“To claim you correspond with an al-Qaida recruiter for purposes of ‘research’ is like saying you read Playboy magazine for the articles.”
“The jihadi who committed fratricide at Fort Hood would never have advanced such fatuities. Leave such deception to the nation’s military and intelligence establishment: Last December, no less than two Joint Terrorism Task Forces finessed Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s extensive correspondence with the infamous radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki as an innocent exchange.”
“The Muslim-American who (‘allegedly’) murdered 13 people and maimed 31 on a United States Army post had been straightforward about his sympathies throughout his military career.”
“Honest Hasan took every opportunity to inform his colleagues and classmates that he was a Muslim first, an American and an officer second, and that Islamic law usurped the Constitution. That minor tidbit failed to rattle the military.” …
The case of Major Nidal Malik Hasan demonstrates that little has changed since the “the lachrymose (or should I say lachrymoose) Chief Charles Moose of Montgomery County” refused to consider African-American Muslims as suspects in his lackluster search for the DC snipers.
From “HONK AN APOLOGY FOR HONKY”: “They pursued the police tenaciously. They called in with tips about the murders. They even postponed scheduled executions in order to try and pierce Chief Charles Moose’s resistant mindset. ‘Check out Montgomery,’ they counseled. When a mere mention of ‘Montgomery’ failed to get Moose’s antlers moving in the right direction, well, they spent a dime on another call, this time providing explicit directions to the Alabama local. Silly snipers; not knowing that homeless Africans are a protected species, they loitered in parking lots in their Chevy Caprice, hoping to get noticed, and all but flagged down a police car. Hell, they even penned their notes in Ebonics.”
“The serial slayers went beyond the call of duty in trying to get caught; Chief Moose, on the other hand, did his best to adhere to the Look Away Doctrine, now imperiling American lives.”
[SNIP]
The same Doctrine continues to imperil American lives.
John A. Muhammad, one of the snipers, is scheduled to be executed tomorrow, Tuesday, for assassinating ten people and critically injured three others. Major Nidal—he murdered 13 Americans—will have to wait his turn.
The young thug flexing his Muslim muscle in this YouTube clip on the streets of London should not be the object of your contempt. He is true to himself. The society that hothouses this vile creature with his veiled threats to snuff out the life of anti-Islam activist Geert Wilders—that country deserves your scorn.
Today that self-immolating society is Britain; tomorrow it’ll be the US. We’re nearly there.
In the hoodlum’s words (via Brenda Walker of VDARE.COM):
We’re here to protest against this man, Geert Wilders, who insulted the message of Mohamed, [blah blah aleikum Islam]. We’re here to give him a message that, like he’s doing his interview today holed up, he’ll remain holed up, because he obviously knows that in Islam, the punishment for the one who insults the prophet is capital punishment. And he should take lessons from people like Theo Van Gogh and others who faced the punishment. So obviously we’re here to warn him and remind him that he’s going to remain holed up as long as he insults Islam and Muslims.
Interviewer: Is that going to be construed a threat, what you just said?
Well, obviously I’m saying, I’m not saying that I’m personally am going to carry out, but, he needs to know that there are Muslims in every corner of the earth, and these people they all have the love for the message of Mohamed [blah blah aleikum Islam]. And in the message of Mohamed he said, ‘the one who insults any of the prophets, kill him.’ That is a capital punishment. Not necessarily that personally I’m going to carry it out, but he should be warned that, you know, of the consequences of it.” [VDARE.COM note: Transcript here, the “blah blah” being the transcriber’s substitute for whatever the fellow is saying when he’s not speaking English.] [ilana’s note: he’s blessing the “prophet.”]
This phenomenon is disturbing for what it says of Britain’s dhimmi culture; not about the bum who should be deportedto a sandy place. Speaking and publishing under the threat of injury or death: this is one of the defining libertarian issues of our times. A society that allows into its midst a sizable contingent whose members, as a matter of creed, threaten to kill countrymen guilty of speech they deem offensive—that society is sick. It will not survive.
The young thug flexing his Muslim muscle in this YouTube clip on the streets of London should not be the object of your contempt. He is true to himself. The society that hothouses this vile creature with his veiled threats to snuff out the life of anti-Islam activist Geert Wilders—that country deserves your scorn.
Today that self-immolating society is Britain; tomorrow it’ll be the US. We’re nearly there.
In the hoodlum’s words (via Brenda Walker of VDARE.COM):
We’re here to protest against this man, Geert Wilders, who insulted the message of Mohamed, [blah blah aleikum Islam]. We’re here to give him a message that, like he’s doing his interview today holed up, he’ll remain holed up, because he obviously knows that in Islam, the punishment for the one who insults the prophet is capital punishment. And he should take lessons from people like Theo Van Gogh and others who faced the punishment. So obviously we’re here to warn him and remind him that he’s going to remain holed up as long as he insults Islam and Muslims.
Interviewer: Is that going to be construed a threat, what you just said?
Well, obviously I’m saying, I’m not saying that I’m personally am going to carry out, but, he needs to know that there are Muslims in every corner of the earth, and these people they all have the love for the message of Mohamed [blah blah aleikum Islam]. And in the message of Mohamed he said, ‘the one who insults any of the prophets, kill him.’ That is a capital punishment. Not necessarily that personally I’m going to carry it out, but he should be warned that, you know, of the consequences of it.” [VDARE.COM note: Transcript here, the “blah blah” being the transcriber’s substitute for whatever the fellow is saying when he’s not speaking English.] [ilana’s note: he’s blessing the “prophet.”]
This phenomenon is disturbing for what it says of Britain’s dhimmi culture; not about the bum who should be deportedto a sandy place. Speaking and publishing under the threat of injury or death: this is one of the defining libertarian issues of our times. A society that allows into its midst a sizable contingent whose members, as a matter of creed, threaten to kill countrymen guilty of speech they deem offensive—that society is sick. It will not survive.
