printAfter a conference (some photos are posted below) in Baltimore, I decamped to Old Town Alexandria (still occupied federal territory) to do some sightseeing. That meant staying away from the venue from which Glenn Beck and his 9/twelvers choose to rouse the nation: DC. Incidentally, a gentle bouquet of sewerage blanketed DC when I landed at Reagan National Airport. It lingered for days.
I, of course, needed no olfactory reminders to steer clear of DC. We headed into Virginia. Fredericksburg, Charlottesville, and Orange: The landscape took my breath away. So beautiful, so steeped in history and patriotism. One could so clearly see why magnificent men once defended these places to the death.
Sadly, after touring George Washington’s Mount Vernon, James Madison’s woefully neglected Montpelier, and Thomas Jefferson’s home, Monticello, Sean and I turned into betting men. The bet? In what room, or stage of the guided tour, would our guide begin to deconstruct the founders for slavery, making sure that all present understood how compromised were these brilliant and brave individuals because of that peculiar institution.
Whites had been taught well. Many of the questions fielded touched on slavery; most of those present were eager to display their exquisite sensitivity. Achingly sensitive: Although the slave quarters were closed for renovations, one young man had draped himself over a windowsill. There he stood motionless, deep in thought, his frame racked by (very showy) pain.
An African-American family sauntered toward the estate plan, where I lingered. The father pointed his son toward one thing and one thing only: “Here, son, were the slave quarters. Here is their unmarked tomb,” said dad. They left. Thus was the boy instructed to keep those suppurating sores oozing with resentment. Not a word did dad disgorge about George Washington. Thus was Washington whittled down.
At Monticello we were joined by my good friend the economist and historian Tom DiLorenzo. Tom has blogged about another libel leveled against “The Great Man,” on Lewrockwell.com: the notion that “Jefferson fathered six children with slave Sally Hemmings,” disseminated by the “school-marmish tour guide.”
On average, by the time you arrive at the second room in any given house, you are hit with the requirement that Honky expiate over slavery. The Founders, it is intimated, are beyond repair given the contradiction they embodied. This was the gist of the message.
One pimply female gatekeeper—she was ominously standing sentinel at Washington’s tomb—wearing trendy shades and a shortish skirt, explained to a concerned middle-aged white man: “Washington freed his slaves towards the end, but kept some on because “he was addicted to the life style.” Imagine using contemporary pop-psyche vernacular in this context!
HISTORY FROM BELOW. The history of the US is what the Legislative Black Caucus, the NAACP, and so-called civil-rights activists say it is; it’s history from below; a litany of complaints and contrivances from self-styled victims’ groups on behalf of minor historical figures.
Outside “the plantation office building where Stonewall Jackson died in Guinea Station, Virginia.”
These little piggies, Ossabaw Island Hogs, belong to the very breed once bred by George Washington at Mount Vernon. This most innovative farmer, who used state-of-the-art technologies and thinking with respect to agriculture and conservation, was, naturally, nothing without the slaves (whom he and his ilk schooled).
With Barely A Blog Star, Myron Pauli, who was good enough to attend the Mencken Club Conference.
Peter Brimelow and myself.
UPDATE: I understand that David, in the Comment hereunder, is being cynical when he writes, “I got it, the founders were flawed, sinful men like me and you,” but the following bears saying:
No, the Founders were nothing like us. Not even close. I’m not talking as an idealist, but as a realist. Judging from their deeds and their words, the American Founding Fathers were immeasurably better than just about anyone on earth today (and that goes for that gnarled, somewhat stupid sadist, Mother Teresa. And yes, Christopher Hitchens nailed the woman).
Their actions tell us that they forsook their fortunes for a cause we no longer have the intellectual or moral capabilities to grasp: liberty.
Their writings evince an intelligence and a level of abstraction far beyond that evinced by most contemporary intellectuals. In fact, Charles Murray’s monumental work, Human Accomplishment, in which he comes up with 4,002 subjects who “dragged their fellow men out of wattle-and-daub hovels and pushed them into space rockets,” tends to support my harking to the past, not the present, for intellectual inspiration.
Slavery was debated vigorously and finally abolished by the English—not the Arab or African traders (who persist in the practice).
I cover this topic in my yet-to-be-published book, Into The Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons For The West From Post-Apartheid South Africa. It is a complicated subject. The missionaries in Africa, for example, regarded slaves as children to be de-tribalized and missionized. They were taught skills and trades; mission stations acted as havens for refugees fleeing tribal depredations in South Africa.
As you tour the homes of the founders mentioned above, you’re wont to hear about this or the other wonderful cabinet maker or marvelously gifted horseman, or farmhand, etc. Who do you think taught the slaves these skills and trades? The monarchs of Buganda or Ethiopia?
As I say, the Founders were advanced for their time in EVERY respect. Not perfect, but a great deal more perfect than most of us.
What a crock.
Nothing is bought until it is sold. Or stolen.
And that includes slaves.
Who, of course, were sold into slavery by members of their own tribe.
The black father would’ve been wise to make comparisons from antebellum slavery to some modern practices. The first is family court judges placing children in their mother’s custody in the event of divorce (the majority initiated by wives), and forcing fathers to subsidize the destruction of their families via child support payments.
He should also bring up the generous welfare benefits that make marriage to Uncle Sam more attractive to inner-city women than marriage to a husband – one who will demand sexual regulation. And affirmative action programs that economically elevate black women over black men.
All of these factors have devasted black communities and black men in particular. Yet the traditional civil rights crowd has more indignation over anti-Obama signs at Tea Party rallies than the above issues.
Mentioning the warts of the founders would be fine if one does not overlook their achievements. For example – how blacks won freedoms eventually [that their distant cousins in Africa do not enjoy] – BECAUSE of things put into being by Jefferson, Madison, and Washington. Or how the level of prosperity of blacks in America compared to blacks in Africa is derivative of the intellectual achievements of and the free-market philosophy of white Europeans that lifted America from a wilderness in 1610 to a prosperous land of 2010.
Of course, those who are against massive low-level immigration may also draw lessons from a different parallel with slavery. Slavery was a cheap source of low-level coolie labor [cheaper and more “controllable”] than indentured servants or paid laborers. Nowadays, many employers prefer obedient illegal aliens to paying higher market wages for native-born Americans. That the imported slaves and their descendents were/are often culturally incompatible with WASPish America is unspoken.
Naturally, it is more convenient to tear down the 18th Century slaveowning aristocrats than to compare and contrast them with the partisan self-serving “contribution-soliciting” professional hacks. In our modern civilized era, Ted Kennedy and Larry Craig can take pride with not owning slaves!
Beautiful pictures. Welcome back. 🙂
Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.
Jefferson might view our current predicament with a knowing smirk.
Well and darned well said. I live in this modern day revisionist world, mostly at work. When actual history and/or logic is inserted in the conversation I am looked at like I have two heads. Long ago I ceased trying to make sense to people. A classic case of casting pearls to the swine. Mercer is one of the few logical, educated people in public life who verbalize such thoughts.
If I drag truly extraordinary men down, I think I can feel better about myself, I guess. I got it, the founders were flawed, sinful men like me and you. So what else is new? It is ever the problem of viewing the past strictly through the lens of our own place in history, as if we ourselves are somehow above or outside of the times in which we live, so base, vulgar, corrupt . . . and mediocre.
True humility is beyond our ken.
The ordered system of liberty the likes of Washington, Jefferson, Madison, et al. sought to create and became stewards of was, however flawed, truly amazing. I’d like to see the so-called elites and chattering class of today come up with anything better. Then again, no I don’t. The utopia they’re attempting to force on us now will end as a nightmare.
Since history of the founding fathers and their contribution to Slavery is the theme, we might consider the founder of slavery in America. Mr. Anthony Johnson, (Black) who in 1653, went to court in Northampton County, Virginia and sued his white neighbor, Mr. Parker to give him back his black slave John Castor. Castor had left Johnson’s service and went to work as an employee of a white farmer, named Parker. Castor had told Parker that he had completed his term of indenture with Johnson and was a free man; Johnson took Parker to court stating that he owned Castor, and won. If he had lost, slavery would not have started in this country. Blacks owe the start of slavery to one of their own. Ref: The Politically Incorrect Guide to the South, Clint Johnson (no relation to the subject) page 81-84. Mr. Johnson references his sources in the Bibliography. Books I don’t personally have access to.
As I recall the founders were divided about slavery as well. These same flawed white men formed the constitution that could modified at some future time to deal with slavery.
BTW welcome back and thanks for posting the pictures. 🙂