Updated: Canada: Crap Country

Canada, Government, Taxation

I once wrote on my website that having lived in both countries, I’d take the U.S. anytime over Canada and its Nordic, morose people. After doing time there (seven lean years), I can with comfort compile a composite of the Canadian Character. My inspiration would be the somnambulant, morbid, long-suffering zombies of Ingmar Bergman’s films.

Then I felt guilty and removed the comment. Perhaps it was a little severe. And, after all, hadn’t Canada opposed the invasion of Iraq? That alone warranted a reevaluation of this already-broad generalization.

Yesterday I was reminded of the mind-numbing pettiness that made Canada such a disgusting place to live in the first place (tax rates aside).

I am planning on purchasing a new mattress this week. The old one is a perfectly good, high-quality mattress, bought originally in Canada. I suggested to my daughter (who still resides in that place) that she take it. She’s sleeping on something from which the springs protrude.

She and a friend hired a van and arrived to collect the thing. I was glad knowing that she’d be sleeping on a decent mattress. After a pleasant evening of Ali G. viewing (which is where the apt appellation “crap country” originates), the “kids” headed back to “Soviet Canuckistan” with the neatly wrapped mattress and base and a few other odds and ends (more furniture, but also the stuff mothers give kids who’ve left the nest: anti-cold meds, vitamins, pullovers, socks, and ready, wild rice from Trader Joe’s, which is kind of like Capers, only dirt cheap).

Sometime later we received a frantic call from the border: customs would not allow a used mattress through—one that had originated in Canada—without proof that it had been fumigated (my daughter is asthmatic and would not have been able to sleep on a mattress that had been fouled in this fashion). What’s more, the cretins tried to shake the kids down for money to dump the thing for them. Thieves.

The Used Mattress Materials Regulations are very vague, but the bastards at the border embellished and said that if they did return to the US and came back the following day, they’d better have certified proof from a fumigator.

The only bed bugs (and other vermin) that ever came close to that mattress set were those customs creeps.

P.S. Please spare me the somber (Canadian) “don’t-generalize” comments. I know a few wonderful Canadians (okay two, maybe three). But had we known it was such a socialist dump —an honorary member of the Third World is how the Wall Street Journal described it—and that we’d be clipping coupons for our first three years there and living in a complex infested with Iranian gangs—we’d have come on straight to the States. Oh, and my husband was in the top 10% of earners in Canada. Yep, that’s as good as it gets for highly-skilled newcomers. Gotta keep the gap between taxpayers and tax consumers as narrow as possible.

Update: I’m rather proud to report that despite the stress endured by the border bullies—and the fury of not being able to keep her property—my daughter and her friend still found the composure to look up a charity in the nearest US town, drive there, and donate the mattress. That’s far better than letting the bureaucratic bandits steal it.

Fox & Friend: Prince Al-Waleed

Islam

Over the weekend, Fox News ventured into the “Is Islam Peaceful? Sure it is” carefully crafted conversation (or shall I say consensus). They invited Dennis Ross and Steven Emerson to comment. The last was better than the first, but neither, as far as I know, is a scholar of Islam.

That’s when Robert Spencer ought to have been brought in, but wasn’t—seldom is. Spencer is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), which is still a bestseller a year since its publication. His latest literary hole-in-one is The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion. It’s 63rd on Amazon. Both are courageous, path-breaking works.

As to why Fox has not consulted a genuine expert on Islam about its teachings, well, maybe their part-owner, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, has “counseled” against it.

Fox & Friend: Prince Al-Waleed

Islam

Over the weekend, Fox News ventured into the “Is Islam Peaceful? Sure it is” carefully crafted conversation (or shall I say consensus). They invited Dennis Ross and Steven Emerson to comment. The last was better than the first, but neither, as far as I know, is a scholar of Islam.

That’s when Robert Spencer ought to have been brought in, but wasn’t—seldom is. Spencer is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), which is still a bestseller a year since its publication. His latest literary hole-in-one is The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion. It’s 63rd on Amazon. Both are courageous, path-breaking works.

As to why Fox has not consulted a genuine expert on Islam about its teachings, well, maybe their part-owner, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, has “counseled” against it.

Limbaugh Climbs Into a Cripple

Hollywood, Media, The Zeitgeist

Rush Limbaugh’s sneering assault on Michael J. Fox’s affliction was utterly depraved. A human being with a head and a heart would have stuck to the issue, rather than level such a cruel attack on a disfigured and suffering human being.

The issue is this: The Founders bequeathed a central government of delegated and enumerated powers. Intellectual property laws are the only constitutional means at Congress’s disposal with which to “promote the Progress of Science. (About their merit Thomas Jefferson, himself an inventor, was unconvinced). Research and development (R&D) spending is nowhere among Congress’s constitutional legislative powers.

Implied in Democratic petit mals about Stem Cell research is that if the House didn’t mulct taxpayers of R&D money, there’d be no R&D. Not according to the United States Department of Health & Human Services: “Based on 2002 data, one study reports that private sector research and development in stem cells was being conducted by approximately 1000 scientists in over 30 firms. Aggregate spending was estimated at $208 million. Geron Corporation alone reported that it spent more than $70 million on stem cell research by September 2003.

In the Stem Cell Business News Guide to Stem Cell Companies (Feb 2003), 61 U.S. and international companies are listed as pursuing some form of research or therapeutic product development involving stem cells. What do you know? The private sector has already been beavering away, for some time now, exploring the promise—or lack thereof—of stem cells.

Limbaugh needed only to remind Fox (and himself and his party) of a thing called the Constitution; he needed to berate Fox only for using his celebrity to petition congress for money not his—tax dollars. Limbaugh ought to have suggested Fox raise money for private research among his stinking rich friends, not pickpocket the taxpayer. Instead Limbaugh climbed into a cripple.

Later, Limbaugh offered a lame apology, the main purpose of which was to point out how magnanimous he was: “All right then, I stand corrected. . . . So I will bigly, hugely admit that I was wrong, and I will apologize to Michael J. Fox, if I am wrong in characterizing his behavior on this commercial as an act.”