materials Regulations are very vague, but the bastards at the border embellished and said that if they did return to the US and came back the following day, they’d better have certified proof from a fumigator.

The only bed bugs (and other vermin) that ever came close to that mattress set were those customs creeps.

P.S. Please spare me the somber (Canadian) “don’t-generalize” comments. I know a few wonderful Canadians (okay two, maybe three). But had we known it was such a socialist dump —an honorary member of the Third World is how the Wall Street Journal described it—and that we’d be clipping coupons for our first three years there and living in a complex infested with Iranian gangs—we’d have come on straight to the States. Oh, and my husband was in the top 10% of earners in Canada. Yep, that’s as good as it gets for highly-skilled newcomers. Gotta keep the gap between taxpayers and tax consumers as narrow as possible.

Update: I’m rather proud to report that despite the stress endured by the border bullies—and the fury of not being able to keep her property—my daughter and her friend still found the composure to look up a charity in the nearest US town, drive there, and donate the mattress. That’s far better than letting the bureaucratic bandits steal it.

Updated: Remember Reno!

America, Criminal Injustice, Government, Justice, Law

“Back in the day, the law was intended as a bulwark against government abuses. It has now become an implement of government, to be utilized by all-knowing rulers for the “greater good”—the founders’ Blackstonian view of the law has been supplanted by a Benthamism that encourages ambitious prosecutors to discard a defendant’s rights. Add the aggravating circumstances of a highly militarized federal law enforcement that shares the judiciary’s contempt for the Rights of Englishmen, and is abetted by a public dimmed by statist schools and media—and one has a recipe for disaster. A mouthful maybe, but something to ponder as another prosecutorial team gathers steam, this time in Utah, where the state, feds in tow, has been pursuing Warren Jeffs, leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints…”

The excerpt is from this week’s WND column, “Remember Reno!.” Comments are Welcome.

Update: Quite a few conservative, as opposed libertarian, readers wrote in to lambaste me for what they perceived as my taking up the cause of Warren Jeffs, the polygamist. Some embellished by asserting—no evidence was provided—that Jeffs, in addition to servicing all those wives of his, also sodomized many boys. But most egregious, as one reader contended, was Jeffs’ reputation for not liking blacks and their music. “This makes him extra evil,” my reader complained.

Let me be clear: I don’t take up causes; I try my best to work from principle and fact to arrive at the truth. I know; anathema in our partisan, fiction-based society.
None of the aforementioned accusations are in the indictment. Hating blacks or Jews is no crime, either—at least not in a free society, something conservatives are doing their utmost to sunder.
My points in the column, I believe, were exactly right in that they addressed evidence; not fiction or hearsay—the same stuff upon which the sexual abuse contagion was based in the 1980s (also elaborated on in “Remember Reno!”).
Since we have moved to being a fiction rather than a fact-based society, my readers’ positions don’t surprise.

Letter of the Week: Prosecutors on the Make

America, Free Speech, Government, IMMIGRATION, Individual Rights, Religion

James Huggins writes:

David Koresh was living in peace and bothering nobody, as I recall. That family up on Ruby Ridge in Idaho was living in peace and bothering nobody. Richard Jewell down in Atlanta was living in peace and bothering nobody. What do they, and no doubt many others, have in common? They were all a little weird and a lot “different.” Therefore, all were fair game for media assassination and perfect targets for ambitious prosecutors and federal officers.

Remember, prosecutors are politicians and are usually using their jobs as stepping stones to higher elected office. Ranking police officers are political hacks who owe their jobs to politician bosses. People who are not perceived positively by the public, such as white supremacists, religious fanatics, good ol boy rednecks, or rich white boy college students in a black town are perfect grist as these elected swine grind their way upward to better things. The only trouble is that it is not against the law to be a white supremacist, religious fanatic, good ol boy redneck or a rich white boy. Aren’t they protected by the constitution just like your average Muslim Jihadist or illegal Mexican migrant?

I don’t know too much about Mr. Jeffs. I am against polygamy and against older men having their way with young girls. But, in this day and time I would have to look long and hard at the evidence before automatically condemning any person on the say-so of a prosecutor.

As far as the Muslims are concerned, if they are practicing polygamy in this country, I’m sure they won’t be hindered. The big mistake these fundamentalist Mormons made was not publicly supporting Al-Qaeda and actively demonstrating for open borders with Mexico.

—James Huggins

Further reading: “Mad Dog’ Sneddon Vs. Michael Jackson” And “Patricide & Prosecutorial Misconduct