Andrew Salivates

Islam, Media, Middle East, Republicans, The Zeitgeist

On a meta-level—process, not content—Hugh Hewitt’s interview with Andrew Sullivan about his new confused book exposes Sullivan as arrogant and hysterical. His manners are abominable. How Hewitt put up with Sullivan’s strutting, I don’t know. Why would he tolerate such rudeness from a guest? Is Sullivan that important? (Not to me. I have no interest in someone so “discerning” as to claim, as Sullivan did during the interview, that Jesus, Mohamed, and Socrates are part of the same search for truth.)

I’m happy Sullivan has finally come out against Bush’s dastardly doctrines, although it seems to me that he considers the war more of a logistic than a moral nightmare—the war is bad because it’s going badly, not because it’s bad. The fact that he seconded the decision to invade Iraq may have something to do with this qualified condemnation.

Would it be unfair to put Sullivan’s temper tantrum at the Republicans down to their excessive religious meddling and lack of enthusiasm for gay marriage? (There’s nothing wrong with split infinitives, by the way.) You tell me. (Sullivan is a gay-marriage activist–I’m not, as you can glean from “Marriage and the Manufacturing of Rights“–and is himself “engaged to be married.”)

Overall, his views are hardly conservative–but then that applies to the views of very many contemporary conservatives.

Letter of the Week: John Danforth on Canadian Culture

Canada, Individual Rights

I’ve spent quite a bit of time in Ontario, Canada, and I’ve found about the same percentage of rugged individualists there in industry as we have here in the formerly industrial wasteland known as Michigan.

The difference is that the ‘culture’ there really is ‘cultured’ by the government, as when you grow pathogens in a petri dish. So those who have the constitution of individualists are merely incrementally more out of place and out of touch. Their Ministry of Culture sees to it that all (mostly government controlled) media outlets blanket the landscape with nanny state wonder stories, interspersed with nasty ‘artier than thou’ condescending sniffs at vulgar Americanism. The newspapers, especially in Toronto, have raised this to a fine art. The individualist in such an atmosphere must not only get all of his information from the internet, he must also swim in the sea of life completely at odds with the emotional and intellectual environment around him.

We really aren’t that different, though. The disparaging remarks towards Canadians should be tempered with the observation that at least we (mostly) share a language and a custom of politeness, both of which are fading faster in the U.S. than in Canada. But Canada seems to be in a race with the U.S.—trying to stay 10 years ahead in the slide towards welfare state bankruptcy. That race is the unifying glue to their fractious political system. They might squabble, even contemplate secession, but none of them wants to be seen by the others as ‘just another state.’

My years of dealing with customers across the border have yielded a few valuable friendships. When my friends would joke about us gun-totin’ cowboys (they loved to go the shooting range and waste handgun ammunition, a forbidden pleasure for them), I would ask them if they ever saw the Monty Python lumberjack song. Other than those few friends, though, I was left with the overall impression of wonderment—if I hadn’t seen it myself, I might not have believed that a people could love their servitude so.

—John Danforth

Updated: Canada: Crap Country

Canada, Government, Taxation

I once wrote on my website that having lived in both countries, I’d take the U.S. anytime over Canada and its Nordic, morose people. After doing time there (seven lean years), I can with comfort compile a composite of the Canadian Character. My inspiration would be the somnambulant, morbid, long-suffering zombies of Ingmar Bergman’s films.

Then I felt guilty and removed the comment. Perhaps it was a little severe. And, after all, hadn’t Canada opposed the invasion of Iraq? That alone warranted a reevaluation of this already-broad generalization.

Yesterday I was reminded of the mind-numbing pettiness that made Canada such a disgusting place to live in the first place (tax rates aside).

I am planning on purchasing a new mattress this week. The old one is a perfectly good, high-quality mattress, bought originally in Canada. I suggested to my daughter (who still resides in that place) that she take it. She’s sleeping on something from which the springs protrude.

She and a friend hired a van and arrived to collect the thing. I was glad knowing that she’d be sleeping on a decent mattress. After a pleasant evening of Ali G. viewing (which is where the apt appellation “crap country” originates), the “kids” headed back to “Soviet Canuckistan” with the neatly wrapped mattress and base and a few other odds and ends (more furniture, but also the stuff mothers give kids who’ve left the nest: anti-cold meds, vitamins, pullovers, socks, and ready, wild rice from Trader Joe’s, which is kind of like Capers, only dirt cheap).

Sometime later we received a frantic call from the border: customs would not allow a used mattress through—one that had originated in Canada—without proof that it had been fumigated (my daughter is asthmatic and would not have been able to sleep on a mattress that had been fouled in this fashion). What’s more, the cretins tried to shake the kids down for money to dump the thing for them. Thieves.

The Used Mattress Materials Regulations are very vague, but the bastards at the border embellished and said that if they did return to the US and came back the following day, they’d better have certified proof from a fumigator.

The only bed bugs (and other vermin) that ever came close to that mattress set were those customs creeps.

P.S. Please spare me the somber (Canadian) “don’t-generalize” comments. I know a few wonderful Canadians (okay two, maybe three). But had we known it was such a socialist dump —an honorary member of the Third World is how the Wall Street Journal described it—and that we’d be clipping coupons for our first three years there and living in a complex infested with Iranian gangs—we’d have come on straight to the States. Oh, and my husband was in the top 10% of earners in Canada. Yep, that’s as good as it gets for highly-skilled newcomers. Gotta keep the gap between taxpayers and tax consumers as narrow as possible.

Update: I’m rather proud to report that despite the stress endured by the border bullies—and the fury of not being able to keep her property—my daughter and her friend still found the composure to look up a charity in the nearest US town, drive there, and donate the mattress. That’s far better than letting the bureaucratic bandits steal it.

Fox & Friend: Prince Al-Waleed

Islam

Over the weekend, Fox News ventured into the “Is Islam Peaceful? Sure it is” carefully crafted conversation (or shall I say consensus). They invited Dennis Ross and Steven Emerson to comment. The last was better than the first, but neither, as far as I know, is a scholar of Islam.

That’s when Robert Spencer ought to have been brought in, but wasn’t—seldom is. Spencer is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), which is still a bestseller a year since its publication. His latest literary hole-in-one is The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion. It’s 63rd on Amazon. Both are courageous, path-breaking works.

As to why Fox has not consulted a genuine expert on Islam about its teachings, well, maybe their part-owner, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, has “counseled” against it.