Category Archives: Jihad

UPDATE (6/21): Don’t Let Politicians Win; Withdraw From Public Square Following A Terrorist Attack

Europe, Islam, Jihad, Politics, Terrorism

Fox News’ Shepard Smith was exalting the Belgian human anthill for the speed with which the ants returned to darting back and forth, following a Muhammadan’s attack on Brussels’ Central Station. The terrorist win if we don’t return to our aimless consumption, laughing and making merry as we’re being picked off by the enemy within, goes Shep’s “thinking.”

The terrorists win if we don’t do as the politicians say” is reverse psychology and cliché rolled into one. Obama kept saying, “Dare do x, y or z on matters Muslim, and you guarantee that ISIS wins.” Or, “ISIS wants you to do x, y, and z.”

First, how do these asses know what ISIS wants? Or, are politicians and pundits like Shep simply ass-uming they know? It is more likely politicians are using reverse psychology to get Westerners to comply with their own wishes.

In any event, if ISIS wants you, America, to do what in your estimation is best for you–perhaps ISIS is right and the politicians and pundits are wrong. What a concept!

Perhaps ISIS is right and Shepard Smith is wrong. Mr. Smith, we’ll take that long moratorium on Muslim immigration, which Trump promised and reneged on. It’s a winner for Americans and Europeans. If ISIS approves, too, so be it. ISIS is happy; we are happy; everybody is happy; we all win.

To peacefully bring about the desired immigration policy changes, people need to withdraw from the public square to the extent possible. Secede. Shop online. Instead of dining out, gather at the homes of friends. Only when their Keynesian edifice of non-stop consumption suffers and their re-election is threatened will the politicians carry out their duty to implement immigration policies that safeguard lives.

For more, read The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed.

UPDATE (6/21/017): Excellent. Americans, at least, are acting rationally. They’re not rah-rahing it for the politicians.

Gallop has found that, “Terrorism Fears Drive More in US to Avoid Crowds”:

38% of Americans less willing to attend large events due to terrorism
Previous high was 32% in 2002
46% less willing to travel overseas due to terrorism concerns

MORE.

Extra-Diabolical: A Bomb Packed With Nails

Britain, Islam, Jihad, Terrorism

We know something about the injuries likely sustained by a nail bomb, since Israeli civilians have endured these diabolical devices for decades.

Although the news nitworks rarely cover this aspect, the task facing Israeli medics, and now doctors in Manchester, has become a routine. Surgeons must slice open the surviving victims of these fiendish devices, picking from the flesh and burrowing in the bone for embedded shards of shrapnel, ball bearings, and nails. Palestinian MOPEs (Most Oppressed People Ever) pack their fare with rat poison, a diabolic touch intended to intensify internal bleeding. If they survive, victims are left maimed and wracked with life-long disfigurement and pain.

X-rays taken from victims of suicide bombings reveal pieces of metallic fragments embedded in their skin, muscles, organs and bones, says Dr. Michael Messing, who visited the victims of suicide bombings while at the Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem. Suicide bombers pack their bombs with nails and other objects so even survivors of suicide bombings will suffer from the bomb’s effects.

UPDATE II (5/31): NEW COLUMN: Manchester Massacre And The Immigration Vexation

Britain, Homeland Security, IMMIGRATION, Islam, Jihad, Terrorism

“The Manchester Massacre Was Murder-By-Muslim Immigrant” is now on The Daily Caller. An excerpt:

“ISIS” did not attack in Manchester; a second-generation Muslim, son of immigrants, did.

The Islamic State may have inspired 22-year-old Salman Abedi, but ISIS in the Middle East did not murder 22 youngsters and injure dozens at a pop-tart performance in Britain.

ISIS, no doubt, is pleased Salman Abedi has killed in Manchester. The outfit is eager to continue providing inspiration, even training, to his kind. But the ephemeral ISIS did not send Abedi and his ilk to kill Britons.

The Abedis, who fly the Libyan flag outside the family home, were invited into England. Policy makers and power brokers in the West have invited Muslim immigrants to live among us in the belief that, underneath the burqa, the abaya and full-body swaddle they were just like us.

Almost all these Muslim killers are legitimate immigrants. Before the Manchester murderer came Knifeman Khalid Masood, on Westminster Bridge (March, 2017). There were the immigrants who carved up Drummer Lee Rigby, in Woolwich, and the Muslim who gutted an American woman in central London, both in 2013. It’s hard to keep up.

This is how citizenship in the West has been rubbished. Not by ISIS, but by your representatives: State officials who regard all of us impersonally and imperiously. The same overlords squint at the great unwashed of England or Middle America from behind their parapets in Whitehall and Washington. The same sorts despise us all for wanting neighborhoods that are safe, maybe even a tad monocultural.

While the Muslims who strike at our families live among us, they’re not of us.

Look, language mediates behavior. To properly respond to the vipers that elect to kill Americans, Europeans and Englishmen, we need to closely describe them.

To be vested in linguistic accuracy is to be vested in the truth. The closer language cleaves to reality, the greater the likelihood that correct, and corrective, action will follow.

Certainly the term of choice must reflect not ideology, right or left, but reality. For if we don’t describe exactly who’s killing us; we’ll be unable to eject them from our midst. …

… READ THE REST. “The Manchester Massacre Was Murder-By-Muslim Immigrant” is now on The Daily Caller.

Bulldoze the family home, a la Israel, send them packing to Libya.


Winning.


Here’s a loser:

UPDATE II (5/26):

Myron Robert Pauli On Facebook:

Excellent points. These attacks are not carried out by ICBM’s located overseas (and we need to hunt down rocket sites) – they have been carried out by people who get here or into the UK, France, Spain, Belgium, Germany etc. So: [1] On what basis do we let most of these people in as immigrants – especially if they wish to fly foreign flags?, [2] Are there not other more deserving and more capable immigrants?, [3] Why do we let people overstay their visas? [4] Why do we have trespassers released back into the communities to do more trespassing? [5] Why do trespassers get reduced college tuition? [6] Why does not Congress make more sensible immigration rules? [7] How does confiscating my cheese spread make America safer?

In Poland…

Our protectors.

UPDATE II (5/31): We fund their hobby.

He shopped. Nobody said a thing. “Manchester Bomber Bought Most Of Weapon’s Parts By Himself, Police Say.”

It’s in the Qur’an and Sunnah:

British Security Fears LEAKS … Will Expose Their Criminal Negligence

Britain, Intelligence, Islam, Jihad, Terrorism

Of course British Counter Terrorism agencies are furious over any leaks of information (that belongs to the People). Leaks reveal their ineptitude; their dereliction of duty. Leaks reveal the elaborate protections put in place by the people’s representatives for … members of the protected species. Never stop a swarthy looking chap with a backpack (in this case Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi). He could be a Muslim. A security strategy practiced across the UK and Europe. Better to allow innocents die than be caught in a politically impious posture (such as questioning a swarthy looking chap with a backpack).

What British security call “leaks” are really bits and pieces they’d like to conceal because these may force action or expose ineptitude.

Via The Telegraph comes a familiar tale (chronicled previously in the column, “Life With Islam And Its Enablers”):

The Manchester suicide bomber was repeatedly flagged to the authorities over his extremist views, but was not stopped by officers, it emerged Wednesday night.

Counter Terrorism agencies were facing questions after it emerged Salman Abedi told friends that “being a suicide bomber was okay”, prompting them to call the Government’s anti-terrorism hotline.

Sources suggest that authorities were informed of the danger posed by Abedi on at least five separate occasions in the five years prior to the attack on Monday night. …

MORE.

This is all old and tired, chronicled on April 4, in “Life With Islam And Its Enablers”:

Be it Stockholm, St. Petersburg, Paris, Nice, Brussels, Berlin; Orlando, or San Bernardino—the men with mass murder on their minds are Muslim, often with criminal records or with a sudden heightened interest in Islam. That risk factor, Islam, is unacknowledged. Its followers are ignored, seldom stopped, and generally dismissed as misguided by the very intelligence agencies now successfully hobbling President Trump.

Posthumously, Jihadi killers are remembered kindly by a conditioned dhimmi community (ours) and by the complicit community (theirs). Nice guys all.

When these characters come to the attention of the authorities, they’re consistently given a pass for their infractions. Invariably are they interviewed and released, unleashed on innocents, because, somehow, they inspired faith in their inquisitors.

The same interrogators are better disposed to prosecuting patriots for impolite speech against Islam. Dutchman Geert Wilders and France’s Marine Le Pen come to mind. Persecuting another, President Donald Trump, for being too polite to Russia is another preferred pastime of Deep-State operatives, who’ll invariably call-off surveillance of Islamists, as they funnel fungible funds into, say, surveilling Trump Tower.

READ “Life With Islam And Its Enablers.”