When Will Hussein Obama Condemn White Hot Hatred Of Whites?

Barack Obama, Crime, GUNS, Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim, Military, Pseudoscience, Psychiatry, Race, Racism

The banal, near-comatose brains at MSNBC have been calling for the usual “national conversation,” crafted by their ilk, naturally, about gun violence, the stymieing of research into gun violence (come again?!), Texas-style open carry, too many wars and military deployment—all said to have pushed tender soul Micah Xavier Johnson over the edge, causing him and his brothers to “shoot a dozen Dallas police officers, killing five” (7/7/016).

In the vernacular of liberalism (embraced by conservatives), evil is never committed, but only ever caused.

Can we, oh Delphic Oracles of stupidity and political tyranny, talk about the white hot hatred of whites and the West that appears to underpin this president’s words and actions and those of his lauded Black Lives matter movementarians? (See: “Dallas suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.”)

Of course not. Move on, peons. Nothing here to see.
UPDATED: Facebook discussion.


I asked yesterday:

Bernie Must Be Feeling Extra Foolish

Democrats, Elections, Hillary Clinton

“You’ve got a situation here where the woman [Hillary Clinton] who would be in charge of setting national security policy as president has been deemed by the F.B.I. unsuitable to safeguard and handle classified information.”—Washington lawyer specializing in security clearances, New York Times:

Though Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch formally affirmed on Wednesday that the Justice Department would not seek criminal charges against anyone in the email case, fallout from the matter is sure to affect several dozen State Department advisers who, records show, facilitated Mrs. Clinton’s unorthodox email arrangement or used it to send her classified documents.
Among those drawing the most intense scrutiny are Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, onetime aides who could face difficult questions in pursuing security clearances for diplomatic or national security posts because of their involvement with Mrs. Clinton’s emails. (… MORE)

Even the NYT can no longer ignore Clinton’s stupid conduct. I bet Bernie Sanders is feeling like an even bigger fool than he is for papering over his rival’s rotten judgment.

“In the first Democratic debate, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said people are sick of hearing about Hillary Clinton’s ‘damn emails.” Sanders might have had a chance against the Clinton Machine had he driven home the “bad judgment” point. Instead, he spent the primaries obsequiously apologizing to her highness like the mouse he is.

Let’s Have Leniency For Ordinary Americans Imprisoned By The Security State

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Homeland Security

The good news is that Hillary Clinton is finished as a presidential candidate (unless I’ve failed to factor in the voting power of the resentful minorities that flank her and Barack Obama on their campaign excursions). The more like a banana republic the American political and justice systems show themselves to be—the greater Donald Trump’s chances of becoming president.

Again and again has FBI Director James Comey, “an Obama appointee who served in the Bush DOJ” (and who used to get his best daily boosting from Sean Hannity), revealed himself as a weasel. As recent events have demonstrated, Comey has an abysmal record of stopping American Jihadists, but has vigorously prosecuted innocents (in natural law) such as Martha Stewart.

“Washington Has Been Obsessed With Punishing Secrecy Violations — until Hillary Clinton,” writes Glenn Greenwald, in this characteristically excellent analysis:

Secrecy is a virtual religion in Washington. Those who violate its dogma have been punished in the harshest and most excessive manner – at least when they possess little political power or influence. As has been widely noted, the Obama administration has prosecuted more leakers under the 1917 Espionage Act than all prior administrations combined. Secrecy in DC is so revered that even the most banal documents are reflexively marked classified, making their disclosure or mishandling a felony. As former CIA and NSA Director Michael Hayden said back in 2000, “Everything’s secret. I mean, I got an email saying ‘Merry Christmas.’ It carried a top secret NSA classification marking.”

People who leak to media outlets for the selfless purpose of informing the public – Daniel Ellsberg, Tom Drake, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden – face decades in prison. Those who leak for more ignoble and self-serving ends – such as enabling hagiography (Leon Panetta, David Petreaus) or ingratiating oneself to one’s mistress (Petraeus) – face career destruction, though they are usually spared if they are sufficiently Important-in-DC. For low-level, powerless Nobodies-in-DC, even the mere mishandling of classified information – without any intent to leak but merely to, say, work from home – has resulted in criminal prosecution, career destruction and the permanent loss of security clearance.

This extreme, unforgiving, unreasonable, excessive posture toward classified information came to an instant halt in Washington today – just in time to save Hillary Clinton’s presidential aspirations. FBI Director James Comey, an Obama appointee who served in the Bush DOJ, held a press conference earlier this afternoon in which he condemned Clinton on the ground that she and her colleagues were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” including Top Secret material.

Comey also detailed that her key public statements defending her conduct – i.e., she never sent classified information over her personal email account and that she had turned over all “work-related” emails to the State Department – were utterly false; insisted “that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position . . . should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation”; and argued that she endangered national security because of the possibility “that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.” Comey also noted that others who have done what Clinton did “are often subject to security or administrative sanctions” – such as demotion, career harm, or loss of security clearance.

Despite all of these highly incriminating findings, Comey explained, the FBI is recommending to the Justice Department that Clinton not be charged with any crime. “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” he said, “our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” To justify this claim, Comey cited “the context of a person’s actions” and her “intent.” In other words, there is evidence that she did exactly what the criminal law prohibits, but it was more negligent and careless than malicious and deliberate. …

.… MORE.