printThe arrest of 19-year-old Mohamed Osman Mohamud, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Somalia, for planning to set off a bomb in Portland, Oregon, smacks of FBI entrapment; the FBI is notorious for the wickedly smart traps it lays for slow youth (such as the Miami Seven).
Even if the FBI has narrowly avoided the legal definition of entrapment in MOM’s case, it is rather ludicrous to hear media megaphones mouthing the mantra about this arrest providing proof, once again, that “they are out to get us.” Yes, it proves your government is out to get you—with its immigration policies.
Who let this guy in?
No one is saying—and the matter will remain submerged. Not even Google will give up MOM’s “immigration success story,” but you and I know that his folks are not plucky H-1B or O-1 visa holders. They’re probably visa lottery winners or refugees.
I had just blogged about the revocation of Brandon Huntley’s refugee status by the Canadian Court, which was “guided” by the Canadian Immigration Department, which, in turn, took orders from South Africa’s ANC goons. The latter oleaginous officials were backed by legions of house-trained liberals. “133 academics from 13 South African and 6 overseas universities,” all united to rob a man of a bit of luck; of some mercy.
What cowards!
Huntley is a South African (of the WASP variety).
In the Comments Section, another white South African gloated. Huntley had it coming. He isn’t a very nice guy. This is indeed the liberal mindset. The white, liberal man (even when he calls himself a “conservative”) is a deracinated creature, completely without the ability to see the bigger picture that is the South African reality.
It was argued that the Canadian government would have been “deluged by South African asylum seekers jumping at the chance to get into a country they wouldn’t otherwise have a prayer of getting into.”
Our reader never asks himself why it is that Canada and the US routinely reject (even deport) South African WASP immigrants, who are known for their wicked work ethic, happen to share the same ancestors and faith, and do not harbor Jihadi ambitions.
You are more likely to come upon a Mohamed Osman Mohamud in an American suburb than bump into a van der Merwe, in other words, a South African homie. But the liberal mindset (prevalent among most conservatives) forbids such inquisitiveness. Doesn’t occur …
Yes, Brandon Huntley was denied that meager thing called mercy because he acted like a bit of a blowhard, says one white bloke.
Yes, if Brandon had only been sepia tinged and harbored ambitions to blow things up, he’d have been a citizen of Canada or the USA already.
UPDATE: HORRIBLE HABITS (MORE LIKE TRADITIONS). It’s hard to make out if VDARE or someone else is the origin of the following: “Somalis are singularly unfit for life in North America, even if they remain (more or less) non-violent.” The hyperlinks lead here: “Somali Mom Asphyxiates Two Kids in Closet.”
And HERE: “Green Bay’s Dis-Americanization Proceeding Nicely.”
And HERE: Somalis “are unassimilated Muslims who follow violent sharia law, practice polygamy and slice off the private parts of their little girls (aka FGM, with a prevalence of 98% in Somalia).”
[SNIP]
So why are 85,000 Somali immigrants a good thing, but a “deluge” of WASP South Africans cannot be countenanced or coped with? Afraid the latter will work too hard for their money? Don’t we need more productive individuals in order to support all those Somalis?
After visiting Mogadishu in 1993, I am skeptical that the status would be anything other than a refugee status. Although there were some that were English-speaking, the cultural and commercial districts were essentially in ruins-riddled with artillery damage. Something that would not lend to the thought that there were many educated Somalis remaining in country.
This Canadian citizen can all too easily understand why Mr.Huntley got turned down. To admit that there is systematic, government-tolerated persecution of whites AS A GROUP in SA would bring down the whole edifice of Mandela-worship that so many people help build. Can’t do that, not here, not now. But people’s views are shifting, at least those expressed outside of Canadian mainstream media. There is hope.
Western society has an auto-immune disorder.
As I’ve mentioned before, if we opened the floodgates to Boer and Cape British immigration, they’d come here en masse. Interestingly, I just read this one today: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/11/27/study-south-african-men-admit-committing-rape/?cmpid=prn_baynote-js_Study_One_in_Three_South_African_Men_Admit_to_Committing_Rape#
Americans and Canadians are fools. I wish I had a deeper observation on the subject but I’m afraid that “fools” pretty well covers it.
My comments had nothing to do with my “being completely without the ability to see the bigger picture that is the South African reality” (read one of my posts in which you, Ms Mercer, feature predominantly). I was remarking on the reasons for Huntley’s overturned refugee status, period, not seeking to malign the man. Referring to him as a bit of a chancer is not synonymous with calling him “not a very nice guy”. On television Huntley comes over as being a very nice guy indeed.
I simply believe the appeal court ruled correctly under the circumstances. He destroyed his case when he admitted that he had come to Canada to find work, which he had been unable to in South Africa (as opposed to only wanting to escape physical persecution).
Huntley had it all done and dusted until he chose to go public. My point was that had he stayed below the radar none of this would have happened. The ANC wouldn’t have known or cared less if it had, and ditto for the Canadian government.
From the above posted link:
“Jewkes believes South Africa’s history of racial division and associated trauma is part of the reason of the high incidence of sexual violence in the country.
“Apartheid has contributed to culture of impunity surrounding rape in South Africa,” said Jewkes. Men who were abused or experienced trauma during their childhood are much more likely to rape, she said, adding that apartheid destroyed family life, fostering violence and anti-social behavior.”
I suppose this explains why the rest of the African continent is such a virtual paradise.
Dan