Of course British Counter Terrorism agencies are furious over any leaks of information (that belongs to the People). Leaks reveal their ineptitude; their dereliction of duty. Leaks reveal the elaborate protections put in place by the people’s representatives for … members of the protected species. Never stop a swarthy looking chap with a backpack (in this case Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi). He could be a Muslim. A security strategy practiced across the UK and Europe. Better to allow innocents die than be caught in a politically impious posture (such as questioning a swarthy looking chap with a backpack).
What British security call “leaks” are really bits and pieces they’d like to conceal because these may force action or expose ineptitude.
Via The Telegraph comes a familiar tale (chronicled previously in the column, “Life With Islam And Its Enablers”):
The Manchester suicide bomber was repeatedly flagged to the authorities over his extremist views, but was not stopped by officers, it emerged Wednesday night.
Counter Terrorism agencies were facing questions after it emerged Salman Abedi told friends that “being a suicide bomber was okay”, prompting them to call the Government’s anti-terrorism hotline.
Sources suggest that authorities were informed of the danger posed by Abedi on at least five separate occasions in the five years prior to the attack on Monday night. …
This is all old and tired, chronicled on April 4, in “Life With Islam And Its Enablers”:
Be it Stockholm, St. Petersburg, Paris, Nice, Brussels, Berlin; Orlando, or San Bernardino—the men with mass murder on their minds are Muslim, often with criminal records or with a sudden heightened interest in Islam. That risk factor, Islam, is unacknowledged. Its followers are ignored, seldom stopped, and generally dismissed as misguided by the very intelligence agencies now successfully hobbling President Trump.
Posthumously, Jihadi killers are remembered kindly by a conditioned dhimmi community (ours) and by the complicit community (theirs). Nice guys all.
When these characters come to the attention of the authorities, they’re consistently given a pass for their infractions. Invariably are they interviewed and released, unleashed on innocents, because, somehow, they inspired faith in their inquisitors.
The same interrogators are better disposed to prosecuting patriots for impolite speech against Islam. Dutchman Geert Wilders and France’s Marine Le Pen come to mind. Persecuting another, President Donald Trump, for being too polite to Russia is another preferred pastime of Deep-State operatives, who’ll invariably call-off surveillance of Islamists, as they funnel fungible funds into, say, surveilling Trump Tower.
READ “Life With Islam And Its Enablers.”
Same old same old. The latest killer (of kids, this time) courtesy of the religion of peace is “a British citizen of Libyan descent,” 22-year-old Salman Abedi. Useless British security apparatus is protecting his information, to protect themselves, naturally, and those their policies privilege.
How dare Europeans call themselves free citizens! The UK and, for the matter, France, Germany and the rest of EU controlled Europe, have no right to claim their societies are free. (Or that elections are in furtherance of freedom, which they lack and don’t seem eager to rediscover.)
“[Paul] Weston, a candidate for English member of the European Parliament, was arrested [three] years ago for reading aloud a passage” from a novel, The River War (1899), by Winston Churchill. These are the words that can get you arrested in Europe:
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. (“Churchill in Africa,” APRIL 6, 2017, Chronicles magazine.)
Canada is similar.
Berkley is an intellectual cesspool. Defund it. Definitely privatize it. Sack it, for all I care. But if Berkley is anything to go by, the US is inching toward the criminalization of so-called offensive speech. Academics enforce speech codes they invent. Police refuse to uphold the rights of speakers to speak unmolested. It’s coming. (See “The Battle Of Berkeley 4: Peace And Another Victory For The Deplorables.”)
Without further ado:
When it comes to Islam, Russians are very different to our overlords who art in DC.
Russians are quick to release to the public an image of the alleged suspect in the St. Petersburg subway bombing:
Russian authorities don’t seem to look away:
Chinese and Russians are known to object to the rape of their women. WTF! Didn’t they get the memo?
Meanwhile back in Sweden it’s submission:
Is Trump abandoning his promise to keep the unvettable out?
Neocons and neolibs have generally fought on the side of Islam:
Corporate culture and Islam: for it.
Gen. Mattis loves Islam. The political establishment loves him back:
The Westminster Bridge Attack & the West.
Theresa May, Islamic scholar:
Tommy Robinson: Much better than T. May:
Kill the Jews:
The Dhimma in Dar al Islam elect Muslims:
Die occasionally, for “Our Values,” say our representatives:
Patriots expunged from US Intelligence:
Doh! It’s because we’re free that they hate us! How do I know? “W” said so.