Category Archives: History

'Yes, Columbus Discovered America'

America, Colonialism, Education, History, Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim, Propaganda

Indigenous Indians protesting Columbus Day are not nearly as ridiculous as native Americans teaching and imbibing a great deal of tripe about Christopher Columbus. And no one puts it quite like David Yeagley, the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle:

“…it is the greatness of Columbus that liberals cannot abide. Being the pathological protesters they are, no great achiever is allowed recognition. (Liberals laud only empty words of people like Barry Soetoro.) And that which the world has previously considered great and honorable must now be denigrated, demeaned, and condemned. Indeed, damned as evil and wrong.

That’s what Jeffrey Kolowith is teaching his kindergarten students in Tampa, Florida. They mustn’t like Columbus. He was bad. ‘He was very, very mean, very bossy,’ says Kolowith, poisoning the little children’s minds with disdain, aversion, and hatred for the very elements of character required to achieve anything grand. Self-discipline, group management, unrelenting dedication, these are not to be found in the weak and ‘loving’ liberal. The only thing they’re devoted to is undoing what achievers achieve.

An AP story, “A darker side of Columbus” emerges in US classrooms, indicates Kolowith is determined that children despise those who have accomplished the most significant feats in history.

Author of the article, Christine Amario, has assembled a sordid array of typical, boring anti-American brainwashers. The only one distinguished among them is in fact Mr. Kolowith—and only because he’s taken the anti-Western cause to the youngest children in the American public school system: the five-year olds.

The irony of an author with an Italian name, trying to discredit the greatest Italian since the time of Jesus! Self-purgation, is it? ‘Abbe pietá di me!’ (Have mercy on me!) This is the liberal’s idea of nobility: self-loathing.”

Read “Yes, Columbus Discovered America.” (As well as the the interview Dr. Yeagley conducted with me.)

China At Sixty

Capitalism, China, Communism, History

“Assessing China at 60,” by Melissa Chan of Al Jazeera (one of the best news sources, incidentally):

Sixty years after Mao Zedong’s communists took power in Beijing, there are many reasons for China to celebrate.

China today has become the third-largest economy in the world – second, if you measure it by purchasing power parity – and is well on track to cement its place as the world’s foremost economic superpower.

And while it has been exciting to count the numbers of new millionaires – or billionaires – created every year, the country has also managed to pull 500 million of its people out of poverty over the last few decades.

Of course, we also hear much about China’s worsening wealth disparity: Not exactly everyone is sharing in the wealth.

China’s environment has paid a heavy price for economic growth.
And all these economic changes have come at a heavy price for China’s environment, in the form of dead rivers, poisoned land and toxic air.

Then there are the increasingly frequent reports of unrest and rioting. Frightening numbers of people – often in the tens of thousands – with their complaints.

After six decades of communist rule, there is much for the government to worry about.

They need to watch the mass migration of farmers who have deserted their lands to find work in the city.

There is the corruption, which many ordinary Chinese tell us is getting worse, not better.

It is a story of transformation in often too little time. For every miracle or success story, there is a counter example amongst the disenfranchised.

Growing pains

China’s rise is a complex story and often contradictory – a hallmark of the growing pains of this new world power.

The one thing that rose above all the din of contradiction, the one thing most Chinese can all agree on, is that life is better today than in the past.

On the road for our Long March series of reports, retracing a key episode in the communist’s rise to power, this is what the Chinese we met told us.

The founding of the People’s Republic on October 1, 1949 brought an end to a bitter civil war between Mao’s communists and the nationalist Kuomintang, led by Chiang Kai-shek.

The communist’s struggle has become the stuff of lore, particularly the epic Long March. Its importance is still emphasized every day.

Turn on the TV and you will almost always come across a documentary replaying the black and white footage from the 1930s and 40s: The Red Army fighting the Japanese, the Red Army fighting the Kuomintang, communist cadres talking to the people, Mao Zedong speaking to farmers.

But, the documentaries will tell you, there was no greater historic event than the Long March.

Spreading the message

The Chinese call it “the walk that lasted 25,000 li”, that is 12,500 kilometres.

No one can confirm the actual distance of the march, but it did take two years and killed about nine out of 10 participants.

It was a military retreat from their civil war opponents, and by most circumstances would have been considered a defeat.

But it allowed the communists to spread their message across a huge swathe of China, where they won the support of the peasantry – which was, and still is, the largest demographic in the country.

It was on the backs of the farmers then, that Mao’s communists rose to power.

We started our trip in Jiangxi Province where the communists declared the Chinese Soviet.

This was their own republic, their little world where they would experiment with what they had read in books, in theory, and now implement them in real life.

But the communists did not end up spending too much time here. They would abandon their Soviet, routed by the Kuomintang army, so beginning their Long March.

Today, the town of Ruijin is as comparatively quiet as it had been back then.

We stopped by Liang Chong Deng’s family. They have always been here, generation after generation. But now, Liang told us, he is not sure how much longer the family will stay on the land.

His son and daughter, he tells us, are not farmers but work in the city. They would not know how to grow anything if they ever returned to their plot of land.

Our next stop retracing the march was Sichuan province, in China’s southwest.

By the time the Red Army reached here, half the soldiers were gone, from death, desertion or illness.

Much of Sichuan is mountainous, deeply forested and even today access is often difficult.

Years ago, the Red Army soldiers would have gone through on nothing but shoes made of straw, or barefoot, in bedraggled uniforms, hacking their way through unmarked territory.

Today, Sichuan is a major tourist area, widely known as the home of that great Chinese icon, the giant panda.

But it would have been hard for any Red Army soldier to imagine it as a friendly place.

The tribes in the area – Tibetans and a minority group known as the Yi – used to doggedly ambush the line of marchers.

Unrest

Today, Sichuan still has large Yi and Tibetan populations, but the dynamic is a very different one than that from history.

It would be difficult to recognize someone from the Yi minority – they speak Chinese like everyone else. The Tibetans are easier to identify, many of them with their prayer beads.

When Mao set out to defeat the Kuomintang, he said he also hoped to unify the country – and that meant including these so-called ethnic minorities.

Most, like the Yi, have integrated into greater China relatively easily. But the Tibetans, as we saw in the recent outbreaks of unrest, remain deeply disenchanted with Chinese rule.

Other ethnic riots earlier this year in the western region of Xinjiang, home to Muslim Uighurs, revealed that, after 60 years of communist rule, some of the most entrenched obstacles to uniting China’s people remain untackled.

The final stop on our road trip was Yan’an, the resting place for the Red Army – the end of their Long March.

Tourists today swarm the caves where Mao Zedong and other top revolutionaries used to live.

They holed up here for years, rebuilding the army and refinancing their revolution using cash earned from the region’s oil wells.

Today, the area around Yan’an remains an important source of oil to fuel China’s booming economy. Wells are visible everywhere, dotting the brown hills.

At the end of the road, you wonder if the China of today is what the first generation of revolutionaries had in mind and whether they believed that they achieved their vision of utopia back in 1949.

China as it is in 2009 would hardly be recognizable to them.

But what the early revolutionaries would certainly agree with today’s Chinese about, is that China today is a strong and powerful country and one that the rest of the world should take notice of.

B. Hussein In History Wonderland

Africa, Barack Obama, History, Islam, Middle East, Pseudo-history, The West

The following excerpt is from my new, Worldnetdaily.com column, “B. Hussein In History Wonderland”:

“Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak arrived in Washington this week to press flesh with the president. In an interview, Mubarak told PBS television that Barack Obama’s speech had shown him that ‘America is not against Islam.’ …

The address Mubarak was referring to was delivered by a grandiose Obama in Egypt’s capital, early in June. There, the president prostrated himself before the Muslim world, offering up prolix praise for the religion of peace – a tradition that his predecessor established. …

Given the veritable mirage of lies he conjured in Cairo, blaming the decadence of Arab countries on nefarious Western imperialist intervention in the 19th and 20th centuries, B. Hussein’s historical horizons vis-à-vis the Middle East could also do with some broadening.

A good start would be to stop relying on ‘Lawrence of Arabia’s’ homoerotic, ahisotric memoir for the facts.” …

The complete column is “B. Hussein In History Wonderland.”

If you miss the column on WND.COM, you can catch it each Saturday on Taki’s Magazine.

That Oh-So Original Argument From Hitler

Democrats, Fascism, History, Republicans, Socialism, The State

The Argument From Hitler (TAFH) is so tired. Come to think of it, tired is a good word for the Republicans. Funny guy and host of Fox News’ late-night laugh “Red Eye” drives home the ludicrous nature of the TAFH by sealing his Gregalogues thus: “If you don’t agree with me, you’re worse than Hitler.” But then Rush Limbaugh is not smart enough to poke fun at himself. Economically, fascism and socialism are evil twins. The Republicans have more of the first in them; the Democrats more of the last. Both parties are made up of consummate statists. Ultimately Rush’s weary TAFH shuts off a more serious deconstruction of Democratic ideology. In any case, here goes Rush:

“Now what are the similarities between the Democrat Party of today and the Nazi party in Germany? Well, the Nazis were against big business. They hated big business and, of course, we all know that they were opposed to Jewish capitalism. They were insanely, irrationally against pollution. They were for two years mandatory voluntary service to Germany. They had a whole bunch of make-work projects to keep people working one of which was the Autobahn.

They were against cruelty and vivisection of animals but in the radical sense of devaluing human life, they banned smoking. They were totally against that. They were for abortion and euthanasia of the undesirables as we all know and they were for cradle-to-grave nationalized health care. I have always bristled when I hear people claim that conservatism gets close to Naziism. It is liberalism that’s the closest you can get to Naziism and socialism. It’s all bundled up under the socialist banner. There are far more similarities between Nancy Pelosi and Adolf Hitler than between these people showing up at town halls to protest a Hitler-like policy that’s being heralded by a Hitler-like logo.”