Update II: Wear A Turban, Not A Tux (Transparency)

Barack Obama,Celebrity,China,Democrats,Foreign Policy,Government

            

Wikipedia: “A state dinner is a dinner or banquet paid by a government [read: taxpayers] and hosted by a head of state in his or her official residence in order to renew and celebrate diplomatic ties between the host country and the country of a foreign head of state or head of government who was issued an invitation.”

In the tradition of celebrating “crap countries” (Ali G. vernacular), BO’s first state dinner is in honor of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Why not? One of BO’s first major addresses as president was delivered in “Egypt’s capital, early in June. There, the president prostrated himself before the Muslim world, offering up prolix praise for the religion of peace.”

President Bush hosted a glittery gala for the same Singh only four years ago.

You the taxpayer most certainly cannot press your nose against the White House windows to get a glimpse of the well-fed, celebrity guests. You’ll have to be content to read about them HERE.

To give credit where its due, when asked “about the tense relationship between India and Pakistan,” Obama said “it was not the role of the United States to intervene and solve such problems.”

That’s all well and good, but then what is he doing beefing up American presence in Afghanistan?

Update I: On the other hand, here’s the neoconservative foreign-policy perspective on Indian-American bond from The Heritage Foundation, chief of which is “the Indo-Pakistani regional rivalry,” terrorism, and, of course, an acknowledgment of the Chinese threat:

“President Obama rightly took advantage of an opportunity to reaffirm ties to India and recognize the U.S.-India partnership as one of the “defining partnerships of the 21st century.” The two countries now need to follow through on their leaders’ pronouncements on a range of issues including education, trade, health, energy, defense, nuclear nonproliferation, space, and the environment.” …

“President Obama hopefully took the opportunity in his private meeting with Singh to provide reassurances that the U.S. is attuned to Indian strategic concerns vis-à-vis China, particularly their ongoing border disputes and Chinese efforts to extend its influence into South Asia. Over the last three years, China has increasingly pressured India over their disputed borders by questioning Indian sovereignty over the state of Arunachal Pradesh and by stepping up probing operations along different parts of their shared frontier.”

Update II (Nov. 25): Transparency. Don’t expect it. Yesterday, the adoring sycophants at CNN—in particular, Anderson Cooper’s fittingly dim sidekick—were salivating for footage from BO’s party, only to be told by a fawning colleague that the administration was not allowing the press to take pics of the prez and his party. Feasts and festivities amid hunger and hardship across the country don’t make for the best optics.

2 thoughts on “Update II: Wear A Turban, Not A Tux (Transparency)

  1. Myron Pauli

    It’s great that the Heritage Foundation is chasing after those warmongering, aggressive Chinese. Here is what Premier Wen Jiabao said about Chinese foreign policy “China pursues the independent foreign policy of peace and will not align with any country or country blocks”

    Source: http:// news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-11/18/content_12485458.htm

    Another leader, Wah Shi Ng Tong, said “Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all.” Oops, I meant Washington:

    http:// avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp

    Another Red Chinese-style aggressor, Thomas Jefferson, said in his first inaugural address: “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none”

    http:// http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres16.htm

    To the Heritage Foundation, a peaceful nation is one which stations troops in over 100 countries – 400,000 Americans stationed overseas according its own website:

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/troopsdb.cfm

    How many Chinese troops are stomping around outside China????

    More from Washington:

    “As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible, avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace…. avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertion in time of peace to discharge the debts which UNAVOIDABLE WARS may have occasioned”

  2. Mari Tyers

    BO could have picked a crappier country. As part of the BRIC countries, India will most likely play a larger role in the world economy. While there were others I think he should have picked instead, I don’t think that India was a horrible choice.

    The Heritage Foundation is right to place emphasis on Sino-Indian relations, but they picked all the wrong reasons. Keeping the Sino-Indian relationship cordial is in the best interest of both countries, as well as America. In the case of a conflict between the two, Pakistan will benefit the most from the regional instability, followed by the Uighur population in Xinjian. Instead of sinophobia, the Indian government seek out areas of mutual collaboration with the Chinese government.

Comments are closed.