I suppose I should write a formal essay, only I’m presently too worn down by the pantomime to think again at any length about our failed departure from the European Union. So here is a comment I placed last night on FaceBook:
John Pate is right. There will be no Brexit. The parliamentary stalemate will continue into January, when everyone will agree to a deferral of the leaving date from March to December.
The stalemate will then continue until everyone “reluctantly” agrees to a new referendum. This time, the Sheeple will vote as told. This is the only likely outcome. No preparations have been made for leaving without a deal. Some degree of chaos is inevitable – inevitable because planned. The only deal on offer is worse than staying in. If asked, I will vote again to leave. But enough will vote to stay.
This is, I confess, a disappointing outcome. On the other hand, it is better than having lost the first referendum. Enough people will know we have been defrauded this time for the Conservative Party to be ripped apart. And that will be a reasonably positive outcome.
Category Archives: Nationhood
UPDATED (2/27/019): Immigration: A Look-Away Issue For Neocons & Lite Libertarians
Argument, IMMIGRATION, Labor, libertarianism, Multiculturalism, Nationhood, Neoconservatism, Race
Michael Medved does the same as does Tim Carney in explaining the dismal situation of the working class. From a tony event, far from the madding working-class, Carney tweets this:
“The working class has lost access to the strong institutions of civil society that are the infrastructure of the good life. That’s my thesis,” states Carney, “to explain immobility, retreat from marriage, and Trump.”
For working-class misery, neoconservatives and lite libertarians blame everything BUT mass immigration, diversity, loss of community and sense of place. Anything but the truth.
That’s my thesis.
Marriage has declined faster among the working class (HS degree, no college; 30th-50th income %ile) than any other group, according to Tamar Jacoby.
— Tim Carney (@TPCarney) November 29, 2018
Not pictured: the struggling people in West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin who have no hope for the future and are dying in staggering rates due to opioid overdoses. https://t.co/huGgVsm9Hm
— Mr Moderate (@minofmod) October 21, 2018
Conservatives engage in WhatAboutism:
I call it conservative WhatAboutism. Ann Coulter rips asunder the conservative media's silly, 'but but, Obama did it, and nobody cared' arguments. She gets to the nub of it: No Wall. No moratorium. No end to mass immigration. No America, @anntensity. https://t.co/hrPo143Aas
— ILANA Mercer (@IlanaMercer) November 29, 2018
#AnnCoulter: 'Trump thinks he needs preapproval of Congress, the ACLU & a district court judge in Hawaii to do something about tens of thousands of Americans being killed every year by illegal alien heroin dealers, drunk drivers and straight-up murderers' https://t.co/hrPo143Aas
— ILANA Mercer (@IlanaMercer) November 29, 2018
Thanks, Patriot @AnnCoulter, for exposing that #Trump bombed Syria b/c #Ivanka cried & that POTUS relies on 'constitutional law scholar' Jared for Wall & immigration advice. Deplorables betrayed, @anntensity. https://t.co/hrPo143Aas
— ILANA Mercer (@IlanaMercer) November 29, 2018
Mass immigration, indeed, @USVeteran2, cannot be ignored as a factor. Did the Hillbilly book or this latest admit as much? https://t.co/K1viLkRpaL
— ILANA Mercer (@IlanaMercer) February 26, 2019
UPDATE II (12/15/018): Ambassador Richard Grenell Sets The Immigration Debate Back On Tucker’s Show
Conservatism, Europe, Homeland Security, IMMIGRATION, Nationhood
There wasn’t a plan. There was no Plan. It wasn’t implemented with a Plan.
Over and over did U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell repeat those words, on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show. His goal was clearly to reinforce the long-held safe position on immigration into the West. So long as it’s legal and there’s A Plan, it’s all good.
The only problem Grenell sees with Angela Merkel’s opening Germany to the influx of 1 million Muslims from North Africa and the Middle East was that … there was no plan, whatever that means. The implication: were there a plan, whatever that means, there would be no issue.
But there was A Plan. The Plan was to import 1 million Muslims and teach the German people about values à la Brussels.
Richard Grenell, no different to Rush Limbaugh, in his stated opinion about immigration, has a plan to stay on the side of the angels. Continue to support the influx of 2 million immigrants into the US, annually, since they are legal. Legal immigration will not change the country in bad ways; only the illegal variety does this.
Yes, that’s an unbelievably dumb position. I know.
The exclusive emphasis on border security and legality in the immigration debate is the conservative scoundrel’s bid for respectability.
Open-border advocates are helped immeasurably by the Grenells of this world. Everyone (and his dog) currently concurs that we have no problem with legal immigration, only with the illegal variety. It’s now mandatory to pair an objection to the invasion of the American Southwest with an embrace of all forms of legal immigration. The sole emphasis on border security has, in all likelihood, entrenched the status quo. Americans will never assert their right to determine the nature of the country they live in and, by extension, the kind of immigrants they welcome. The security risk newcomers pose and The Plan to absorb them are the only permissible topics for conversation.
You have to have a Plan, a heart, remain open to lots of immigrants. So long as they’re legal. That’s the safe position.
Tucker Carlson’s position, when he sticks to it, has been that a country is allowed to determine who lives in it and whether it needs a break from the incessant influx because, hey, diversity is killing us as a people.
Read my “Disunited States Of America … “
UPDATE I:
How does Grenell propose to deal with the hate crimes against little German children at school, from aggressive, empowered Arab kids, whose culture is comfortable with such displays of power? What’s the Plan?
UPDATE II (12/15/018): Dave Rubin, really?
Time to switch #Tucker off. His producer has #DaveRubin on. Again. The man has not many original thoughts in his head. Interchangeable with other, standard issue, left-leaning Republicans or right-leaning Democrats. Today's Rubin white noise: #FreeSpeech good. America's great.
— Ilana Mercer (@IlanaMercer) December 13, 2018
Caravanners Are Suing Trump. Apparently, America’s Constitution Was Written For The World
Constitution, Crime, Criminal Injustice, Donald Trump, IMMIGRATION, Law, Nationhood, Race
If the following reality is not proof we Americans don’t have a country, I don’t know what is. If caravaners can sue Americans; Americans don’t have a country.
“Migrant caravan members sue Trump over proposed border policies.” Read:
Central American migrants who are part of the caravan traveling toward the U.S.-Mexico border have filed a class action lawsuit against President Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other members of the administration.
In the lawsuit filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, six Honduran migrants and their children argue that Trump cannot legally stop them from seeking asylum in the United States.
The migrants allege that Trump and his administration are violating the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits the federal government from denying anyone life, liberty or property without due process of law.
If these scofflaws are given standing to bring such a lawsuit in an American court, know that the birthright of Americans has been frittered away by treacherous elites.
Related: “The Caravans Cometh, Making America Great No More.”